What are the chances that every District in California votes proportionately?????????

[Ex Post Facto]

http://vote.ss.ca.gov/Returns/rcd/all.htm

What are the chances? Something is up, very wrong.

 

[undergroundrr]

I saw this mentioned at LRC. Anybody know what the statistical chances really are that such a uniform result would happen in all districts except one? It's pretty creepy to look at.

Interesting that Duncan Hunter's District 52 is the ugly duckling.

 

[Thanehand]

That's f'ed up. No way.

 

[Thanehand]

Has anyone sent these to the campaign? Are they aware of it?

 

[mahopaul]

[

What are the chances?

50%?

I'm give up. What are they?

 

[Ex Post Facto]

I have no idea what the chances are. Isn't it odd though?

 

[Neomatrix]

They are all robots.

 

[homah]

I don't understand this thread. In what way was voting done "proportionally"?

 

[Ex Post Facto]

Look at the link. All votes per district in California are proportional to each other. It takes the graph to see it. Nobody did better in any district, nobody did worse. The votes were proportionally spread.

 

[jillian]

i looked at the link and i don't get it

 

[jillian]

okay, i just looked again.

if you scroll through it and just look at the graphs, they definitely look similar

 

[Ex Post Facto]

The graph looks like:

---
-----
--
-
---------
---

Across the entire state.

 

[boondoggle]

. . . Did we not see Michigan's results?

 

[jillian]

The graph looks like:

---
-----
--
-
---------
---

Across the entire state.

yes, you are right

i was looking at the numbers

it would be nice if you could rotate it and compare in a different way

 

[nate895]

http://vote.ss.ca.gov/Returns/rcd/all.htm

What are the chances? Something is up, very wrong.

I used to live in District 11, and I can tell you right that unless have changed very rapidly there in the past few years, it did not vote for McCain. I mean if not the conservative factor, there are a ton of Mormons.

 

[MrZach]

there is pretty good variance in those results...

 

[slacker921]

There's very little variation between all of the districts. The same thing happened in SC and FL... and in NH the ratio of votes for each candidate held almost exactly the same throughout the night despite early votes coming in from different areas of the state (different demographics) from the later ones. i.e. the numbers just don't have the chaos of real votes. Rural areas vote differently than urban areas..

However, districts are supposed to be constructed so that they each have close to the same amount of rural/urban, minority/white, etc makeup so they should have similar voting results.. but.... those results are a bit extreme.. the people of Southern California voted almost exactly the same as those in Northern California? huh? The people of Santa Cruz voted within a couple of percentage points the same as those in LA? huh?

The question is, what do the people of California think of this? Are any journalists investigating this? Will the people of California demand the removal of the evil Diebolds?

And..... all those Paul supporters who voted by paper ballot and didn't have them counted on Tuesday - will your votes ever be counted?

 

[Ex Post Facto]

there is pretty good variance in those results...

I agree there is some degree of variances, however, it appears when taken in totality nobody had a better district than anyone else. It's something to note.