"We're gonna have a second reconciliation package in the fall, and a third in the spring of next year...AND we're gonna have recission packages."

[CaptUSA]

Cutting government spending isn't pro growth if you don't remove the hidden taxes that are built into the government that ARE government spending.

These are the things that our supposed friends like Elon Musk were really pissed off at for losing. Like the $7500 dollars per electric vehicle that got removed in the spending bill.

Listen, I don't want to pile on because everyone is calling you stupid right now... But a smarter person may consider the fact that other people think he's an idiot and what that might mean. Or, as Tulsa suggests, you're a bot. Either way, I'll be the bigger person.

 

[otherone]

Listen, I don't want to pile on because everyone is calling you stupid right now... But a smarter person may consider the fact that other people think he's an idiot and what that might mean. Or, as Tulsa suggests, you're a bot. Either way, I'll be the bigger person.

Well, after this discussion, and many others, I am SHOCKED to discover that DJT isn't a libertarian.
I'm literally shaking.

 

[nikcers]

Listen, I don't want to pile on because everyone is calling you stupid right now... But a smarter person may consider the fact that other people think he's an idiot and what that might mean. Or, as Tulsa suggests, you're a bot. Either way, I'll be the bigger person.

You insult me and then say you are the bigger person?

Listen explain to me how its not a tax if the government regulates the amount of houses built while simultaneously doesnt enforce immigration laws?

Thats the hidden tax that you have to fix first before all other taxes.

You might be able to sell a bottle of water for 500,000 dollars if you are in the middle of the desert and there are no other sources of water but that's not because of capitalism. Its because the government taxed all the other water in the land until it was a desert.

 

[oyarde]

Well, after this discussion, and many others, I am SHOCKED to discover that DJT isn't a libertarian.
I'm literally shaking.

I predict yer next president will not be as well.

 

[CaptUSA]

You insult me and then say you are the bigger person?

No, No... I said I didn't want to pile on. Read it again. I went out of my way to NOT insult you.

 

[nikcers]

I predict yer next president will not be as well.

That's a pretty good bet to make the 3rd party loses over 99% of the time.

 

[nikcers]

No, No... I said I didn't want to pile on. Read it again. I went out of my way to NOT insult you.

Well I usually take the insults as a compliment and I was trying to bait you there.

Just let when someone says you sound like chatGPT its a compliment to me.

Those algorithms are trained on the work of the smartest people in the history of the world.

 

[CaptUSA]

Well I usually take the insults as a compliment and I was trying to bait you there.

Just let when someone says you sound like chatGPT its a compliment to me.

Those algorithms are trained on the work of the smartest people in the history of the world.

Ahh... English is not your first language huh? Maybe you could share what is?

 

[nikcers]

Ahh... English is not your first language huh? Maybe you could share what is?

I speak American. Its sort of like English's bastard cousin.

 

[otherone]

I predict yer next president will not be as well.

IT'S TIME FOR A MASSIE MONEY BOMB!

I just rolled up 5k and flushed it down the toilet. Straight to campaign headquarters.

 

[acptulsa]

Ahh... English is not your first language huh? Maybe you could share what is?

The damned thing actually explained to us how it chose which grammatic errors to make, like refusing to use apostrophes. I guess the LLM programmers consider that "style" or something.

 

[ARealConservative]

No the whole country has twice the amount of people compared to 1964.

yes, and more people means it would cost less per person to fund things dipshit.

Imagine 4 people sharing rent vs 2 people Einstein....but now imagine it on an economy of scale like you suggested

unlike the others, I am going to pile on. you are a moron. dumbest guy in any room you walk into.

I used California as an example but the whole country is like that.

blabbering on like an imbecile

 

[acptulsa]

unlike the others, I am going to pile on. you are a moron. dumbest guy in any room you walk into.

Computers always are, aren't they? All the information known to date, and they can't make heads nor tails out of it.

Isn't it a nice thing @Bryan is doing for its developers by refusing to ban their tireless artificial "intelligence" wind-up toy?

 

[nikcers]

yes, and more people means it would cost less per person to fund things dipshit.

Imagine 4 people sharing rent vs 2 people Einstein....but now imagine it on an economy of scale like you suggested

unlike the others, I am going to pile on. you are a moron. dumbest guy in any room you walk into.




blabbering on like an imbecile

How many people do you rent your bedroom to?

Your answer isnt a slick as you think it is.

They wouldn't have been renting out hotel rooms to house migrants if housing was available.

 

[ARealConservative]

How many people do you rent your bedroom to?

Your answer isnt a slick as you think it is.

They wouldn't have been renting out hotel rooms to house migrants if housing was available.

the only point you have is on the top of your head

If the purpose of government remains the same - protect individual rights - the cost to do so per person goes down as population goes up

But you ignore the real reasons we went from spending $400 per person to $20k per- because like I said - dumbest guy in the room = you

 

[nikcers]

the only point you have is on the top of your head

If the purpose of government remains the same - protect individual rights - the cost to do so per person goes down as population goes up

But you ignore the real reasons we went from spending $400 per person to $20k per- because like I said - dumbest guy in the room = you

If you have to pay employees to do work and the cost of living is higher the amount you pay them has to be higher unless you use slaves.

 

[ARealConservative]

If you have to pay employees to do work and the cost of living is higher the amount you pay them has to be higher unless you use slaves.

nothing you say is correct

We had less houses per person in the 50's.

Houses were smaller, yet more people lived in them on average. Today they keep getting bigger and bigger, and we have less occupants per house

You blame illegals for rising home costs, which is idiotic. We import slave labor goods and illegal employment to hide the true inflation costs.

During the industrial revolution thanks to human capital - costs went way way down. You will never see this again - and people like you are to blame

We have experienced a computer revolution, and now an AI revolution - costs should again go way, way down - but they don't - and you are blaming the wrong forces - because you are the problem, not the solution

 

[nikcers]

nothing you say is correct

We had less houses per person in the 50's.

Houses were smaller, yet more people lived in them on average. Today they keep getting bigger and bigger, and we have less occupants per house

You blame illegals for rising home costs, which is idiotic. We import slave labor goods and illegal employment to hide the true inflation costs.

During the industrial revolution thanks to human capital - costs went way way down. You will never see this again - and people like you are to blame

We have experienced a computer revolution, and now an AI revolution - costs should again go way, way down - but they don't - and you are blaming the wrong forces - because you are the problem, not the solution

Costs are determined by energy prices and food costs and housing prices and supply and demand of those finite resources.

Our country makes sure those resources available for a lot of the world by ensuring the global supply chains are full of supply and that shipping is secured.

When supply is low people hoard more supply and prices go up. Billions of people have access to things like energy and food because of this.

Food prices and energy prices would skyrocket and there would be shortages globally if it werent for the USA. Many people would starve to death.

What we havent done is make sure housing supply is at levels that demand doesnt drive housing prices up.

The market is cornered and algorithms allow the pricing to be fixed.

So no matter how much more people earn effectively they are paying for it in housing costs.

Even if you happen to own your house the price of everything you buy has housing costs built into it.

When you go to Costco the employees make 30 dollars per hour in California but because of housing costs they dont have much money to spend on anything else.

 

[ARealConservative]

Costs are determined by energy prices and food costs and housing prices and supply and demand of those finite resources.

you claimed a housing shortage is the problem. We have more houses per person today

everything you say is retarded or simply the opposite of reality

you are a mouth breather that coopted a freedom movement. sucks for us

 

[nikcers]

you claimed a housing shortage is the problem. We have more houses per person today

everything you say is retarded or simply the opposite of reality

you are a mouth breather that coopted a freedom movement. sucks for us

We have housing shortages.

People in familys share houses.

Thats normal.

You dont let a 32 year old migrant share a bedroom with your 14 year old daughter.