When do you sell gold?

Your end goal & desires are the exact same as the State. You just want to be king. You want the removal of it, so you can REPLACE it. You want to be "free" to aggress over others. You have declared you don't respect property rights, nor the non aggression axiom... because you have mentioned, they would not not stop you from "killing, robbing or vandalizing."

Your end destination, where you want to end up = exactly the same as the State. The state is tyranny... and thus you fail. :)

if I wanted tyranny, I'd be stupid to not kiss their ass and work my way up within the system, why risk my being killed in the process fighting them up and down?

I don't want the same result as the State (definitely not a tyrannical), I don't want to rule over other people, I want what I want and what I'm allowed to have. It's no more true for me to say that because you don't believe in rape, you want the same as Marxists.

I see you have a fetish fix using the word fail.
 
if I wanted tyranny, I'd be stupid to not kiss their ass and work my way up within the system, why risk my being killed in the process fighting them up and down?

I don't want the same result as the State (definitely not a tyrannical), I don't want to rule over other people, I want what I want and what I'm allowed to have. It's no more true for me to say that because you don't believe in rape, you want the same as Marxists.

I see you have a fetish fix using the word fail.

No, you WOULD be stupid to kiss their ass etc and work within the system. You'd never make it to the inner ring, you are expendable, you know too much.. :rolleyes: They use YOU, it ain't the other way around chum.. :)

You want the same control as the state, and you haven't said otherwise until now.. The backtracking is going well for you... ;) Your ability to be tyrannical is obviously not going to be as vast as the state; never argued that - but on a personal level, an INDIVIDUAL level you would - and in fact, would in fact have a GREATER ability to be tyrannical.

Fail? Well - I wouldn't have to say it so much, if you didn't do it so often... ;)

OL' Joshy... what happened to your mantra mate...What has happened to your little fetish? "Might is Right" ? :rolleyes: It was your every second sentence, your answer to everything... your be all end all of existence.

By golly, have I gotten through to you some what? :D
 
No, you WOULD be stupid to kiss their ass etc and work within the system. You'd never make it to the inner ring, you are expendable, you know too much.. :rolleyes: They use YOU, it ain't the other way around chum.. :)

You want the same control as the state, and you haven't said otherwise until now.. The backtracking is going well for you... ;) Your ability to be tyrannical is obviously not going to be as vast as the state; never argued that - but on a personal level, an INDIVIDUAL level you would - and in fact, would in fact have a GREATER ability to be tyrannical.

Fail? Well - I wouldn't have to say it so much, if you didn't do it so often... ;)

OL' Joshy... what happened to your mantra mate...What has happened to your little fetish? "Might is Right" ? :rolleyes: It was your every second sentence, your answer to everything... your be all end all of existence.

By golly, have I gotten through to you some what? :D

I haven't said otherwise until now?? I have to say what I am NOT every post in order to be free from your stupid accusations?

I have a greater ability to be tyrannical? Is that a compliment? I still believe might makes right, didn't let it go, or take it back.

And no, don't flatter yourself, you didn't get through to me, you're just starting to understand me if anything. Instead of stopping and thinking and asking me to clarify, you always jump to conclusions about me, and when I explain myself, you say I am backtracking or ad hoc-ing.
 
I wouldnt sell any gold, but I would trade some of it into silver right now if I had some. Its damn near 80:1 right now. Then when silver gets back to 45:1 levels i would trade the silver back in for gold. Then again I am totally asuming that the ratios are going to get back into the 40's.
 
I haven't said otherwise until now?? I have to say what I am NOT every post in order to be free from your stupid accusations?

I have a greater ability to be tyrannical? Is that a compliment? I still believe might makes right, didn't let it go, or take it back.

And no, don't flatter yourself, you didn't get through to me, you're just starting to understand me if anything. Instead of stopping and thinking and asking me to clarify, you always jump to conclusions about me, and when I explain myself, you say I am backtracking or ad hoc-ing.

Naaah mate, I don't jump to conclusions, you do that for me... :)
I don't backtrack, I play with you - I gouge you until you utter insanties, I push your logic to its proper conclusions - so that people can see what you really are.

Behold the snapshot that is Josh... in His own words.

Josh_LA said:
I follow the law by fear of community and government power. Otherwise I have no problem killing, robbing or vandalizing.

Josh_LA said:
I don't believe you have the right to life or property
Josh_LA said:
I would not like retards to have the right to speak or live. I believe it is responsible to have retards, and those who think dramatically differently to be removed, isolated or eliminated from our living space.

Josh_LA said:
I believe force makes things right, doesn't matter if you're a Fascist or communist or capitalist, all systems are achieved and held together by force. (even peaceful communes are, in the sense they can be broken by force and are held together only by the consent and compassion of the whole sphere).

Communists believe private property should be abolished for the greater good of others. I believe private property should be abolished because I feel like it and if you can take it away from a robber over and over, so be it.

Josh_LA said:
Yes, as a social Darwinist and anarchist, I believe gassing and killing those who are unable to defend themselves is OK. Not nice, not good, but OK. It is nobody's fault that they cannot fight back, it's a very socialist idea to defend people who can't help themselves. I believe libertarians, anarchists and those who believe in "personal responsibility" should allow people to die if they can't do any better.

clap.gif


Have you seen Citizen Kane Josh? I suggest you do... ;)

Edit: No more feeding the trolls for a while, had my fun.
 
Last edited:
I hold some gold now and intend to buy some more since I believe the Fed's actions will be highly inflationary (even if it takes years to culminate).

That being said, I am a re-balancer. I sell equities and buy fixed income when stocks go too high and vice versa. However, with gold, since it's primarily a store of value, when should I sell? Seems like there is a lot of arbitrage to be made with gold due to its volatility.

if gold becomes money again... maybe you never sell it.

but i plan on selling my gold when there is a gold mania. If there is gold bubble that forms... that's when you want to sell. But basically, you sell gold when gold is expensive in comparison to other assets. So when stocks get cheap enough, i'll sell my gold in for a particular sector of stocks. Maybe there will be some new alternative energy stuff that looks promising in a few years, and my gold will be so valuable then, that i'll be able to buy up a lot of stocks in undervalued companies. this will likely occur when the DOW:Gold ratio goes to 1:1
 
I sold my gold on Friday. Needed to free up some liquidity so I could increase my shorts ALL, BBY and ANF. Made about 80 $ per share
 
Last edited:
Back
Top