What Does Zbigniew Brzezinski Think Of Ron Paul?

Zbigniew Brzezinski "Its easier to kill a million people...than it is to control them" @ around 6:55 in video.




Personal note: In this video Brzezinski talks about the political awakening of man-kind around the globe.
 
Just play any Bill Kristol video and pretend you're hearing it with a Russian accent.

Yea, Kristol is easy to picture with a soviet uniform, with an ushanka and trench.

Here is something i seen the other day though, for those of you that missed it. I have to say, C-Span is great when it comes to free speech, and this guy's call here made my day. Just look at Kristol's face and how he is buckling under pressure and trying to hide showing how he really feels, knowing his bs is being exposed more and more each day. Then he tries to make up some bs lie about Ron during the call, it had to be the weakest attempt i've seen. Honestly, these people have no ammo left at all, and it's pathetic (but also wonderful) to see them squirm like the snakes they are.

 
Ziggy is a lot more for peace than most of you realize.
He opposed Iraq War and opposes millitary action against Iran.
He was the primary ideological opponent to Henry Kissinger for a generation.
See this link, scroll down:
http://polandusa2007.blogspot.com/2007/10/zbigniew-brzezinski-on-iraqiran-and-4.html

and most recently, he has a new book out.
A*longtime*foe*of Israel’s partisans in the United States, he says the Obama team “fumbled by getting outmaneuvered by the Israelis.” Then he gets blunter: “Domestic politics interceded: The Israelis have a lot of influence with Congress, and in some cases they are able to buy influence.”
http://www.salon.com/2012/01/20/zbig_israelis_bought_influence_and_outmaneuvered_obama/singleton/
 
Brzezinski is Polish/American. Let's at least get that accurate.

People give Ronald Reagan much of the credit for bringing down the Soviet Union, but Zig had a big hand in it.
 
Isn't he for an end to US sovereignty in favor of world government, like Rockefeller? I doubt he thinks highly of Ron.
 
Last edited:
Lol of course he is an advocate of peace...WHEN IT IS DONE HIS WAY or 'THEIR' WAY. Sure, ill agree he does say some very refreshing things. The man is extremely shrewd and knowledgable, and a walking encyclopedia on anything geopolitical and world affairs. He is also a eugenics master and expert strategist on how to implement them. His message may seem 'right', but at the same, if you listen to him talk, you can see what his goals are. Hell, just listen to some of the vids in the OPs first post. He talks about how Iran was actually involved with us in 02 after the Taliban was put to sleep and that it was Iran who called for the country to become a democracy. This is all true, we have had our chances to talk with them, move forward and set things right, but why is it that it never pans out? There is a lot he doesn't make known.

When he talked about the Arab Springs. the revolutions going on, look at how many times he has to mention 'global strategy', global efforts', etc. Plus he talks about the democracies and revolutions as if they are a bad thing or some kind of threat, i mean, yea, god forbid people want to rise up against the bs that we started in the first place :rolleyes: He talks about colonialism from the europeans being there and that the US was seen as a friendly ally to help liberate them, but again, that is pure BS. What he doesnt tell you, is that WE HELPED THE UK fuck Iran up in the early 50s, with their fight with the UK over their oil rights. Rather than play mediator and not get involved directly, we screwed Iran over, sided with the UK, put some harsh dictator in their who served our interest, and eventually the got sick of it and revolted. The objective now is to basically 'rinse and repeat' that cycle.

His story on the Russians/Afghanis is kinda hazy too. Yea, we armed them, but it wasnt to really help them. It was nothing more than a proxy war to dupe the soviets into getting their asses kicked, and was a brilliant plan when you think about it lol. What he doesn't tell you is the Mujahideen and Al-CIA'eda are his (and others) own creation in the first place. They are are no different than us being surrogates for IL and fighting their holy proxy wars against the goyim. :rolleyes: They were formed to do the same thing, as they did in Libya (now in Syria) to stabilize all these Arab Springs, and get the dictators out who wont brown nose us anymore, and put someone in who will. The same cycle over and over with these guys.
 
Last edited:
I had no idea that Mika was his daughter.

Me either! Wow, this changes my opinion of her... drastically! Brzezinski is a vile, evil man in the higher circles of NWO globalism. This man is one of the biggest enemies to Freedom that we know about. Up there with Henry Kissinger.
 
One of Ron's suggested books to read is A Century of War: Anglo-American Oil Politics and the New World Order by F. William Engdahl. Going through that book and searching Brzezinski will bring up some important facts. Not saying everything is 100% accurate, but it gives you a taste of the man we are talking about here:

- Attended 1973 Bildergerg meeting. (p. 134)
- National security advisor to Carter & member of Trilateral Commission - practically ran Jimmy Carter foreign policy (p. 166/279)
- Responsible for overthrowing Shah of Iran and took credit for it (p. 171)
- New China policy of giving military aid and technology access to Communist China (p. 174)
- Helped orchestrate and contain news involving Three Mile Island incident, to assure dependence upon oil (p. 176)
- Worked with Kissinger and advised Bush I presidency, openly advocating global empire in the name of spreading worldwide democracy (p. 232)
- Was a well-paid lobbyist who represented BP oil interests (p. 241)
- Was the first executive director of the Trilateral Commission (1973) and long-time friend/right-hand man of David Rockefeller (p. 277):
The Trilateral Commission attempted for the first time in postwar Anglo-American history to draw Japanese finance and business elites into the Anglo-American policy consensus formation. In 1976, Henry Kissinger changed places with Brzezinski, becoming Trilateral director while Brzezinski assumed Kissinger’s job as National Security Adviser to the new president, Jimmy Carter, himself a member of the semisecret Trilateral Commission group, as were many of his key cabinet secretaries.
 
Last edited:
Neocon lexicon:

peace = your submission to my aggression

Lol of course he is an advocate of peace...WHEN IT IS DONE HIS WAY or 'THEIR' WAY. Sure, ill agree he does say some very refreshing things. The man is extremely shrewd and knowledgable, and a walking encyclopedia on anything geopolitical and world affairs. He is also a eugenics master and expert strategist on how to implement them. His message may seem 'right', but at the same, if you listen to him talk, you can see what his goals are. Hell, just listen to some of the vids in the OPs first post. He talks about how Iran was actually involved with us in 02 after the Taliban was put to sleep and that it was Iran who called for the country to become a democracy. This is all true, we have had our chances to talk with them, move forward and set things right, but why is it that it never pans out? There is a lot he doesn't make known.

When he talked about the Arab Springs. the revolutions going on, look at how many times he has to mention 'global strategy', global efforts', etc. Plus he talks about the democracies and revolutions as if they are a bad thing or some kind of threat, i mean, yea, god forbid people want to rise up against the bs that we started in the first place :rolleyes: He talks about colonialism from the europeans being there and that the US was seen as a friendly ally to help liberate them, but again, that is pure BS. What he doesnt tell you, is that WE HELPED THE UK fuck Iran up in the early 50s, with their fight with the UK over their oil rights. Rather than play mediator and not get involved directly, we screwed Iran over, sided with the UK, put some harsh dictator in their who served our interest, and eventually the got sick of it and revolted. The objective now is to basically 'rinse and repeat' that cycle.

His story on the Russians/Afghanis is kinda hazy too. Yea, we armed them, but it wasnt to really help them. It was nothing more than a proxy war to dupe the soviets into getting their asses kicked, and was a brilliant plan when you think about it lol. What he doesn't tell you is the Mujarehideen and Al-CIA'eda are his (and others) own creation in the first place. They are are no different than us being surrogates for IL and fighting their holy proxy wars against the goyim. :rolleyes: They were formed to do the same thing, as they did in Libya (now in Syria) to stabilize all these Arab Springs, and get the dictators out who wont brown nose us anymore, and put someone in who will. The same cycle over and over with these guys.
 
He was national security advisor for Carter admin. Insider, globalist, elitist, eugenisist, all around bad guy.

Absolutely! He is the very shadow government Dr. Paul is trying to expose!

Brzezinski backed and funded Bin Laden and the Mujahideen in the early 80's.

68772847_0c7ec4471c_z.jpg

President Jimmy Carter's National Security Advisor, Zbigniew Brzezinski visiting 'his boy', Osama Bin Laden, in training with the Pakistan Army, 1981. Photo originally published in Stern magazine. Photo credited to the Sygma/Corbis agency, Paris.

People need to read his book: The Grand Chessboard

Sources:
http://www.scribd.com/doc/12834177/How-Jimmy-Carter-and-I-Started-the-Mujahideen
http://therealnews.com/t2/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=31&Itemid=74&jumival=4695
http://www.scribd.com/doc/2624700/B...Primacy-and-Its-Geostrategic-Imperatives-1997
 
Me either! Wow, this changes my opinion of her... drastically! Brzezinski is a vile, evil man in the higher circles of NWO globalism. This man is one of the biggest enemies to Freedom that we know about. Up there with Henry Kissinger.

Which points out how controlled the media is.
 
"Was a well-paid lobbyist who represented BP oil interests (p. 241)"

Anybody know more details about this alleged relationship?
 
Back
Top