Where do Ron Paul's ideas come from?

[A Son of Liberty]

I would be most honored to start a new thread. I proposed that honor to you. Yet I will take it because you rejected it.

You said "I would like to start a new thread". You did not say "please start a new thread".

 

[Travlyr]

You said "I would like to start a new thread". You did not say "please start a new thread".

Yeah, I gave you the opportunity. You did not take it, so I did.

 

[noneedtoaggress]

It is the same thing with noneedtoagress, who is very aggressive, I must add... No desire to debate because he holds values that are not valuable. noneeedtoagress is an empty suit.

I'm simply going to point out that Travlyr is seeking to initiate a conflict with me here, antagonizing me, and calling me names, yet again.

 

[noneedtoaggress]

Now is LE going to neg rep Trav for that?

I wonder.

 

[Travlyr]

I'm simply going to point out that Travlyr is seeking to initiate a conflict with me here, antagonizing me, and calling me names, yet again.

My truce was with 'A Son of Liberty' because he seemed sincere in wanting to debate honest issues. You do not seem sincere. You are like a clown who has no substance. You are a painted face and that is all you bring to the table.

 

[Conza88]

That's great Conza.

But if the Mises Institute promotes Mises as an anarchist when Mises himself rejected anarchy, then what is the purpose? I hold much respect for Ludwig von Mises.

Ludwig von Mises made it very clear that Classical Liberalism has nothing to do with anarchism,

Mises makes it very clear to a reader,

Conza, why are you promoting anarchism when Mises didn't?

This is a one off response - you're still on ignore.

Mises on Anarchism: http://mises.org/Community/forums/t/14869.aspx


See every post of mine in the thread. Now go educate yourself troll.

 

[Travlyr]

This is a one off response - you're still on ignore.

Mises on Anarchism: http://mises.org/Community/forums/t/14869.aspx


See every post of mine in the thread. Now go educate yourself troll.

That is not Mises on anarchism. That is some dude who can't read.

Mises said,

Anarchism misunderstands the real nature of man. It would be practicable only in a world of angels and saints.

Liberalism is not anarchism, nor has it anything whatsoever to do with anarchism. The liberal understands quite clearly that without resort to compulsion, the existence of society would be endangered and that behind the rules of conduct whose observance is necessary to assure peaceful human cooperation must stand the threat of force if the whole edifice of society is not to be continually at the mercy of any one of its members. One must be in a position to compel the person who will not respect the lives, health, personal freedom, or private property of others to acquiesce in the rules of life in society. This is the function that the liberal doctrine assigns to the state: the protection of property, liberty, and peace. - Ludwig von Mises

And,

Liberalism is therefore far from disputing the necessity of a machinery of state, a system of law, and a government. It is a grave misunderstanding to associate it in any way with the idea of anarchism. For the liberal, the state is an absolute necessity, since the most important tasks are incumbent upon it: the protection not only of private property, but also of peace, for in the absence of the latter the full benefits of private property cannot be reaped." - Ludwig von Mises

And then the lame claim will be made again, Mises didn't understand anarchy. Lame Claim. Mises knew what he was talking about. Don't take my word for it, read Mises for yourself.

 

[noneedtoaggress]

My truce was with 'A Son of Liberty' because he seemed sincere in wanting to debate honest issues. You do not seem sincere. You are like a clown who has no substance. You are a painted face and that is all you bring to the table.

I find it telling that you have to "call a truce" in order to stop calling people names and try to have an adult conversation with someone. Don't you find it kind of silly? It's really telling about how you view yourself and what you're doing here.

 

[CCTelander]

I'm simply going to point out that Travlyr is seeking to initiate a conflict with me here, antagonizing me, and calling me names, yet again.

Surely by now you've realized that antagonizing, name calling and just generally trolling "anarchists" is Trav's whole raisone d'etre? Just a thought.

 

[noneedtoaggress]

Can't say I'd be all that surprised if that turned out to be truce.