Welfare/child support used to buy winning lottery ticket

tod evans

Member
Joined
Jan 3, 2008
Messages
36,071
An "unemployed" person regardless of sex or familial obligations has used monies they didn't earn to play the lottery.

Betcha a cyber nickel that she doesn't even offer to split her winnings with those who financed her gambling....

I'd bet another cyber nickle that the courts will uphold all standing "child support" orders levied against her ex(s)....




Single mother of 4 revealed as one of three $564M Powerball jackpot winners

http://www.foxnews.com/us/2015/02/2...ird-564m-powerball-jackpot/?intcmp=latestnews

A single mother of four from a small North Carolina town came forward Monday as one of three winners in a huge Powerball jackpot drawn earlier this month.

For Marie Holmes, the best thing about the lucky ticket in the $564 million jackpot is that she'll be able to provide for her children, she said at a news conference. All are under the age of 7 -- three daughters and a son with cerebral palsy.

Holmes, 26, said she gave her mom $15 to buy five Quick Pick tickets at a Scotchman convenience store on her way to church.

Holmes and her family live in a single-wide trailer in Shallotte, North Carolina -- a coastal town of about 4,000 people just north of the South Carolina border. She worked at Wal-Mart, McDonald's and other places before recently quitting to stay home with her children.

She didn't watch the Feb. 11 numbers drawing on television and didn't learn she held the winning ticket until the following morning.

The winning numbers were: 11, 13, 25, 39, 54 and the Powerball 19. The odds of hitting the jackpot were 1 in 175 million.

"I started screaming and jumping around," Holmes said. "I said to my kids, `You just don't understand what this means."'

A couple weeks later, life is already different. Security staff now accompanies her everywhere, which she said is taking some getting used to. At the news conference Monday, she was flanked by a lawyer and a financial adviser.

Holmes said she'll take the lump-sum payment option of $127 million, which will total about $88 million after taxes. She said she'll tithe a percentage of the money to her church and charities.

She has no immediate plans for what to do with her life after becoming a multi-millionaire but said she may go back to finish her college degree. Holmes also wants to travel, perhaps to Paris -- she's never been outside the U.S.

"I am humbled and grateful for the opportunities this has created for my family," she said.

Another of the three winners has elected to remain anonymous in Puerto Rico. The third winner, in Texas, hasn't come forward. The Texas Lottery posted on Twitter that one of the winning tickets was sold at Appletree Food Mart in Princeton, a city about 40 miles north of Dallas.

Holmes' win is the fourth time that a North Carolina ticket has claimed a Powerball jackpot. She is also now the largest lottery winner in state history, eclipsing a retired firefighter from Asheville who won $141 million in 2010.

It had been nearly a year since a Powerball prize reached the giant number people have come to expect recently. That was last February, when someone won $425.3 million.

In 2012, state officials who run Powerball and Mega Millions changed ticket prices and lowered the odds of winning jackpots in hopes the moves would increase the number of huge prizes and draw more players. The new rules worked, causing jackpots to repeatedly climb to record levels. More than half of the top 10 U.S. jackpots have been reached in the past couple of years.

The Feb. 11 jackpot was the third-largest in Powerball history and the fifth-largest U.S. lottery prize. The last time a Powerball jackpot climbed so high was May 2013, when a Florida ticket won a $590.5 million prize.
 
I agree the lottery is a money extracting scheme for government, it just irked me to read an article trumpeting the virtues of this particular "winner"...

The sentence about how she intends to tithe a portion to her church yet no mention of the folks who have literally supported her is particularly offensive to me. Were I her Pastor, instead of rubbing my mits together in glee I'd be advising her to settle up before tithing....But that's just me.
 
I agree the lottery is a money extracting scheme for government, it just irked me to read an article trumpeting the virtues of this particular "winner"...

The sentence about how she intends to tithe a portion to her church yet no mention of the folks who have literally supported her is particularly offensive to me. Were I her Pastor, instead of rubbing my mits together in glee I'd be advising her to settle up before tithing....But that's just me.

Yeah, irks me too. But, at least, the state will get 88 million back. Far more than she ever would have payed back had she not won. And I agree that her pastor should offer some advise about what to do with her winnings. Set up trade/educational foundations for those on welfare in her area. Perhaps a day care so the parent(s) could go look for work. Etc.
 
No, it wasn't.

But it wasn't pulled out of your wallet at gunpoint either.

Very true.

I suppose "winning" should count for earning just so long as one doesn't look at the source of the monies wagered..

For some reason this just twists my knickers...


[edit]

I'm betting this fine person is still cashing the checks from child support too...
 
Very true.

I suppose "winning" should count for earning just so long as one doesn't look at the source of the monies wagered..

For some reason this just twists my knickers...

What twists your knickers, and mine, is that the welfare money should have went towards...welfare. Even if it was just a $2 lottery ticket. I don't really consider it any different than those that used their EBT cards at casinos and strip clubs.
 
What twists your knickers, and mine, is that the welfare money should have went towards...welfare. Even if it was just a $2 lottery ticket. I don't really consider it any different than those that used their EBT cards at casinos and strip clubs.

Exactly!

And "child support", in my opinion, should be used for the child not moms groceries/utilities/rent/clothes/dope or gambling.....
 
Very true.

I suppose "winning" should count for earning just so long as one doesn't look at the source of the monies wagered..

For some reason this just twists my knickers...


[edit]

I'm betting this fine person is still cashing the checks from child support too...

No, you're right, it wasn't "earning" by any stretch of the imagination.

There's now a family out of the system, and that's always a good thing, AFAIC.
 
Exactly!

And "child support", in my opinion, should be used for the child not moms groceries/utilities/rent/clothes/dope or gambling.....

Should, and we all know how often it is not.

Poor people, in many cases, are poor because of poor decisions...like spending grocery money on lottery tickets.
 
No, you're right, it wasn't "earning" by any stretch of the imagination.

There's now a family out of the system, and that's always a good thing, AFAIC.

If this family really gets out of the system I'll sing their allocades...

But.................

As long as this "single mom" keeps her children tied to the family court system and keeps cashing checks ordered by that system I'm not able to.
 
Not really an excuse nor justification, but don't you imagine that the taxes on her lottery winnings paid back much more than her accumulated total welfare payments?
 
I suppose , without looking , there is a chance she is still qualified for welfare. As far as I know , that would be based on current income , not what you have in the bank ?
 
Back
Top