What the media isn't telling you about Eric Dondero

Couldnt you just take a screen shot of your email open on your computer with his email address and a way to verify the Email address
 
I’d like to see us use issues like Prostitution and opposition to Seat Belt Laws as our top issues for the civil liberties.

If I could only drive without a seat belt on my way to a whorehouse, this would be a free country!!!
y-u-no-guy.jpg
 
Legalizing prostitution wouldn't help me, I don't have anything a prostitute wants :(

Nor a regular girl either apparently :( :(

Now if we could just get the summer of '67 back in vogue I might get lucky ;)
 
I still don't get it. We are attacking him for his pro-liberty beliefs as if these are the terrible things about him? um, OK.

If we are attacking the anti-Islam stuff, I guess that makes sense. Not sure how it hurts him.. or even why we need to hurt him considering no one cares what he has to say.

Aren't there some underground internet polls that need spamming?
 
I lolled at "Look what they are doing in Paris. Look at Amsterdam!"

I've been to a lot of places in the US and we have more freedom here in Amsterdam than anywhere I have visited, we have had a very large muslim minority here for a while and not much has changed in terms of freedom. I've talked about things like sharia law with a few muslims, and none of them liked the idea at all.
 
Any possibility it was Dondero behind some or all of the questionable newsletter content?
 
Here are a few more from him including ones where he defends Abu Gharib and torturing muslims. He also announced very publicly to the world that he is "circumscibed." If you doubt their authenticity, it was to a list that had probably several hundred subscribers so I'm sure there are other people out there with them. But if anyone in the media doubts it, why not ask Dondero directly? He's crazy enough he'd probably defend and openly claim them as his own.

From: Eric Dondero Rittberg
Date: Sat, 09 Sep 2006 6:41 pm
Subject: Re: Authoritarians are main force against Nudism in the world today


I'm circumscibed and I don't consider it "mutilation." Foreskin for a male is far, far, far, far different from clitoris for a female. Geez, did you learn anything in HS health class?

And Eric Rudolph. You know, you finally got one right. Yes, he was the perfect example of a "Christian Terrorist Hatemonger." I completely agree.

But Steven.......

ERIC RUDOLPH WAS 15 FRIGGIN' YEARS AGO!!!!

Can't you come up with a more recent example for your argument???


From: Eric Dondero Rittberg
Date: Sun, 28 Aug 2005 2:33 pm
Subject: Re: from bush with love


LOL. So, let me get this straight. You consider putting pink panties on the head of a captured soldier or making them do a cheerleader style acrobatic pile-up to be "torture?"

If that's your definition of torture, I'd hate to think how you would describe cutting people's tongues out and letting them bleed to death in town squares, tying peoples hands behind their backs and dropping them off the roofs of two-story buildings, electric shocks to testicles, and cutting heads off with dirty rusty unsharpened knives.

Hey, quick question.

If I my wife in a moment of sexual playfulness tosses her panties on my head, does that count as "torture?"

From: Eric Dondero Rittberg
Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2005 11:36 pm
Subject: Re: from bush with love


Do you consider parents spanking their children to be "torture"?

What's more harmful to a human being; a slap on the behind with a belt, paddle or large stick, or being humiliated by having to wear a pair of pink panties on one's head?

If you answer the latter, then you have to condemn about 80% of all American parents as "torturers".
 
From: Eric Dondero Rittberg
Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2005 9:07 pm
Subject: Re: Katrina shows War in Iraq a Great Positive for America, American Troops


You are truly nuts if you think panties on one's head constitutes "torture."

Why do you even call yourself a "libertarian." Save the rest of us the embarrassment and join the Michael Moore America Haters. You
and people like you are destroying our libertarian movement. Please go away.

From: Eric Dondero Rittberg
Date: Thu, 8 Sep 2005 11:18 pm
Subject: Re: Katrina shows War in Iraq a Great Positive for America, American Troops


You know, I think you and I were on the LP NatComm at the same time. I served in 1986 and 1987.

I was a hardcore Jim Turney-ite. Attended NatComm meetings in Baltimore, Los Angeles, and other cities.

Shame you equate putting panties on someone's head, with torture.

Does that mean if my wife throws some pink panties on my head late at night when she's being a bit playful, she's actually "torturing me?"
 
Okay here's some proof of their authenticity for anyone who wants it. Dondero is STILL talking about the same things today. He wrote this in the comment section of his blog last week.

http://www.libertarianrepublican.ne...showComment=1327520764635#c995721626924492937

Eric Dondero said...

Oh, and btw, you left out more importantly, DOESN'T LIKE TO BE TOLD TO WEAR A SEAT BELT IN HIS CAR BY THE FUCKING GOVERNMENT.

Far, far, far more important to me than smoking weed or having the right when I was in the Navy 30 years ago to visit prostitutes.
January 25, 2012 1:46 PM
 
his wife must be so proud!

Okay here's some proof of their authenticity for anyone who wants it. Dondero is STILL talking about the same things today. He wrote this in the comment section of his blog last week.

http://www.libertarianrepublican.ne...showComment=1327520764635#c995721626924492937

Eric Dondero said...

Oh, and btw, you left out more importantly, DOESN'T LIKE TO BE TOLD TO WEAR A SEAT BELT IN HIS CAR BY THE FUCKING GOVERNMENT.

Far, far, far more important to me than smoking weed or having the right when I was in the Navy 30 years ago to visit prostitutes.
January 25, 2012 1:46 PM
 
Last edited:
Okay here's some proof of their authenticity for anyone who wants it. Dondero is STILL talking about the same things today. He wrote this in the comment section of his blog last week.

http://www.libertarianrepublican.ne...showComment=1327520764635#c995721626924492937

Eric Dondero said...

Oh, and btw, you left out more importantly, DOESN'T LIKE TO BE TOLD TO WEAR A SEAT BELT IN HIS CAR BY THE FUCKING GOVERNMENT.

Far, far, far more important to me than smoking weed or having the right when I was in the Navy 30 years ago to visit prostitutes.
January 25, 2012 1:46 PM

Let me see if I've got this right...

It's more upsetting to him to be told to wear his seat belt
than to be told he's not allowed to have a medicinal herb that's better than 99% of prescription drugs....

The "click it or ticket!" law is more infuriating
than having your name printed in the paper for soliciting sex...

Yeah, I totally get that.
 
This confirms their authenticity. Someone asked Dondero about it directly on his blog this morning, and he admitted it outright. Again, nothing wrong with supporting legalized prostitution. But Dondero takes that to a whole new & apparently very personal level.

http://www.libertarianrepublican.ne...howComment=1327976344575#c8806258240500034874

Eric Dondero said...

Umm, yes, Michael is correct.

For the record: When I was in the Navy I had prostitutes in the Phillipines, Puerto Rico, and Spain.

I hope none of my readers of LR are shocked by that revelation.

Oh, and for the record: I do support legalization of prostitution.
 
This confirms their authenticity. Someone asked Dondero about it directly on his blog this morning, and he admitted it outright. Again, nothing wrong with supporting legalized prostitution. But Dondero takes that to a whole new & apparently very personal level.

http://www.libertarianrepublican.ne...howComment=1327976344575#c8806258240500034874

Eric Dondero said...

Umm, yes, Michael is correct.

For the record: When I was in the Navy I had prostitutes in the Phillipines, Puerto Rico, and Spain.

I hope none of my readers of LR are shocked by that revelation.

Oh, and for the record: I do support legalization of prostitution.

Personally I would just like to see screencaps of the email's regardless.
 
Now, just imagine if this guy still worked for Paul.

This stuff would be all over the airwaves.

Yup. It would be a top news story, and get at least a 5-10 minute segment. They would attack on the horrors of prostitution, the pimps making tons, and how drugs are involved around every corner...and that no good willed American citizen should want this.
Yet, because they used this guy AGAINST Paul, they can't discredit him now, because he is their own source and that would discredit them...though they already have lost that to many.
 
Let me see if I've got this right...
It's more upsetting to him to be told to wear his seat belt
than to be told he's not allowed to have a medicinal herb that's better than 99% of prescription drugs....
The "click it or ticket!" law is more infuriating
than having your name printed in the paper for soliciting sex...
Yeah, I totally get that.

That guy sounds crazy. At least with the click or ticket law, the most people are going to lose is some money. With prostitution & drugs, people can lose their freedom....sometimes for years. It's a lot easier to regain money after someone has robbed you, than to regain freedom after someone has imprisoned you.
 
The funniest part of all of this? Well, to me, at least.

Ron Paul spoke in favor of the legalization of prostitution (in so far as it is outlawed) in an interview with Stossel in 2007.
 
Back
Top