What Does Zbigniew Brzezinski Think Of Ron Paul?

[beardedlinen]

I had no idea that Mika was his daughter.

She'd be attractive if I didn't see her father's sociopathic globalist face every time I looked at her own.

 

[heavenlyboy34]

So what ? Stopping Communist aggression in Afghanistan was a good thing.
We boycotted the Moscow Olympics, you know.

Foreign intervention is not a good thing. The Soviets never had a chance in the 'stan. Same as the US. It will take longer for the US to crash in the 'stan because of fancier toys and such, but it will happen.

 

[beardedlinen]

So what ? Stopping Communist aggression in Afghanistan was a good thing.
We boycotted the Moscow Olympics, you know.

It was good when he basically formed and trained the Mujahadeen to stop Russia. It wasn't good when they subsequently morphed into al-Qaeda. Blowback's a bitch.

Just another example of disastrous interventionist policies.

 

[pastore1215]

Are you people serious???

Brezinski is an evil one world government semi-marxist who sits at the right hand of arch criminal David Rockefeller.

Zbig and Soros are the engineers of all these Marxist "protests" in the Arab world, Russia, and Occupy Wall Street....It goes without saying that these men would KILL Ron Paul before seeing him elected.

 

[pastore1215]

So what ? Stopping Communist aggression in Afghanistan was a good thing.
We boycotted the Moscow Olympics, you know.

Brezinski's interest in taking down the Soviets had nothing to do with "anti-Communism"....the idea was to crash the Soviet system and then roll up Russia into NATO and the EU NWO system.

The plan to rape and control post Soviet Russia was moving along fine, until one Vladimir Putin came along and said "Nyet" to the NWO.

 

[Mini-Me]

Brezinski's interest in taking down the Soviets had nothing to do with "anti-Communism"....the idea was to crash the Soviet system and then roll up Russia into NATO and the EU NWO system.

The plan to rape and control post Soviet Russia was moving along fine, until one Vladimir Putin came along and said "Nyet" to the NWO.

The worst part is, who do you even root for when it's tyrant vs. tyrant? :-/ I mean, I guess I'll root for the one who might only want to be the despotic ruler of one nation instead of the whole world, but...blah. I'm not even convinced of that though: The Soviets wanted global domination as well, and it would be silly to think all of the former Communists and KGB guys in charge had a genuine change of heart overnight when the USSR fell. Realistically, I wouldn't be surprised if guys like Putin just want a different version of the NWO with different people in charge. I see dragons everywhere, lol.

 

[Peace&Freedom]

Brzezinski was and is nothing more than a speakerphone, for David Rockefeller on the other end. He's a mouthpiece for the establishment, and a technocrat ("a bureaucrat who knows how to cook the books," as per Celente's definition) who implements the globalist strategems. If he opposed the Iraq war, it was because he feels it wasted US resources better spent elsewhere containing China, Russia and other major challengers to US hegemony. He is the ultimate interventionist, plotting for decades to systematically meddle in the entire world's sovereign affairs to manipulate into place the global order the insiders want. He is the anti-Ron Paul.

 

[Student Of Paulism]

The plan to rape and control post Soviet Russia was moving along fine, until one Vladimir Putin came along and said "Nyet" to the NWO.

Lol yea. Putin despises the US with a passion, as well as all the NWO/Illuminati garbage. Most of the old timers in Russia and who served during the time of the USSR, have a major hatred toward us still, because they know more of the truth now with how exactly they fell apart, even though they have themselves to blame for letting it happen. There is this myth sometimes that 'Russia and the US are best of buddies now.' The sheep out there just autmatically assume since Russia is more 'westernized' that they and the US hold hands now and sing Kumbaya togther. That couldnt be farther from the truth. For starters, they were in turmoil for years since 91, and even today are still hurting from that and not fully recovered yet. They only 'tolerate' us right now, but they wont be a puppet nor take orders, and they dont make threats. When they say they will do something, they will do it.

Take 08 in Georgia for example. Cheney's stupid ass couldnt resist sending in troops there (probably a directive from a Ziggy-like figure, i am sure. As always, we have to get involved in a war that had NOTHING to do with us. We land, and immediately are told by Russian top defense chiefs 'Ok, you have 12 hours to get the fuck out of here, or we are rolling in missiles and pointing them right at you'. The Troops were gone immediately lol.

Fast forward to 2 weeks ago. 5th fleet was getting too close to the Straits Of Hormuz (war game test crap, etc), and Russian gun ships said 'Go any further, it will be considered aggression on us too'. Fleet backed off lmao.

So yea, i think it is safe to say that Russia is not a country that will be kissing globalist ass any time soon. Neither will the Chinese.

Btw, Putin still pulls a ton of weight in Russia, i even heard Medvedev takes orders from him still. I also read he is trying to get his old job back too, something about him trying to get reelected.

 

[donnay]

So what ? Stopping Communist aggression in Afghanistan was a good thing.
We boycotted the Moscow Olympics, you know.

Because we had no business funding the Mujahideen or any of that. Who are now our enemy--the Taliban and Al Qaeda.

 

[agorist ninja]

This thread is a troll job, right? A poor attempt at humor, maybe?

Why on earth would anyone think that attempting to associate Ron with Brzezinski is even close to a good idea?

I wonder about people here and their motives sometimes. Hard not to.

 

[Occam's Banana]

Foreign intervention is not a good thing. The Soviets never had a chance in the 'stan. Same as the US. It will take longer for the US to crash in the 'stan because of fancier toys and such, but it will happen.

QFT.

They don't call Afghanistan "The Graveyard of Empires" for nothing.

 

[Anti Federalist]

Shut up, ya conspiracy nut, yer making all of us look bad.

/s/

Absolutely! He is the very shadow government Dr. Paul is trying to expose!

Brzezinski backed and funded Bin Laden and the Mujahideen in the early 80's.

President Jimmy Carter's National Security Advisor, Zbigniew Brzezinski visiting 'his boy', Osama Bin Laden, in training with the Pakistan Army, 1981. Photo originally published in Stern magazine. Photo credited to the Sygma/Corbis agency, Paris.

People need to read his book: The Grand Chessboard

Sources:
http://www.scribd.com/doc/12834177/How-Jimmy-Carter-and-I-Started-the-Mujahideen
http://therealnews.com/t2/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=31&Itemid=74&jumival=4695
http://www.scribd.com/doc/2624700/B...Primacy-and-Its-Geostrategic-Imperatives-1997

 

[LibertyEagle]

I second that! Brzezinski is the quintessential insiders insider. An elites best friend. IMO

^^^
THIS!!!!!!!!!!!!!

 

[donnay]

QFT.

They don't call Afghanistan "The Graveyard of Empires" for nothing.

Could be that Russia is funding the Taliban this time--a tit for a tat.

 

[nedomedo]

He is one of the biggest pieces of crap in the world. Skip it 1:42 to hear his famous quote that pertains to us.

 

[Snowball]

It was good when he basically formed and trained the Mujahadeen to stop Russia. It wasn't good when they subsequently morphed into al-Qaeda. Blowback's a bitch.

Just another example of disastrous interventionist policies.

ok, I can understand non-intervention including no help for the Afghan patriots of the 1970s and 1980s
who fought Soviet aggression into their lands, but when you talk about "al-Queda", you lose me.
Bottom line, the US could have left Afghanistan alone, left Iraq alone, and there would have been
no "blowback". I'm talking about AFTER the repulsion of Soviet forces.
Know that you're conversing with someone here who does not believe Osama Bin Laden had
anything at all to do with 9/11.

 

[Occam's Banana]

Could be that Russia is funding the Taliban this time--a tit for a tat.

I wouldn't be surprised. Sauce for the goose ...

 

[heavenlyboy34]

Could be that Russia is funding the Taliban this time--a tit for a tat.

Could be, but the current majority party in both the legislature and federal executive are held primarily by members of the United Russia party. From what I've read, this a "centrist" sort of party and probably wouldn't be interested in such a proxy war. (like all republics though, we don't really know what goes on behind the scenes, so your guess is as good as mine)

 

[heavenlyboy34]

ok, I can understand non-intervention including no help for the Afghan patriots of the 1970s and 1980s
who fought Soviet aggression into their lands, but when you talk about "al-Queda", you lose me.
Bottom line, the US could have left Afghanistan alone, left Iraq alone, and there would have been
no "blowback". I'm talking about AFTER the repulsion of Soviet forces.
Know that you're conversing with someone here who does not believe Osama Bin Laden had
anything at all to do with 9/11.

The FBI doesn't either.

 

[Chrysamere]

Not sure if OP is trolling...