Wayne County, Michigan Now UN-CERTIFIES Election, After Board Members Say Were THREATENED!

[dannno]

They did certify the results.


There is no such thing as an uncertification of the results.

..

Then we posted about all of the threats and harassment they were receiving. Then we posted that they reversed their certification because they were being intimidated and harassed. Then retarded people on the left all in chorus say "that isn't a thing" (heard this all over from the left), when in fact judges do not hold up certifications or agreements that are made under coercion or duress. What the fuck is wrong with you leftists, and why are your thought processes all retarded in the same way?

 

[Contumacious]

I don't own a television.

And I still don't understand what you're trying to convey, other than that your general worldview is about as complex as a saturday morning cartoon.

Bwahahahahahahahaha.

Continue smoking your medicinal marijuana and sing kumbaya.

.

 

[Contumacious]

They did certify the results.


There is no such thing as an uncertification of the results.

We are fully aware that in LaLaLand coercion and duress are not crimes.


.

 

[TheCount]

Bwahahahahahahahaha.

Continue smoking your medicinal marijuana and sing kumbaya.

.

No marijuana, sadly. But it's pretty hilarious that you'd bring that up because there are plenty of people on "your side" in this very argument who partake in that.


It just goes to show the ridiculousness of the worldview that you have ensconced yourself in. You imagine that there are two sides, and only two sides, and that every person must either be on one side or the other. The result of this sort of thinking is exactly what you've displayed in this thread: anyone who says even one word which is contrary to the required religious beliefs of 'your side' therefore must 100% be a member of the 'other side' and must believe all of the religious beliefs of the 'other side.'

The world that you live in objectively doesn't exist.

 

[Dr.3D]

Why are you guys arguing with a donkey?

 

[Contumacious]

No marijuana, sadly. But it's pretty hilarious that you'd bring that up because there are plenty of people on "your side" in this very argument who partake in that.


It just goes to show the ridiculous of the worldview that you have ensconced yourself in. You imagine that there are two sides, and only two sides, and that every person must either be on one side or the other. The result of this sort of thinking is exactly what you've displayed in this thread: anyone who says even one word which is contrary to the required religious beliefs of 'your side' therefore must 100% be a member of the 'other side' and must believe all of the religious beliefs of the 'other side.'

The world that you live in objectively doesn't exist.

I am 70 years old.

I have found out that the ONLY reason that someone like you would support Biden is because your are looking forward to the socialistic/parasitic policies he embraces.

'nuff said

 

[TheCount]

I am 70 years old.

I have found out that the ONLY reason that someone like you would support Biden is because your are looking forward to the socialistic/parasitic policies he embraces.

'nuff said

I don't support Biden


Again, your worldview is objectively wrong and the world that you live in does not exist

 

[Voluntarist]

Per registered decision, member has been banned for violating community standards as interpreted by TheTexan (respect his authoritah) as authorized by Brian4Liberty Ruling

May God have mercy on his atheist, police-hating, non-voting, anarchist soul.

 

[TheCount]

I think he's agreeing with you that "Uncertification" is not a thing and that the vote in Wayne County is still certified ... but I'm also sensing a lot of frustration with that outcome

With the way he posts, both in this thread and others, it seems like he agrees that what I'm saying is true, but for some reason it makes him very angry that I say it. By saying a thing that he agrees is true, I label myself as his enemy. In order to be his ally, I would need to just... pretend that it either isn't true or simply doesn't exist, I think.

 

[pcosmar]

Detroit is about to become irrelevant again,

 

[James_Madison_Lives]

Site requires login.

OK replaced link, try again. https://www.foxnews.com/politics/mi...-rescind-certify-vote-claim-dems-bullied-them

 

[James_Madison_Lives]

Pretty sure un-certification isn't a thing.

Wrong again.

...have now rescinded their votes to certify.

Law 101. Any contract signed under duress is invalid.

 

[Contumacious]

Wrong again.



Law 101. Any contract signed under duress is invalid.

 

[Dary]

Wrong again.

Law 101. Any contract signed under duress is invalid.

Is signing off on or certifying an election count considered a contract?

 

[Dary]

Donna Brazile?

The question is irrelevant . Any Left wing thug can accuse them of "systemic racism" in order to conceal ELECTORAL FRAUD !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

The question isn't irrelevant. I wasn't assigning it any relevancy to begin with. I was just wondering if you knew her name or not.

A simple "no" would have sufficed.

 

[Contumacious]

Is signing off on or certifying an election count considered a contract?

IRRELEVANT


Duress

Unlawful pressure exerted upon a person to coerce that person to perform any act that he or she ordinarily would not perform.

Duress also encompasses the same harm, threats, or restraint exercised upon the affected individual's spouse, child, or parent.

 

[TheCount]

Wrong again.



Law 101. Any contract signed under duress is invalid.

It's not a contract. It's a government official performing the task for which they were appointed.

 

[Contumacious]

It's not a contract. It's a government official performing the task for which they were appointed.

An action undertaken VOLUNTARILY, not coerced , not under duress or compulsion

 

[Swordsmyth]

We are fully aware that in LaLaLand coercion and duress are not crimes.


.

Crimes that nullify any "votes" they are used to procure.

 

[TheCount]

An action undertaken VOLUNTARILY, not coerced , not under duress or compulsion

So... you're concerned about the public putting election officials under duress?