WAPO: Vulgar video of Trump Recorded in 2005

[Peace&Freedom]

So who are these people you are referring to? Any examples? I want to be amused too.

As I said, this thread is example enough. Are you denying Trump bashing posters have said for months (despite all evidence) that "Trump is not an outsider?" Please.

Which is it? neither, your argument is a false choice.

think of the RNC cutting off their leg because its gangrene. This is purely self preservation at this point. You have to look at it from the opposite perspective, what if Clinton was on tape saying ******? How do you think the Democrat establishment would act?? Do you think they would disavow Clinton?? Do you think that would make Clinton any less establishment??

Hillary already HAS been caught lying, and defaming legions of voters (as deplorables, super predators, basement dwellers, or most recently her own supporters as "a bucket of losers") again and again. The Democratic establishment has nonetheless stuck to her like glue, gangrene and all, BECAUSE SHE IS ESTABLISHMENT. The GOP doesn't do so for Trump, because he's not, or is no longer establishment. So the point stands.

 

[familydog]

Figures a Trumptard wouldn't want women treated with respect. You are a creepy scumbag.

Lol. When have I ever professed my support for Trump?

For someone who becomes so wilted due to fowl language, you sure like to name call.

 

[The Rebel Poet]

Lol. When have I ever professed my support for Trump?

For someone who becomes so wilted due to fowl language, you sure like to name call.

Who said anything about language?

 

[Origanalist]

As I said, this thread is example enough. Are you denying Trump bashing posters have said for months (despite all evidence) that "Trump is not an outsider?"

It's not about feelings, it's the truth. I am amused by those here going from saying one week that the "whole establishment is secretly backing Trump," to thanking the whole establishment for attacking or abandoning Trump the following week, and back again. Or those saying the race should focus on current issues, then prudishly brooding about private comments Trump made years ago, over and over. So which is it?

You're kind of bouncing around here aren't you?

 

[familydog]

Who said anything about language?

Figures a Trumptard wouldn't want women treated with respect.

It's early in the day, so I can understand how you could miss the entire point of this thread.

 

[The Rebel Poet]

It's early in the day, so I can understand how you could miss the entire point of this thread.

It's not early where I am, but I'm not sure how you missed it. It's not about "fuck" or "pussy," those are just words, and words are not scary to me or probably anyone on this forum. It's about his actions and attitudes.

 

[Peace&Freedom]

You're kind of bouncing around here aren't you?

More like I am simply pointing out that the establishment GOP "leaders" who have done a sudden well-orchestrated retraction of their "support" for Trump in one weekend, patently contradicts the premise that Trump was one of them. You are bouncing away from that point.

 

[familydog]

It's not early where I am, but I'm not sure how you missed it. It's not about "$#@!" or "pussy," those are just words, and words are not scary to me or probably anyone on this forum. It's about his actions and attitudes.

Bill Clinton rapes women and his wife, the MSM and the entire left-wing covers for him and destroys his victims.

Trump makes distasteful statements about women that one can find in a romance novel in a supermarket. And this is where you draw the line?

If you haven't realized Trump is a wealthy alpha male, you have not been paying attention.

 

[Danke]

 

[Danke]

 

[Origanalist]

More like I am simply pointing out that the establishment GOP "leaders" who have done a sudden well-orchestrated retraction of their "support" for Trump in one weekend, patently contradicts the premise that Trump was one of them. You are bouncing away from that point.

No, I'm not. They never liked him and I never said they did.

Once again...your statement;

It's not about feelings, it's the truth. I am amused by those here going from saying one week that the "whole establishment is secretly backing Trump," to thanking the whole establishment for attacking or abandoning Trump the following week, and back again. Or those saying the race should focus on current issues, then prudishly brooding about private comments Trump made years ago, over and over. So which is it?

I merely asked for an example of someone doing this. In particular the first sentence.

 

[Jamesiv1]

Actions speak louder than words.

Watch my feet, not my mouth.

 

[specsaregood]

I merely asked for an example of someone doing this. In particular the first sentence.

It does seem like that should be easy enough to provide if true.

 

[AZJoe]

WAPO Publishes Reaction by GOP mega-donors: https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...ors-robert-and-rebekah-mercer-stand-by-trump/

GOP mega-donors Robert and Rebekah Mercer, two of the most influential figures in Trump's orbit, said …

“If Mr. Trump had told Billy Bush, whoever that is, earlier this year that he was for open borders, open trade, and executive actions in pursuit of gun control, we would certainly be rethinking our support for him. If he had admitted to Mr. Bush that he had profited privately by allowing the sale to Russia of 20% of US uranium deposits or that he had amassed his personal fortune not by hard work in the private sector but by selling favors to foreigners on the American taxpayers' dime, we would certainly be rethinking our support for him. If he had argued that he needed both a public and a private position on issues facing the American public, we would certainly be rethinking our support for him. And finally if Trump had serially terrorized and silenced the victims of violent sexual assault whom he feared could damage his political career, we would most definitely be rethinking our support for him.​

“Donald Trump's uncensored comments, both old and new, have been echoed and dissected in the media repeatedly … We are completely indifferent to Mr. Trump's locker room braggadocio.

“The same media that resolutely looked away when the most powerful man in the world, a sitting U.S. president with multiple violent sexual assaults to his credit, snared an impressionable young intern in his web and ruined her life, now expects us to gasp with revulsion at Mr. Trump's irreverent comments. …​

 

[enhanced_deficit]

Actions speak louder than words.

Watch my feet, not my mouth.

But whatever you do, don't read her private speeches or private positions. Just stay with the public positions of mass deception.

All the folks who fell for this hot mic distraction ploy were played by media-HRC collusion synergy team to distract attention from these leaks.



BREAKING: Clinton Campaign Thinks African Americans are Losers

Hillary Clintons political career done for good.

In an effort to keep those speeches private, strongly worded contracts prohibited unauthorized recordings, reporters were banned and, in some cases, blog posts about her remarks pulled off websites. Throughout her campaign, she has staunchly refused to release transcripts, resisting pressure from primary rival Bernie Sanders and the media to do so.

The WikiLeaks disclosures should be the kind of “October surprise” that would thrill Clinton’s opponents, who’ve spent years attacking her as untrustworthy and willing to say anything for personal gain.

http://www.pbs.org/newshour/rundown/...treet-private/

 

[Jamesiv1]

But whatever you do, don't read her private speeches or private positions. Just stay with the public positions of mass deception.

All the folks who fell for this hot mic distraction ploy were played by media-HRC collusion synergy team to distract attention from these leaks.



BREAKING: Clinton Campaign Thinks African Americans are Losers

Hillary Clintons political career done for good.

In an effort to keep those speeches private, strongly worded contracts prohibited unauthorized recordings, reporters were banned and, in some cases, blog posts about her remarks pulled off websites. Throughout her campaign, she has staunchly refused to release transcripts, resisting pressure from primary rival Bernie Sanders and the media to do so.

The WikiLeaks disclosures should be the kind of “October surprise” that would thrill Clinton’s opponents, who’ve spent years attacking her as untrustworthy and willing to say anything for personal gain.

http://www.pbs.org/newshour/rundown/...treet-private/

I hope Trump shows up ready to play hardball tonight. I think he and his campaign woefully underestimated how low the Clinton camp would go.

He needs to slam-dunk this one.

 

[Peace&Freedom]

No, I'm not. They never liked him and I never said they did.

Once again...your statement;

I merely asked for an example of someone doing this. In particular the first sentence.

I'm merely still not buying it was a sincere question. In particular because of months of threads where the bashers objected to any suggestion that Trump was an anti-establishment candidate. Do your own research, it's all there.

 

[Peace&Freedom]

More evidence of the orchestration. Paul Ryan and Rence Priebus knew about the tape WEEKS AGO:

House Speaker Paul Ryan and GOP Chairman Rence Priebus aware that the Billy Bush audio tape was coming weeks ago!!
Submitted by IWB, on October 9th, 2016

...I’m still reporting on the unholy alliance between RINOs like Paul Ryan and the Clinton campaign.

Today, Republican elected officials and party elders denounced Donald Trump’s “open mic” recording concerning lewd comments made about women in 2005 on the set of a soap opera.

Some sitting members in Congress withdrew their support from Trump entirely, while others criticized the remarks, but stuck with Trump – their standard-bearer.

Some even suggested that Trump step aside so that his running mate, Indiana Gov. Mike Pence could lead the ticket.

But then, at mid-morning, DC Whispers put up a story that Clinton operatives, working with the Washington Post made both House Speaker Paul Ryan and GOP Chairman Rence Priebus aware that the Billy Bush audio tape was coming weeks ago, but they failed to notify the Trump campaign, making them complicit with Team Clinton in maximizing harm to Trump’s chances...

http://investmentwatchblog.com/hous...e-billy-bush-audio-tape-was-coming-weeks-ago/

 

[silverhandorder]

All these Clinton leaks actually show that she shares a lot of positions with us and they are playing the "lie to everyone to get to power gig".

She is open immigration, open trade and thinks there are loser parts of the population. I think many people on this board think precisely in these terms.

However it's stunning how incompetent and corrupt she is. The only thing she has going for her is inertia. All the shit she is doing is taking a very long time to catch up to her. Also she has the parasite vote locked up with her promises of bread and circuses.

This shit is so simple it boggles my mind.

 

[Origanalist]

I'm merely still not buying it was a sincere question. In particular because of months of threads where the bashers objected to any suggestion that Trump was an anti-establishment candidate. Do your own research, it's all there.

Now you sound like rev3. Don't like the question? The person asking must not be serious.