People don't want to lose their shirt to inflation or get drafted and killed in Iraq, either. Desperate times call for desperate measures.
If you just leave information, this is what your strategy depends on:
1) that they see it, and it doesn't just blow away/get stolen by garden gnomes
2) that they read it without just tossing it
3) that they see enough to go look more
4) that they bother to decide they want to vote for him
5) that they remember later and actually go vote
6) that they do that for the primary and not just wait for the general
You can have whatever opinion you want but actual history of elections in America say this is a failing strategy.
If you talk to them you move responsibility for 1, 2, 5, and 6 (at least) to you instead of them. You can't decide for them to vote for him but you can make sure they get the info, process it to some extent, and if they will vote for him that they actually get to the polls at the right time.
Yes, you also incur some risk of turning off a person who maybe would have voted for him (if they remembered) but won't because someone knocked on their door, but I'm sorry, that's a much lower risk than depending on individuals to think about the election and go out and vote because someone left a flyer on their door. In the precincts I've walked (including my own) the average ratio of people that were glad I'd come talked to them vs. people who said "go away not interested" is probably 3 to 1. The ratio of people at home vs. no one answered is at least 1 to 2, though, so don't worry, you'll have plenty of chances to just leave lit and not have to talk to anyone.
The campaigns that do this part better than the others are the ones that win.
But are you going to answer the question?
I agree, we should all do what we can, and all efforts are to be commended.
I don't believe that knocking on doors is the best method because I hate it when people show up to my house unannounced,
but I do not put down those who do go door to door. As long as they are out there doing something positive to get Dr. Paul elected, they are an asset to the campaign. I look at it like this, is it better to have someone out there leaving material on door knobs, or doing nothing at all. Therefore, if someone does not want, or cannot not due to personal circumstances, go door to door and knock, but are willing to at least leave literature on the doors, they should be given some reinforcement that what they are doing is good.
I'm not sure what you're agreeing with because I didn't say that.
As I said you can think what you want but the history of campaigning in America (which goes back a few hundred years) says you are wrong. If you want to argue your point you should really consider putting up some data, not just personal preference. This is about winning a Presidential election not Miss Congeniality. Some people will be annoyed by knockers but it's statistically not the majority and the risk level involved doesn't come near comparing to the risk level involved in hoping people go out and vote on their own initiative.
I'm sorry if it offends you dude but I'm not really interested in coddling people who aren't putting it on the line given the stakes involved. We don't get to win half an election. This is winner-take-all, with the fate of what's left of the free world and the lives of billions at stake. I imagine the people losing their homes to the current bust would have rathered had someone knock on their door. Next year it may be you and me.
So let me say it plainly: People that are phyiscally capable of going door knocking but choose to do something less are NOT an asset to the campaign. They are a liability. Whatever lesser work they do is only valuable insofar as it manages to recruit other people to go out and do their job for them, if they're lucky.
Whether you like your door knocked or not, door knocking wins elections. If a grassroots as huge and motivated as our own cannot manage the simple math of doing this better than anyone else, it won't be the campaign or the candidate that loses this election, it will be us.
I can see why some of the best posters such as Llepard no longer post here. What a shame, we should be supporting each other but instead we are wasting time arguing.
theres some good canvassing video here: http://www.ronpaulreveres.com/canvassing
im skipping canvassing and hanging flyers from mailboxes with my name and number to call if they want me to put a sign in their yard, or to get involved with my canvassing, or to ask me to deliver a DVD to them. its my precinct and thats going to be most effective for me, here.
DO NOT DO THIS!!! the postal service can get on you hard about hanging anything from a mailbox. it also doesn't allow you to takl to someone and will end up in the trash a vast majority of the time.
Fire Bird wrote:
His treatment here was disgraceful.
I met the man personally at the Boston Tea Party rally and he is a great asset to the effort.
And you think that by being a dick you will unite people to fight for Ron Paul? What kind of twisted logic are you using?
Do you get a kick out of butting in on these threads with your BS? If you can't add anything constructive, buzz off!![]()
I happen to agree with his "BS", so if you don't mind I'd prefer that he doesn't buzz off.
Hope you're not a precinct captain and find something else useful to do then, because the campaign wants people knocking on doors.![]()
it would have to depend on the quality of each individual's efforts.
Not a single person wished to be contacted by Ron Paul campaign. What is going on? Am I just asking the wrong question?
My question is usually :"Would you like to be contacted by the Ron Paul campaign?"
Help me.