The national Archives has a Congressional Record that implements the law.
I called and asked. They said they get about 5000 or so calls a year asking for it. A few people scream "No you don't" after, but they've got it.
But what they have is a deception. It's like the law itself. Title 26 appears to give them the authority to collect these taxes, but it's a convoluted mess. And that unnecessary complexity exists for a reason, because they use shifting definitions within the code from page to page to hide the truth.
If you use the Freedom of Information Act to decode your IRS Individual Master file, you will find that you are (surprisingly) a resident of the Virgin Islands, even if you have never even been to the Virgin Islands. That is part of the deception.
As I posted earlier: "All RIGHTS come from our Creator: the United States Government can only exercise powers given to it by We The People through the U.S. Constitution; the "income tax" is an INDIRECT TAX; there is NO section of positive law in the Internal Revenue Code (Title 26 U.S.C.) making a American CITIZEN or a RESIDENT working and living WITHIN A STATE OF THE *UNION, LIABLE to pay the INCOME (indirect/excise/duty) TAX who is not engaged in the functions of a public office."
Consider the following:
From the Handbook for Special Agents, page 9781-51, 334.112
The Individual Master File Section:
"(1) The Individual Master File is a magnetic tape record of all individual income tax filers in Social Security Number sequence, and is maintained at the National Computer Center.
The Individual Master File is designed to accumulate in each taxpayer's account all data pertaining to the income taxes for which the taxpayer is liable. (Gets tricky when you start chasing down the definitions for exactly who is a "taxpayer" and who is "liable" for what)
The taxpayer information stored in the master computer for each IMF
may be understood only by a careful and tedious process of decoding by references to the explanations contained in the IRS 6209 Manual, IMF Operations Manual, Law Enforcement Manual, and several other manuals published by the Service for the instruction and guidance of its personnel."
This creates a prime facie case against you in court, because the IRS takes these Individual Master Files in against you.
Prime facie cases must be
REBUTTED.
The IMF files are a "Rebuttable Presumption" in the law of evidence.
If you do not rebut them, they are said to have "Presumptive Correctness" in any court action against you.
Why is this important? Because the courts have already ruled on the matter:
"Government prevails in challenge to individual’s appeals hearing in which master file transcripts were considered at hearing instead of tax returns." - Stanifird v. Wilcox et al. 87 AFTR2d Par. 2001-1058 June 12, 2001.
Decode your IMF and you will find the truth. Listen to the truth that leaks out from a former chief of the IRS's Freedom of Information Act branch:
"The overwhelming majority of taxpayers appear to be perfectly willing to face serious adverse action without bothering to make any significant effort to learn what the agency knows about them or how they came to be in that situation. In fact, even subjects of major criminal investigation seldom bother to make such inquiries, apparently being willing to face trial and risk imprisonment without
writing a simple letter which could produce information which could literally save their freedom.”
- Marcus Farbenblum, Chief of the Freedom of Information Branch, IRS National Office, from his book, “The I.R.S. and the Freedom of Information and Privacy Act of 1974,” regarding FOIA requests
Now if someone doesn't pay their taxes and is charged with a crime, why is this IRS chief at the FOIA office telling people they "could literally save their freedom" by writing a simple letter requesting information from a Freedom of Information Act?
Think about it, folks. The only possible explanation is that something is indeed hidden in their Individual Master File which would prove they don't owe the tax.
