We need WAY more quality control when it comes to videos of Ron Paul that hit the web.

swatmc

Member
Joined
May 15, 2007
Messages
299
I love you guys. I really do, but the quality of these videos are EMBARRASSING:



AND

http://link.brightcove.com/services/player/bcpid374632111001?bckey=AQ~~,AAAAADEw9EQ~,h1MFhv8o 8KH4Pz94oWeQK6-s80p1y6W8&bctid=1102936938001

Not the content, but the quality. This is not a video of a bigfoot sighting, this is a video of potentially the next president.

There should be ZERO TOLERANCE when it comes to shoddy camerawork of Ron.

Find a tripod, keep a medium shot (with a slight low angle), clean up the audio, and DON'T MOVE.

I just needed to point that out.

Private message me and I will volunteer my time in the New York area if someone needs a cameraman in the future.
 
I'd rather have a poor quality video of Ron Paul than to have his message be Censored.

Sure, we can try to shoot better videos, but it is still better than nothing.
 
Although I am very grateful for the videos uploaded...

We should have a chip-in for professional HD equipment to follow every speech on the campaign trail.
Uploaded to the tubes in HD.
Streamed on Justin, or other sites.

What happened to the live radio broadcasts?

We have the technology!
 
Although I am very grateful for the videos uploaded...

We should have a chip-in for professional HD equipment to follow every speech on the campaign trail.
Uploaded to the tubes in HD.
Streamed on Justin, or other sites.

What happened to the live radio broadcasts?

We have the technology!

I often wondered why someone is not following this campaigns ins and outs with a HD or better video cam. This would make an epic documentary of the rise of the next President.

Rev9
 
Ron Paul should just have a full time videographer with an HD camera and experience to follow his campaign around.

This is a no brainer people.

The entire establishment is against us, the least we can do is have a tripod for a camera!!!
 
Back
Top