Seems like banning Trump was the best decision for their stock price, keeps going up. Pretty amazing, over 40% jump in price few days after banning Trump.
Twitter will probably do very well in the short run. In the long run, they will lose to a platform that does not censor.
If I had access to infinite cash, I could make the price of Twitter be anything I wanted it to be. So these statistics are meaningless.
Some stock price manipulation theories were surfacing in social media but there is no clear connection based on MSM reporting suggesting that this 40% jump in price few days after Trump ban was part of alleged coordinated '
coup effort' by pro-wars deep neocons or such lobbies.
CNBC: Peter Najarian says he bought Twitter Calls during show
Jim Cramer Says Twitter Stock Is Going to $100
Feb 10, 2021 TV-G
The company reported fourth-quarter revenue and offered an upbeat outlook even as Twitter missed Wall Street's estimates for audience growth. Twitter reporter net income of $222 million, or 27 cents per share, up from $119 million, 15 cents per share a year ago. Excluding items, Twitter earned 38 cents per share.
"2020 was an extraordinary year for Twitter. We are more proud than ever to serve the public conversation, especially in these unprecedented times," Jack Dorsey, Twitter's CEO, said in a statement. "Our product changes to date are promoting healthier conversations for those who use our service, including advertiser
Jim Cramer’s Mad Memory
By Michael Corcoran
November 2, 2009
In his new book, CNBC’s shamed business expert ostensibly forgets a decade’s worth of duplicity and failures.
“What, me worry?” Cramer gets grilled by Jon Stewart (AP/Jason DeCrow)
One of the more disturbing aspects of American punditry is that failure and poor analysis are so often rewarded. Pundits who were wrong about the war in Iraq, for example, were routinely given promotions, space on the country’s most read op-ed pages, and face time on television. William Kristol took the term wrong to new levels in 2002 and 2003, yet was granted plum gigs with the
New York Times and the
Washington Post. There is an entire Wikipedia page devoted to
Times columnist Tom Friedman’s woeful miscalculations on Iraq. Peter Beinart,
New Republic editor and a staunch supporter of the war, snagged himself a fellowship from the Council of Foreign Relations and a book deal. And on it goes. Everywhere you look in the world of media, those who got it wrong have stayed on as dominant voices in the public sphere.
To begin with, Cramer’s history of ethical lapses is fairly long. In 2000, he had a dust-up with Fox News. The news outlet complained, according to the Associated Press, that “[Cramer] promoted [his company’s] stock on the air.” Six years later, in a now widely circulated interview, Cramer boasted of his ability to manipulate the market through misinformation. "What’s important when you are in that hedge fund mode is to not do anything remotely truthful, because the truth is so against your view that it’s important to create a new truth, to develop a fiction,” he said, sounding very different from the man who just wants to give “honest advice.” He then recommended skirting laws, saying, “
You can’t foment. That’s a violation … But you do it anyway because the SEC doesn’t understand it.”
genprogress.org/jim-cramers-mad-memory/
CNBC anchor’s stock trading fraud isn’t stupid, it’s blatant. And he isn’t the only one doing it
15 Jan, 2021
newslaundry.com/2021/01/15/cnbc-anchors-stock-trading-fraud-isnt-stupid-its-blatant-and-he-isnt-the-only-one-doing-it
Potentially Related
Developing....
Do Wall Street exchanges computers have
latest anti-virus installed?
