What if the new rules work FOR US?

Sematary

Member
Joined
Jun 21, 2007
Messages
6,428
I know this is a new thought, but what if they do? What IF Rand Paul is running in 2016, wins Iowa, then New Hampshire, etc... and builds momentum?
The GOP seems to like him and I like the way he votes.
What if the new rules make it possible for him to prevent the establishment from stopping HIM in 2016 instead of the other way around?

Wouldn't that be sweet irony?

Sometimes, in my opinion, you cut your nose off to spite your face.
 
All the harder they will work AGAINST that happening.

They have the power to do whatever they want.

Sorry to be so cynical.
 
All the harder they will work AGAINST that happening.

They have the power to do whatever they want.

Sorry to be so cynical.

Not to mention that in four more years we will be an even larger part of the party. Maybe by then we will be "they" but without the corruption. Then we can right the ship again.
 
I think it was pretty obvious that Rubio is the next chosen golden boy. Let rand continue the fight for liberty in the senate.
 
I think the trick is we have to have Rand Paul be an extremely obvious frontrunner. We have a few things working for us in this regard:

1. He'll be a great speaker.
2. He's handsome and sadly that's a big deal.
3. He has a great voting record.

4. We have time to prepare.
I'm already talking to my friends about Rand Paul. He's making it easy for me as well with his actions in support for hemp. Gotta be relevant to what your friends are interested in.
 
Why are we STILL so hung up on the rules? They weren't followed. They were changed, and they won't be followed.

If the rules mattered, Romney would be disqualified months ago.
If the rules mattered, Ron would have 27 states.
If the rules mattered, Ron would have won the popular vote in Iowa
If the rules mattered, Ron would have won the popular vote in New Hampshire
If the rules mattered, Ron would have won the popular vote in Maine



What rules?
 
If the rules don't change in regard to the grassroots, we're never going to be able to get another one of our people into office. At least not as a Republican.
 
Um, didn't they also insert a rule that says they can change the rules BETWEEN conventions by committee?
 
Right now we need to continue to focus on fanning the flames between the Tea Party types and the Establishment. That should be the priority. It has worked so far, don't get off message.
 
Are we going to turn to the dark side? We are the ones who believe in the rule of law, due process, and procedural fairness, not to mention representing the people.
 
Are we going to turn to the dark side? We are the ones who believe in the rule of law, due process, and procedural fairness, not to mention representing the people.

You are correct. Now we need people to learn good politics and get out there. Listen to Doug Wead's latest video interview with WeAreChange over and over again (the last half).
 
Last edited:
2. He's handsome and sadly that's a big deal.
The saying "handsome is as handsome does" applies here. But he *is* handsome in the physical sense, too - like his dad (actually, a little bit less).
 
LOL we could trick them into passing a rule that says candidates are only eligible for the nomination if their parent was a previous candidate for the nomination.
 
That's the great untold story here...

Whatever rules they make we will find a way to use them against them. It doesn't matter how tyrannical they get, we will find a way around them.
 
Back
Top