Where's Hillary?

Foolish people like yourself act surprised when he utilizes strategies for dealing with the media, that he outlined in his books, that are ABOUT DEALING WITH THE MEDIA.

Then when you explain that he is doing exactly what he wrote in his books, people just write it off as "Trumpsplaining". You're god damn right it's Trumpsplaining, Trump explained what to do, then he did it, then I explained that all to you, and you have the gal to write it off as coming out of thin air.. It's right there in his $#@!ing books for everyone to read. The media has access to them also, and they are just as bad.

You need to learn to become a critical thinker instead of just a reactor.

You fell for Trump's promises, now having to explain away for him and I'm the foolish one?
 
You fell for Trump's promises, now having to explain away for him and I'm the foolish one?

You are talking about things that haven't happened yet and you are claiming you are right. YOU ARE THE FOOLISH ONE. Nothing has happened yet, and it makes perfect 100% sense for Trump to lay low on this issue so they don't panic and issue a pardon. It doesn't make ANY sense for Trump to lay his cards on the table right now. If you can explain why that would behoove him, then go right ahead, but all you can do is make dumb comments.

I was the one of the ones here claiming that "Trump is winning" for almost a year before he actually won. Every time CPUd would jump in with one of his stupid blue maps.

YOU LOST. Get over it. Try to actually learn something for once from people smarter than you.
 
Last edited:
You are talking about things that haven't happened yet and you are claiming you are right. YOU ARE THE FOOLISH ONE. Nothing has happened yet, and it makes perfect 100% sense for Trump to lay low on this issue so they don't panic and issue a pardon. It doesn't make ANY sense for Trump to lay his cards on the table right now. If you can explain why that would behoove him, then go right ahead, but all you can do is make dumb comments.

I was the one of the ones here claiming that "Trump is winning" for almost a year before he actually won. Every time CPUd would jump in with one of his stupid blue maps.

YOU LOST. Get over it. Try to actually learn something for once from people smarter than you.

So you basically you are telling us that Trump was lying when he told the NYT yesterday that he isn't going to prosecute Clinton and it's actually some super secret strategy to actually prosecute Clinton? The orange one can do no wrong can he?
 
So you basically you are telling us that Trump was lying when he told the NYT yesterday that he isn't going to prosecute Clinton and it's actually some super secret strategy to actually prosecute Clinton? The orange one can do no wrong can he?

First of all, Trump didn't say ANYTHING. Choose your words carefully, they have meaning. Secondly, the President does not prosecute anybody, either way, so she didn't actually lie about anything. What she did is make an accurate statement, and let the mainstream media lie for her. YOU bought the lie the mainstream media told you. Stop it.
 
Last edited:
First of all, Trump didn't say ANYTHING. Choose your words carefully, they have meaning. Secondly, the President does not prosecute anybody, either way, so she didn't actually lie about anything. What she did is make an accurate statement, and let the mainstream media lie for her. YOU bought the lie the mainstream media told you. Stop it.

You really think potus doesn't control DOJ? It's all politically motivated, the truth means nothing. One airport rendezvous between slick willy and Lynch and Hillary was off the hook.

Yeah he did say that. He said doesn't want to hurt the Clintons and wants to move forward. He doesn't feel strongly about it. He's saying his trumpkins will have to accept it.

Here's the transcript if you still want to pretend he's putting Clinton in jail.

MAGGIE HABERMAN, political reporter: I’ll start, thank you, Dean. Mr. President, I’d like to thank you for being here. This morning, Kellyanne Conway talked about not prosecuting Hillary Clinton. We were hoping you could talk about exactly what that means — does that mean just the emails, or the emails and the foundation, and how you came to that decision.
Photo
Mr. Trump leaving The New York Times after meeting with reporters, editors and the publisher, Arthur Sulzberger Jr., on Tuesday. Credit Todd Heisler/The New York Times

TRUMP: Well, there was a report that somebody said that I’m not enthused about it. Look, I want to move forward, I don’t want to move back. And I don’t want to hurt the Clintons. I really don’t.

She went through a lot. And suffered greatly in many different ways. And I am not looking to hurt them at all. The campaign was vicious. They say it was the most vicious primary and the most vicious campaign. I guess, added together, it was definitely the most vicious; probably, I assume you sold a lot of newspapers.

[laughter]

I would imagine. I would imagine. I’m just telling you, Maggie, I’m not looking to hurt them. I think they’ve been through a lot. They’ve gone through a lot.

I’m really looking … I think we have to get the focus of the country into looking forward.

SULZBERGER: If I could interject, we had a good conversation there, you and I, and it was off the record, but there was nothing secret, just wanted to make sure. The idea of looking forward was one of the themes that you were saying. That we need to now get past the election, right?

MATTHEW PURDY, deputy managing editor: So you’re definitively taking that off the table? The investigation?

TRUMP: No, but the question was asked.

PURDY: About the emails and the foundation?

TRUMP: No, no, but it’s just not something that I feel very strongly about. I feel very strongly about health care. I feel very strongly about an immigration bill that I think even the people in this room can be happy. You know, you’ve been talking about immigration bills for 50 years and nothing’s ever happened.

I feel very strongly about an immigration bill that’s fair and just and a lot of other things. There are a lot of things I feel strongly about. I’m not looking to look back and go through this. This was a very painful period. This was a very painful election with all of the email things and all of the foundation things and all of the everything that they went through and the whole country went through. This was a very painful period of time. I read recently where it was, it was, they’re saying, they used to say it was Lincoln against whoever and none of us were there to see it. And there aren’t a lot of recordings of that, right?

[laughter]

But the fact is that there were some pretty vicious elections; they say this was, this was the most.

They say it was definitely the most vicious primary. And I think it’s very important to look forward.

CAROLYN RYAN, senior editor for politics: Do you think it would disappoint your supporters who seemed very animated by the idea of accountability in the Clintons? What would you say to them?

TRUMP: I don’t think they will be disappointed. I think I will explain it, that we have to, in many ways save our country.

Because our country’s really in bad, big trouble. We have a lot of trouble. A lot of problems. And one of the big problems, I talk about, divisiveness. I think that a lot of people will appreciate … I’m not doing it for that reason. I’m doing it because it’s time to go in a different direction. There was a lot of pain, and I think that the people that supported me with such enthusiasm, where they will show up at 1 in the morning to hear a speech.

It was actually Election Day, they showed up at, so that was essentially Election Day. Yeah, I think they’d understand very completely.
 
You really think potus doesn't control DOJ? It's all politically motivated, the truth means nothing. One airport rendezvous between slick willy and Lynch and Hillary was off the hook.

Yeah he did say that. He said doesn't want to hurt the Clintons and wants to move forward. He doesn't feel strongly about it. He's saying his trumpkins will have to accept it.

Here's the transcript if you still want to pretend he's putting Clinton in jail.

You mean this part?

MATTHEW PURDY, deputy managing editor: So you’re definitively taking that off the table? The investigation?

TRUMP: No, but the question was asked.

PURDY: About the emails and the foundation?

TRUMP: No, no,
 
Hillary is resting and recovering from the long, grueling campaign. It turns out, she is some ways tired.
 
You mean this part?

You are going to be really butthurt when it turns out Trump is just going to be mundane moderate potus and not make good on any of his out there campaign promises aren't you? He was telling all of you what you wanted to hear. Throwing red meat.
 
You are going to be really butthurt when it turns out Trump is just going to be mundane moderate potus and not make good on any of his out there campaign promises aren't you? He was telling all of you what you wanted to hear. Throwing red meat.

Or he is downplaying the issue because he hasn't been officially elected and there is still someone in office who can offer a blanket pardon to her, so he is doing what a smart person would do.
 
To be fair, Trump did state that it is stupid to telegraph one's moves to opponents, so it is possible that his softening on the issue is just a ploy.

To be fair, when Obama, Romney, Hillary, McCain, etc. do exactly the same sort of thing, they are (rightly) called mealy-mouthed, double-talking liars ...

And if Trump believes, as you say, "that it is stupid to telegraph one's moves to opponents," then why did he tell Hillary that she would "be in jail" if he became president?

By his own logic, he is either stupid for telegraphing his intention, or he didn't telegraph his intention because he never really meant it. So which is it?
 
To be fair, when Obama, Romney, Hillary, McCain, etc. do exactly the same sort of thing, they are (rightly) called mealy-mouthed, double-talking liars ...

And if Trump believes, as you say, "that it is stupid to telegraph one's moves to opponents," then why did he tell Hillary that she would "be in jail" if he became president?

By his own logic, he is either stupid for telegraphing his intention, or he didn't telegraph his intention because he never really meant it. So which is it?

He had to win the election first..
 
He had to win the election first..

So? He still either (A) telegraphed his intention (in which case, he is "stupid" by his own logic), or (B) did not telegraph his intention (because he didn't really mean it).

Which is it? A or B? Stupid or liar?
 
So? He still either (A) telegraphed his intention (in which case, he is "stupid" by his own logic), or (B) did not telegraph his intention (because he didn't really mean it).

Which is it? A or B? Stupid or liar?

He's keeping 'em guessing.

Genius.
 
Back
Top