Was Huck used as a pawn against Ron Paul?

HollyforRP

Member
Joined
Jan 17, 2008
Messages
525
I think Huck was used as a pawn to deliberatly take Ron Paul's ideas, pass them off as his own to make Ron Paul seem less unique and individual for further discrediting of Ron Paul and his talks about the constitution.

Does anyone have proof that Huck has never subscribed to what he talks about now?

Now that it's down to four candidates, Huck is getting the Ron Paul treatment. I wonder what this is all about.

So can anyone post Huckabee's positions prior to running for president because I feel he's trying to copy Ron Paul's stances a little too much and I think he was just used as a pawn but I don't know this for a fact.

Anyone?
 
Or perhaps he was used so that people wouldn't say ron was the only one excluded.
 
I think Huck was used as a pawn to deliberatly take Ron Paul's ideas, pass them off as his own to make Ron Paul seem less unique and individual for further discrediting of Ron Paul and his talks about the constitution.

Does anyone have proof that Huck has never subscribed to what he talks about now?

Now that it's down to four candidates, Huck is getting the Ron Paul treatment. I wonder what this is all about.

So can anyone post Huckabee's positions prior to running for president because I feel he's trying to copy Ron Paul's stances a little too much and I think he was just used as a pawn but I don't know this for a fact.

Anyone?


YES!!!

I said this earlier in another thread. It's exactly what he was USED for. So transparent.
 
Huck sucked ass at the debate didnt you see everyone laughing at him when was talking about building roads to stimulate the economy?

Haha

I was hoping Ron Paul would jump in say so Huck you plan on building roads all over America to solve the problem of inflation? hmm ok.


Seriously Huck looked like a big loser sure he had some zingers But whne hes running on the same policy as Mccain and Romney he just looks like 3rd tier.


Its all about contrast people!! Ron Paul is the only one with different ideas and about real change.
 
no he was used by the old media and the establishment to hold a carrot over the stick for social conservatives.

look for him to be a VP for whoever so they can give the impression the new pres will fight against abortion, while quietly being a pro-choice candidate.

they know that if the wrong guy is elected the social conservative vote is gone.

though, if that happened it would be cool to see buchanan/paul run together on a merger of several 3rd parties, thats a potential winner as a true republican party of old.
 
Huck sucked ass at the debate didnt you see everyone laughing at him when was talking about building roads to stimulate the economy?

Haha

I was hoping Ron Paul would jump in say so Huck you plan on building roads all over America to solve the problem of inflation? hmm ok.


Seriously Huck looked like a big loser sure he had some zingers But whne hes running on the same policy as Mccain and Romney he just looks like 3rd tier.


Its all about contrast people!! Ron Paul is the only one with different ideas and about real change.

Actually...

If the monetary policy is sound with the government issuing the money, building roads is the way you stimulate the economy... The government prints the money and then spends it to build something durable. So instead of having Nothing to show for the printed money you have something that will stimulate trade, such as a road or bridge or even a school. The people that get first use of the money are the people who built the bridge/road/school.

See.. National interstate highway system and the Hoover Dam..

The problem is that we don't have a sound monetary system and the government will have to borrow the money from the Federal Reserve.

Keith
 
Huckabee has learned more about presidential ideals listening to Ron Paul during debates than at any other time in his life. At least he can agree with them, unlike the war monger and the poser.
 
i don't agree with you on public roads. I don't personally agree with public roads at all. i think if you got rid of the fourteenth ammendment rulings that allow corporations to exist as for profit, people with the same rights as an individual, the monopoly of corporations would die off. once the corporate monopolies died off, you could allow privatization of the roads(by private landowners), which would allow for true stimulation of the economy.

something we haven't thought about, all this talk of energy independance, etc, is moot, bc of government involvement in transportation, there has been an overemphasis on wheeled motorized transit. we could've shifted to aerial vehicles(much more practical mode of transit, space-wise) by now for all we know if the government wasn't fiddling with the market.
 
Last edited:
In a post-debate discussion on FOX, Huck said his goal was to take as many supporters away from RP as possible.
 
Actually...

If the monetary policy is sound with the government issuing the money, building roads is the way you stimulate the economy... The government prints the money and then spends it to build something durable. So instead of having Nothing to show for the printed money you have something that will stimulate trade, such as a road or bridge or even a school. The people that get first use of the money are the people who built the bridge/road/school.

See.. National interstate highway system and the Hoover Dam..

The problem is that we don't have a sound monetary system and the government will have to borrow the money from the Federal Reserve.

Keith

You build roads when you need them you just dont start building roads clear across america. Its the states job to build roads within their state if they need them.


Its not the federal governments job to come into your state and say You put a road here and there. BRIDGE TO NOWHERE. If the economy requires it in your state get your governor on the phone.

I could see if this was 1900 and we needed roads from new york to cali. But we have plenty of roads many go unmanaged now.
 
Youtube or it didn't happen.

He said it on Hannity and Colmes. You know how they interview each candidate after a debate. It wasn't as dramatic as my post might have made it sound. But he comes out and targets RP saying he wants to take those votes. I'm sure its on Youtube somewhere. Its not worth digging it up though. It was obvious for months Huck was there to take Rons talking points. He was placed next to Ron in almost every debate for shared camera time. One rarely got a question during a debate without the other being asked immediately after. The purpose was always to minimize Ron's message with a "competing" voice.
 
I think he arrogantly believes in his lies.

I've noticed Huck supporters trying to do the whole "you should respect Huck" in order to get us to go to his base. Why the hell do we want a prsident that can't even come up with his own platform?

He's there for a diversion. We need to expose this because I don't recall Huckabee even speaking about the constitution or money borrowed from China before his debate with Ron Paul.

It's as if the fake preacher met someone with a good mind and soul and decided to mirror that person because he himself should be more like that person.
 
Back
Top