Wayne County, Michigan Now UN-CERTIFIES Election, After Board Members Say Were THREATENED!

Please let it be noted that the Count believes in using threats to procure official political outcomes.

Also known as TERRORISM.
 
So... you're concerned about the public putting election officials under duress?

The refused to certify the votes , they certified the votes but then they rescinded.

Has a NEUTRAL IMPARTIAL ADJUDICATOR DECLARED THAT THEY WERE UNDER NO COMPULSION TO DO SO ?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?

ARE COERCION and DURESS recognized in Michigan?
 
The refused to certify the votes , they certified the votes but then they rescinded.

Has a NEUTRAL IMPARTIAL ADJUDICATOR DECLARED THAT THEY WERE UNDER NO COMPULSION TO DO SO ?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?

ARE COERCION and DURESS recognized in Michigan?

Will you be posting your all-caps, exaggerated font size concern in threads advocating putting public pressure on election and other governmental officials?




I mean, besides just this approving response:
clipart-standing-ovation-4.jpg
 
Will you be posting your all-caps, exaggerated font size concern in threads advocating putting public pressure on election and other governmental officials?




I mean, besides just this approving response:

Since it appears that you live in a foxhole, let me bring you up to date

In February 2020 the Deep State , the Fake News Media (SEE BS network and the democrats decided that in order to create a socialist republic they needed to get Rid of Trump by any means necessary

1- they tanked the economy - 30 MILLION Americans lost their jobs and numerous businesses have gone belly up

2- then the mother f u c k e r s blamed Trump and repeated the bs numerous times during their broadcasts - they censor anyone who supports Trump

3- Nevertheless , Trump won by a comfortable LANDSLIDE

4- Trump's Legal Dream Team has revealed numerous cases of blatant election fraud which threatens to cause irreparable harm to our Constitutional Republic

WHEREFORE I will engage in ANY lawful action that I deem necessary to fight our domestic enemies .
 
It's not a contract. It's a government official performing the task for which they were appointed.

Anything that requires a signature is a contract under the current Roman legal system in place. It is a pledge to or the performance of some action or duty, whether current or future. In this case, it's the execution of a duty as agreed by the holder of the position as part of the employment contract as a member of the Board. The only question is who is the other party to the contract (the "Public"? the "Board"?). If it is executed under duress, it can at least be argued that the execution of the contractual duty is invalid. Under the UCC, the rock solid way to ensure that the right to claim duress is to add "rights reserved", "without prejudice", "under duress", relevant state UCC code citation, or similar notation after the signature. I don't know if that step was taken by the members but I doubt it.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top