Water Vapor is 97% of Greenhouse Gases on Earth; Man's CO2 is 1% !!!

I do not need to prove anything to a man who literally argues that 2+2=4 is not a fact.

I write it for honest people who will read this thread. As for you, it is quite obvious what your role is here.

Good luck.

make a prediction. I'm waiting.

admit you can't.
 
not having rain is hot property?

This must qualify as a brilliant question from the guy who claims to be so "up to date" with the place I just mentioned.

Hey buddy, there's this hot new mecca out west. I even hear tell that O'Mallley is going to move his Dodgers out of Brooklyn to be there.


I'm not the idiot who doesn't even know how to spell ACCEPT.

No, you're the finger pointing idiot who consistently uses poor syntax and punctuation, including his apparent unfamiliarity with the purpose of a period.


I never cited the IPCC, so I don't care about their claims.

I thought we agreed IPCC is a political organization full of shit?

You apparently care enough about IPCC and their scientific separation from politics that you made this statement:
"If you want to challenge Al Gore, use politics, if you want to challenge IPCC, bring better scientists. If you want to challenge the 97% consensus conclusion, use evidence."




ANSWER ME, I DARE YOU.

This is a demand coming from a guy who backed down when I asked him to predict the rain this weekend. The same guy who's going to bring along his global warming college textbook when he begins to shop for his first house.





make a prediction.

Make one yourself.

I'm waiting.
So am I.
 
Last edited:
make a prediction. I'm waiting.

admit you can't.
Stand on your head. I'm waiting. This is just as relevant as you asking me to make a prediction about an event that has ALREADY happened. I do not make predictions about facts that are already firmly in the past. Water is already 97% of all greenhouse gases, and human CO2 is already less than 1%. I do not need to predict this because it has ALREADY come to pass. I do not need to predict what has already happened! Are you so dumb as not being able to understand that?

Stand on your head and clap your hands. I'm waiting. And also jump up and down while you are at it. I dare you. Admit you can't. If you can't do it, your argument is wrong.

See this is about as relevent as you requiring me to "predict" what has ALREADY happened. I think you are actually dumb, and learned how to make money doing it, troll.
 
Last edited:
This is a demand coming from a guy who backed down when I asked him to predict the rain this weekend.

Yeah, because weather is different from climate. So, got an answer?

The same guy who's going to bring along his global warming college textbook when he begins to shop for his first house.

What textbook do you bring?


Make one yourself.


So am I.

I'm with most global warming scientists on their predictions, the globe will continue to warm, there will be greater frequencies of droughts and floods, sea level will rise more than lower. I'm willing to be wrong too. (If I've misunderstood any of their claims, do correct me)

Your turn.
 
Stand on your head. I'm waiting. This is just as relevant as you asking me to make a prediction about an event that has ALREADY happened. I do not make predictions about facts that are already firmly in the past. Water is already 97% of all greenhouse gases, and human CO2 is already less than 1%. I do not need to predict this because it has ALREADY come to pass. I do not need to predict what has already happened! Are you so dumb as not being able to understand that?

You can't make a prediction, so keep making excuses.

I can predict you'll drink water in the next 480 hours or you'll die.

Make your climate prediction, try 5 years, 10 years. Go ahead, you seem to know what you're talking about.

Stand on your head and clap your hands. I'm waiting. And also jump up and down while you are at it. I dare you. Admit you can't.

I never claimed you can't. I didn't say I could stand on my head and clap my hands. So sure, I'll admit I can't. Your turn.
 
I do not need to predict what has already happened! Are you so dumb as not being able to understand that?

Nobody asked you about what already happened. I'm asking you if you can use your confidence in greenhouse gases and sun activity to predict future climate and temperatures.

Obviously alarmists are wrong, so you must know what and who is right. Go ahead, prove them wrong, or STFU about calling people liars.
 
Nobody asked you about what already happened. I'm asking you if you can use your confidence in greenhouse gases and sun activity to predict future climate and temperatures.

Obviously alarmists are wrong, so you must know what and who is right. Go ahead, prove them wrong, or STFU about calling people liars.
I do not need to predict weather to prove that their analysis is wrong. Even if the planet experiences catastrophic warming it will NOT be because of human produced CO2. That is my prediction. It will be because of the Sun.
 
Last edited:
I do not need to predict wather to prove that their analysis is wrong. Even if the planet experiences catastrophic warming it will NOT be because of human produced CO2. That is my prediction. It will be because of the Sun.

Ok, now we're getting somewhere, are you open to the possibility, or readily accept there to be catastrophic warming, regardless of what caused it?
 
Answer to what?

For what?

Do you dispute the popularly accepted global warming claims? If not, cool. My question was originally to anybody who claims they are wrong, or even intentionally lying.

Furthermore, those who claim they have better explanations for climate, and thus I ask if they are willing to make any predictions to test using their beliefs.

I gave you my prediction, or the prediction I accept. If you don't dispute or disagree, we have nothing to discuss here, but if you do, I'd love to hear if you have a better one you'd be willing to put to the test.
 
How so? Isn't it popularly accepted that one will die if one does not drink water for approximately three days?

more like scientifically proven. and I said 480 hours, which is 20 days. longer than 2 weeks and far longer than 3 days.

[Edit: what I meant to say was that it's scientifically proven nobody can go 20 days without consuming any source of water. Most people die much sooner, depending on your body mass, weather, activity, there are exceptions, but on a long enough timeline, you will die. I can say 40 days, or 1 year, and you'd have to admit there's a limit science has proven, even if i've gotten the exact number of days wrong]
 
Last edited:
I do not need to predict weather to prove that their analysis is wrong. Even if the planet experiences catastrophic warming it will NOT be because of human produced CO2. That is my prediction. It will be because of the Sun.

So the sun is the only thing which can effect weather on Earth. Interesting. After Mt St Helens erupted, the world was cooler for a while due to all of the dust and ash it spewed high into the atmosphere. http://www.pbs.org/saf/1505/features/climatevolcano.htm Manufacturing also spews dirt into the air. The sun is pretty steady but what is between the ground and the sun changes- whether that is clouds or pollution. That effects our temperatures. It can also trap heat rather than blocking it. Energy which reaches the planet can be reflected back into space but under some conditions, the heat gets trapped below gasses and cannot escape and temperatures build up. Snow for example will reflect light and heat away. If there is no snow, then darker earth can absorb the heat and retain it more. We do get heat from the sun but what happens on Earth has an impact on how hot or how cold we get by changing how much reaches the surface and how much is reflected back off again. The sun is the source, yes, but it is not the major factor behind changes in our weather.
 
Back
Top