timosman Banned Joined Dec 28, 2011 Messages 29,090 Jul 8, 2015 #21 Henry Rogue said: What Tulsa and Banana said. Fed makes it all possible. Click to expand... NSA would exist even without the FED. The government would appropriate money for them hell or high water.
Henry Rogue said: What Tulsa and Banana said. Fed makes it all possible. Click to expand... NSA would exist even without the FED. The government would appropriate money for them hell or high water.
osan Member Joined Dec 26, 2009 Messages 16,875 Jul 9, 2015 #22 dude58677 said: The Fed of the NSA? Which is more difficult to challenge? Click to expand... Without that which the Fed provides, NSA does not function. You should be able to take it from there.
dude58677 said: The Fed of the NSA? Which is more difficult to challenge? Click to expand... Without that which the Fed provides, NSA does not function. You should be able to take it from there.
Occam's Banana Moderator Staff member Joined Nov 5, 2010 Messages 40,998 Jul 9, 2015 #23 timosman said: NSA would exist even without the FED. The government would appropriate money for them hell or high water. Click to expand... And in order to do that without (something like) the Fed, they'd have to withhold equivalent appropriations from some other department or program. But with the Fed, they don't have that problem - they can fund all and sundry. That is why the Fed is the bigger problem.
timosman said: NSA would exist even without the FED. The government would appropriate money for them hell or high water. Click to expand... And in order to do that without (something like) the Fed, they'd have to withhold equivalent appropriations from some other department or program. But with the Fed, they don't have that problem - they can fund all and sundry. That is why the Fed is the bigger problem.