HazardPerry
Member
- Joined
- Nov 15, 2007
- Messages
- 407
Didn't this kind of shit happen with Buchanan?
Glad to see HQ putting their foot down.

OK, first NH and the sham recount with slit boxes and ballots being moved from the ballot vault in the middle of the night? Now this, an Uncommited ProLife delegate, this is basically the same ideas they have instituted since the DNC started with their Super Delegate Plan to shut out anyone they don't agree with, then the RNC soon followed......... All the Super Delegates on both sides all go to Romney and Billary. That basically means the Super Delegates can be bought......... This Louisiana Caucus FRAUD should not be allowed....... The Establishment has had since August to plan out State by State how they would keep anyone but the "Elite" out of Power. Caucuses are much easier to manipulate because last minute rule changes are allowed. Primaries, as long as they are Paper Trailed and transparent to the Public, are a better form of Election.
What has happened in Louisiana needs to be prosecuted to the full extent of the Law............... This cannot be allowed. It will take our Republic away from us, and give us more sham elections like the 2000 and 2004 Presidential Elections.
P.S. The guys in Ohio who helped Bush cheat are in Prison as we speak. That is a good sign. We have to keep the pressure on for fair and open elections.......
Peace Out......
(1) I am glad Ron Paul is not connected to the NH recount, because I knew no matter how it turned out the Truthers would not accept the tally.
(2) I think National was right to file a challenge in LA, just to keep the option open, but I doubt it will go any farther.
(3) LA does not appear to have any fraud at all... rules change (The RNC can do that, they could limit voters to people dressed like Pink Elephants if they wanted too.) You adapt and move on.
(4) Crying Wolf Effect: belly whining and crying fraud hurts RP more than any actual vote fraud ever could. We cry fraud every day on here, so much so that NO one will ever believe us if there is real fraud at some junction.
(1) I am glad Ron Paul is not connected to the NH recount, because I knew no matter how it turned out the Truthers would not accept the tally.
(2) I think National was right to file a challenge in LA, just to keep the option open, but I doubt it will go any farther.
(3) LA does not appear to have any fraud at all... rules change (The RNC can do that, they could limit voters to people dressed like Pink Elephants if they wanted too.) You adapt and move on.
nice troll post.
So your answer is bend over and take it? Can we at least get lube this time?
"I didn't like the timing of the Rule Changes in LA"
Here is how I think it should have been done.
(1) I am glad Ron Paul is not connected to the NH recount, because I knew no matter how it turned out the Truthers would not accept the tally.
(2) I think National was right to file a challenge in LA, just to keep the option open, but I doubt it will go any farther.
(3) LA does not appear to have any fraud at all... rules change (The RNC can do that, they could limit voters to people dressed like Pink Elephants if they wanted too.) You adapt and move on.
(4) Crying Wolf Effect: belly whining and crying fraud hurts RP more than any actual vote fraud ever could. We cry fraud every day on here, so much so that NO one will ever believe us if there is real fraud at some junction.
(3) But changing rules in the process is not okay. ANd the state GOP forced many Paul supporters to cast provisional ballots, of which they discarded two-thirds (though most of these voters made the switch to the GOP before the Nov. 30 deadline in tune with state GOP rules).
Take what? There is nothing to take...
You don't like the rule changes? Ok, start a Post..
See the difference? Reasonable? Sane...
And is it fair for people to join the GOP just so they can vote for Dr. Paul? hmmmm, I can see it from both perspectives... take a step back and ask yourself (1) is it fraud, (2) why were the changes made, (3) how does this effect Ron Paul
So in other words you have a neo-con response. "Get in line, your line of thinking is not what I consider sane?"