gilliganscorner
Member
- Joined
- Nov 20, 2007
- Messages
- 675
Hi Folks,
Has anyone else noticed this? It seems that MSM is co-ordinating a "divide and conquer" strategy for RP supporters.
I have seen more articles appearing these days talking about the "up and coming" challenger Mike Huckabee to the MSM favourites (Ghouliani and Romney). Take a look at this article.
In it, they construct sentences like:
In fact, Huckabee's name is cited 6 times in this article.
Only one mention of Ron Paul, again framing him as some sort of joke.
I worry about RP. With all of the co-ordinated MSM attacks/suppression/spin being fired at RP, sometimes the obstacles seem so high.
I was looking at the teaparty07.com site and they only have about 21,000 people pledged to donate that day. OK, so I know for sure that there are 21,000 people who are going to vote for RP. I also know that everyone who will vote for him are not necessarily signed up here.
But let's assume that these 21,000 folks represent 10% (pick a number) of RP supporters. That translates to 210,000 real votes. Is that enough to win the GOP? What number is?
Sorry about my doom and gloom feelings here. Perhaps you folks have a better interpretation or more facts than I do.
What I do find interesting is that in all of these typical barbs being exchanged with candidates (i.e. Clinton/Barrack, Romney/Huckabee, Romney/Ghouliani etc), no one, and I mean no GOP candidate is choosing to spar with Ron Paul (other than the TV debates)....at least what MSM is reporting.
Unfortunately, this is how I see the average voter:
Has anyone else noticed this? It seems that MSM is co-ordinating a "divide and conquer" strategy for RP supporters.
I have seen more articles appearing these days talking about the "up and coming" challenger Mike Huckabee to the MSM favourites (Ghouliani and Romney). Take a look at this article.
In it, they construct sentences like:
"Add to that a new twist in Mike Huckabee. The former Arkansas governor is moving up in the polls in Iowa and is now within striking distance of Romney."
"Romney, who thought he had a lock on Iowa and New Hampshire, is now looking in his rearview mirror and seeing others. Huckabee is a threat in Iowa, and anything can happen after that in New Hampshire."
"Rudy Giuliani is not a major player in Iowa since he, along with John McCain, skipped the straw poll. But Giuliani is undoubtedly cheering Mike Huckabee on," said CNN's other senior political analyst, Bill Schneider.
"If Huckabee overtakes Mitt Romney in Iowa, it will be a serious, perhaps devastating, blow to Giuliani's toughest competitor."
In fact, Huckabee's name is cited 6 times in this article.
Only one mention of Ron Paul, again framing him as some sort of joke.
"In ring three: Fred Thompson and John McCain try to grab the spotlight with some daring moves on the trapeze. There is also a sideshow: Ron Paul. Step right up, folks," says Schneider.
I worry about RP. With all of the co-ordinated MSM attacks/suppression/spin being fired at RP, sometimes the obstacles seem so high.
I was looking at the teaparty07.com site and they only have about 21,000 people pledged to donate that day. OK, so I know for sure that there are 21,000 people who are going to vote for RP. I also know that everyone who will vote for him are not necessarily signed up here.
But let's assume that these 21,000 folks represent 10% (pick a number) of RP supporters. That translates to 210,000 real votes. Is that enough to win the GOP? What number is?
Sorry about my doom and gloom feelings here. Perhaps you folks have a better interpretation or more facts than I do.
What I do find interesting is that in all of these typical barbs being exchanged with candidates (i.e. Clinton/Barrack, Romney/Huckabee, Romney/Ghouliani etc), no one, and I mean no GOP candidate is choosing to spar with Ron Paul (other than the TV debates)....at least what MSM is reporting.
Unfortunately, this is how I see the average voter:
