r3volution 3.0
Banned
- Joined
- Mar 6, 2014
- Messages
- 18,553
All of them if he wins Iowa.
Yup
All of them if he wins Iowa.
Unfortunately I agree.... He will probably do worse than Ron did in 2012.Sadly at this point in time I would have to say none. That could change, anything is possible, but not likely.
Yes... Rand has no operations in LA or ME this time around, but he does have operations in NV.Didn't Ron nearly win Louisiana, Nevada, & Maine but shenanigans from the Republican Party literally stole those away from him?
Unfortunately I agree.... He will probably do worse than Ron did in 2012.
They are putting in some effort there for sure, but again, it is not as widespread as it was in 2012. He won't do as well as Ron did.How about Minnesota? What are you hearing?
- ML
I wish that were true, but you know that the mainstream networks would downplay Sen. Paul's victory in Iowa by reminding the public that "an Iowa victory has never led to a Republican nomination." From that, they would probably shift the focus back to their top-tier trinity of Trump-Cruz-Rubio.
I just think Sen. Paul's campaign needs to be ready to deal with that backlash, should he win Iowa. When that happens, the first thing he should do is expose how much the polls are unreliable and unscientific, just to set the record straight for the next primaries.
Also, the Fox Graphic of Rand's win would look something like this:
Cruz 21%
Trump 18%
Paul 24%
Iowa, New Hampshire, Maine, Nevada, Kentucky, Utah, Washington, Colorado, Texas I think may be most likely, I could be missing some though, and I think he could win a lot more if he got traction including California.
You don't think he has a shot at CA? Who gets them?ME (even though Paul LePage flaked on the liberty movement), MT, and ND are good bets as well if he wins IA and NH. If he continues to do well NV, NC, WA, VA, WV, UT, are all possibilities.
We can count out all of the south. We're for Bush and Cruz down here.NY, FL, CA rule out as well.