DirtMcGirt
Member
- Joined
- Dec 2, 2007
- Messages
- 2,721
Nice find Revolutinary8, You should start a thread with that chart...
He DOESN'T keep his hands to himself, in fact, he is in everybody's business but his own. He has singlehandedly turned the State of our Nation in to some sort of sick joke. He is no Richard Pryor, and he is no Dave Chapelle, and he sure as hell is no George Carlin, but he sure thinks he is.
Did you see him as "George Bush's Double"? It was disgusting. It is a whitewash. "George Bush is Dumb" "George Bush is a failure"
Try again Steve:
George Bush is wicked smart.
George Bush has achieved most everything he has set out to do- and in record time. Better than any of his "predecessors".
He DOESN'T keep his hands to himself, in fact, he is in everybody's business but his own. He has singlehandedly turned the State of our Nation in to some sort of sick joke. He is no Richard Pryor, and he is no Dave Chapelle, and he sure as hell is no George Carlin, but he sure thinks he is.
Did you see him as "George Bush's Double"? It was disgusting. It is a whitewash. "George Bush is Dumb" "George Bush is a failure"
Try again Steve:
George Bush is wicked smart.
George Bush has achieved most everything he has set out to do- and in record time. Better than any of his "predecessors".
George Bush's double? I haven't seen that, and I think you're thinking of the wrong person. Do you have a link.
There is however, this legendary performance from the White House Correspondents Dinner. Considering the venue, I consider it one of the best speeches in American history. It took enormous balls to pull off, and he nails it. At one point, he criticized reporters for likening Mr. Bush's recent staff changes to "rearranging the deck chairs on the Titanic." "This administration is not sinking," Mr. Colbert said; "this administration is soaring. If anything, they are rearranging the deck chairs on the Hindenburg."
We are speaking of the same thing. Yes, I saw it. It was a whitewash IMO.
Different Strokes, Different folks?
I have a MUCH different perspective. George Bushco. chose him, you realize, right? Once again, ANYONE who has any significant amount of MSM "play" should be scrutinized.
Have you clicked on the link? There was a guy that night that impersonated Bush that was George Bush's Double. That wasn't Stephen Colbert. The Bush Administration and the Press Corp absolutely did not know what Stephen Colbert was about when they let him do that. It was a huge mistake. The people in the room hated the speech and the media ignored it. Of course, the speech gained its popularity on the internet.
Again, it was one of the best speeches in American history. He slams the sitting President, the press corp (for their lack of questioning of the administration), and others in the room. They had no clue what hit them.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stephe...hite_House_Correspondents'_Association_Dinner
A couple points from wiki
Several of Bush's aides and supporters walked out during Colbert's speech, and one former aide commented that the President had "that look that he's ready to blow".[25] Although President Bush shook Colbert's hand after his presentation, Colbert received an icy response from First Lady Laura Bush.[14][3]
Even though Colbert's performance "landed with a thud" among the live audience,[7] a clip of Colbert at the dinner became an overnight sensation, turning into a viral video that spread across numerous Web sites in various forms, with the sites that offered the video seeing massive increases in their traffic.
Another quote from the performance
“I stand by this man. I stand by this man because he stands for things. Not only for things, he stands on things. Things like aircraft carriers and rubble and recently flooded city squares. And that sends a strong message, that no matter what happens to America, she will always rebound—with the most powerfully staged photo ops in the world."
That chart is missing the Illuminati, Elders of Zion, Freemasonry, and the Reptilians.
He is a communist/Fabian socialist. But nowadays, I equate the two, (Bob Barr/WAR) so, is there any significance in the comment? I don't think so.He did say on his show he is a Libertarian. I don't know if he meant that.
He is a communist/Fabian socialist. But nowadays, I equate the two, (Bob Barr/WAR) so, is there any significance in the comment? I don't think so.
He is an ACTOR. Period. .
I haven't watched him regularly. (nor for a long time now).
But clearly his character came from Jon Stewart's show. He is playing Bill O'Reilly.
As a parody.
ouch.That was the WORST of the attacks in regards to his "Mission Accomplished" scam.
Not a whitewash at all.
![]()
Colbert said:I am appalled to be surrounded by the liberal media that is destroying America, with the exception of Fox News. Fox News gives you both sides of every story: the president's side, and the vice president's side.
But the rest of you, what are you thinking, reporting on NSA wiretapping or secret prisons in eastern Europe? Those things are secret for a very important reason: they're super-depressing. And if that's your goal, well, misery accomplished. Over the last five years you people were so good -- over tax cuts, WMD intelligence, the effect of global warming. We Americans didn't want to know, and you had the courtesy not to try to find out. Those were good times, as far as we knew.
But, listen, let's review the rules. Here's how it works: the president makes decisions. He's the decider. The press secretary announces those decisions, and you people of the press type those decisions down. Make, announce, type. Just put 'em through a spell check and go home. Get to know your family again. Make love to your wife. Write that novel you got kicking around in your head. You know, the one about the intrepid Washington reporter with the courage to stand up to the administration. You know - fiction!
Because really, what incentive do these people have to answer your questions, after all? I mean, nothing satisfies you. Everybody asks for personnel changes. So the White House has personnel changes. Then you write, "Oh, they're just rearranging the deck chairs on the Titanic." First of all, that is a terrible metaphor. This administration is not sinking. This administration is soaring. If anything, they are rearranging the deck chairs on the Hindenburg!
Rich Little said:Little said, ‘I won’t even mention the word Iraq. It’s not appropriate. You just want to be entertaining.... I won’t do anything close to over the line.’ He added, ‘They said, from ...,’ he paused, without finishing the sentence. ‘They thought my approach was more appropriate for their kind of thing. They don’t want Bill Maher or a comedian who’s going to be biting and perhaps knock the president in any way.’”
In an interview with the Washington Post’s Paul Farhi, Little made the same point: “One of the reasons they picked me is because I’m not controversial.... They did get some flak about the guy they had last year. I don’t think they wanted someone political or controversial again.”
Stephen Colbert is a socialist, so he can laugh himself all way to his inflated currency / bank all he wants.
Have you listened to this man? HIS OWN WORDS are proof. WHO HE WORKS FOR is proof.Maybe he is, but do you have sources for this accusation?