Wash Times Poll - Rand is dominating

[PursuePeace]

http://www.washingtontimes.com/polls/2015/dec/15/who-won-5th-republican-presidential-debate/

Rand is at 59%

 

[Virgil]

Voted.

 

[nobody's_hero]

A comment that provides proof that Rand would be closest to getting the center-left vote, and why he leads Hillary in some areas of the country:

"Hillary won. The candidates looked ridiculous. The format is unfair to them. Fortunately, not many people watch the whole thing. Rand Paul is the only one that is interesting to listen to. Christie was ok, but I got tired of hearing how he was a district attorney. Bush should quit, along with Kasich."

 

[William Tell]

Interesting maths.

• Donald Trump
• Ben Carson
• Ted Cruz
• Marco Rubio
• Jeb Bush
• Carly Fiorina
• Chris Christie
• Rand Paul
• John Kasich

• 3012 (48%)​
• 114 (1%)​
• 1047 (16%)​
• 577 (9%)​
• 219 (3%)​
• 132 (2%)​
• 205 (3%)​
• 3657 (59%)​
• 98 (1%)​

[h=2]Comments[/h]

 

[LifeLibertyPursuit]

Boom! Voted! Rand is still at 58-59%

 

[LifeLibertyPursuit]

Oh yeah, insert It's Happening gif

 

[tommyrp12]

Voted. Winning with 58%.

 

[ds21089]

Oh yeah, insert It's Happening gif

 

[Michael Landon]

Voted.

- ML

 

[PCKY]

Voted

 

[The Northbreather]

Done. %56

 

[ARealConservative]

the results add up to more then 100%, seems legit.

/sarcasm

 

[nobody's_hero]

the results add up to more then 100%, seems legit.

/sarcasm

Haha good catch. Yeah WTF Washington Times??

 

[Jonderdonk]

Voted!

 

[Mad Raven]

the results add up to more then 100%, seems legit.

/sarcasm

It makes you wonder how many % they told the programmer to add to someone's score, but the only ones with possibly 33% extra are Trump and Rand, so that doesn't make sense.

 

[Rad]

Perhaps it would be better to not make it obvious.

 

[satchelmcqueen]

done

 

[rprprs]

Ooops... just got around to this one. Rand at 53%

 

[presence]

• 4399 (44%)​
• 159 (1%)​
• 1647 (16%)​
• 847 (8%)​
• 305 (3%)​
• 184 (1%)​
• 306 (3%)​
• 5347 (53%)​
• 144 (1%)
  ​