Where should a grassroots PAC strike now? Florida, IMO.

rp08orbust

Member
Joined
Dec 20, 2007
Messages
4,803
I haven't seen any update from JoshLowry today on his attempts to get a new grassroots PAC going, so I sure hope that remains an immediate priority. In case you're unaware, he effectively killed the controversial PAC planned by RonPaulNation here by prohibiting it from advertising on this forum, but he also promised to search for those willing to start a new grassroots PAC among trusted members of the forum to replace it. Ron Paul has acknowledged that "pressure from the grassroots" is part of why he has accelerated his campaign in Iowa this year, and it's probably safe to say that our talk about forming a PAC to raise a million dollars and send an armada of buses to Ames with Ron Paul supporters was part of that "pressure." So in a sense, RonPaulNation's short-lived PAC may have been successful, even though it doesn't appear to have progressed much beyond talk.

While it now sounds like Ron Paul does recognize how critical the Ames straw poll is and is preparing to do what it takes to win it, no matter how good his campaign is compared to 2007, there will always be blind spots and overlooked opportunities, and I think we should have a grassroots PAC ready to act on those opportunities before the need for action arises. The time to choose a treasurer and elect a board of directors is now, when the forum is at peace, instead of the next time there is a flame war such as there was over "busgate".

An example of a precious opportunity to advance Ron Paul's presidential candidacy that I think is probably being overlooked or written off by his various organizations is the Florida GOP's "Presidency 5" straw poll conducted in late September. Most of us were not political junkies before Ron Paul's 2007 presidential campaign, and thus have probably not heard of it, because in 2007, a dispute between Romney and McCain loyalists within the Florida GOP caused the straw poll at the "Presidency 4" convention to be canceled. But the straw poll is on this year, and it will be huge, as it was in previous years when there was a race for the Republican presidential nomination. While it doesn't get quite as much attention as the Ames straw poll, it commands more respect as a predictor of not only the winner of Florida's Republican presidential primary, but of the Republican nomination itself. A follow-up victory by Ron Paul at this straw poll in September after winning the Ames straw poll would massively reinforce his status as a top tier candidate nationally.

The reasoning for why Ron Paul needs to win this straw poll is similar to that for why he needs to win the Ames straw poll: It's hard to win the Republican presidential nomination without winning Florida's early primary. But if he cannot win the Presidency 5 straw poll, where the enthusiasm of grassroots support can be leveraged into a victory through organization to compensate for what Ron Paul lacks in breadth of support, then he cannot hope to win Florida's primary where breadth of support dominates. Of course, if Ron Paul does win the Ames straw poll, his breadth of support will be greater in Florida than it is now, but in the few short weeks between Ames and Presidency 5, it will most likely not have risen fast enough for him to be the front-runner in Florida. Thus, we need to stack the deck for Ron Paul as much as we can now if he is to have a chance at winning that straw poll.

Why do we need to stack it now? Because the deadline for registering for this straw poll at http://www.presidency5.com/apply/ is June 10. We can be sure that Mitt Romney is already busy stacking the deck for himself. It would be nice if we had a grassroots PAC ready to pay the registration and perhaps lodging and transportation for any Ron Paul supporters that get selected as delegates to the straw poll. (Note that registration fees are not due unless one is actually selected as a delegate by lottery at the county caucuses later in the summer. Furthermore, the cost of such an effort would be nowhere near as great as that of the Iowa busing plan that was talked about--more on the order of CPAC.) Whether the grassroots PAC could get set up on such short notice in order to support this effort is doubtful, but I think it's worth discussing. In addition to the PAC, we'd need someone like Craig Bergman to step forward in Florida with the ability to lead something like what Craig had in mind for Iowa (robo-calls to voters to identify Ron Paul sympathizers, follow-up phone calls and recruiting, county-by-county phone-banking on caucus days, etc).
 
Last edited:
stoping Ron Paul Nations's idea for a PAC from the message boards reminds me of when the republican establishment kicked Ron Paul out the debates. squash those that seem unpopular among your base and control what gets out.
 
The PAC idea that was kicked around on the forums back in November/December/January got a bit of traction, but we quickly realized that the scope of our efforts was going to be unfeasible. We were shooting for a national PAC that focused exclusively on state-level candidates. That means that you have to register as a PAC independently in each state, and have a dedicated treasurer who is a resident of each state filing the paperwork. The problem is that when you're dealing with the state laws in 20-30 states, you'd better have lawyers on retainer. We weren't prepared to do that.

I think that it would be a great effort if we could establish a national PAC with the FEC, build up a base of support and regular donors, build up an organizational system at the state level, and then implement the above. It's a long process, though.

ETA: If we were to create a grassroots PAC right now, I think it would have to be a federal-level PAC filed with the FEC. If you want to do non-candidate-related things, such as the bus or other projects that do not require direct campaign financing, it should be a 527 and not a PAC.
 
Last edited:
stoping Ron Paul Nations's idea for a PAC from the message boards reminds me of when the republican establishment kicked Ron Paul out the debates. squash those that seem unpopular among your base and control what gets out.

As long as Josh replaces RonPaulNation's PAC with another one, as he said he would, I won't complain. I don't think RonPaulNation will complain either, as long as the job gets done, because I don't think he was in it for himself.
 
The PAC idea that was kicked around on the forums back in November/December/January got a bit of traction, but we quickly realized that the scope of our efforts was going to be unfeasible. We were shooting for a national PAC that focused exclusively on state-level candidates. That means that you have to register as a PAC independently in each state, and have a dedicated treasurer who is a resident of each state filing the paperwork. The problem is that when you're dealing with the state laws in 20-30 states, you'd better have lawyers on retainer. We weren't prepared to do that.

I think that it would be a great effort if we could establish a national PAC with the FEC, build up a base of support and regular donors, build up an organizational system at the state level, and then implement the above. It's a long process, though.

ETA: If we were to create a grassroots PAC right now, I think it would have to be a federal-level PAC filed with the FEC. If you want to do non-candidate-related things, such as the bus or other projects that do not require direct campaign financing, it should be a 527 and not a PAC.

Is it at all within the realm of possibility to get the right organization set up to raise money for the project described in the top post by, say the beginning of June?
 
As long as Josh replaces RonPaulNation's PAC with another one, as he said he would, I won't complain. I don't think RonPaulNation will complain either, as long as the job gets done, because I don't think he was in it for himself.

It is coming. People are currently being vetted. Waiting on a call back at the moment on this.
 
I'm curious as to why this thread was moved to Hot Topics. If it's because of post #8, then could the thread be put back in Grassroots Central if I were to persuade the author to delete the off-topic content?
 
I'm curious as to why this thread was moved to Hot Topics. If it's because of post #8, then could the thread be put back in Grassroots Central if I were to persuade the author to delete the off-topic content?

Bump for explanation.
 
Florida is heavily Neo-Conned, infested with Liberals. I live there so I should know. But I wish you guys the best of luck.
 
Back
Top