I am amazed that so few people on a Ron Paul forum understand Constitutional law or real capitalism
I quite like Ron Paul even if I disagree with him on a small number of issues. The constitution is meaningless several supreme court cases as well as other things have proven this.
"But, indeed, no private person has a right to complain, by suit in court, on the ground of a breach of the Constitution. The Constitution, it is true, is a compact, but he is not a party to it." from Padelford, Fay & Co. vs. The Mayor and Aldermen of the City of Savannah. 14 Georgia 438, 520 "Just A Goddamned Piece Of Paper" - George Bush
famguardian.org/Subjects/LawAndGovt/Articles/SenateReport93-549.htm
Real capitalism is NOT corporatism or mercantilism- this is what we primarily experience today and was the real reason for the Revolutionary War.
What does this have to with anything? No one advocates the system we have today. Actually the revolutionary war was caused by the colonies being forced to give up colonial scrip and being forced onto a gold standard.
Real capitalism is product driven: you make a product- if people like it you keep on making it. The price goes down and salaries go up. If I make a bad product, nobody buys and I'd better start another kind of business. I am not bailed out and people aren't forced to join an organization in order to work.
I wish people would stop throwing around the words capitalism or socialism and being as both word have lost their meaning. I prefer the term free market. Capitalism is marxist term and libertarians will sound marxist when they throw that around "it is not real capitalism man" vs " the soviet union was not real communism". I oppose bail outs how ever no one is forced to join a union you can work for someone else.
Right to work states promote everyone's right to a job without having to pay dues or join unwanted organizations. This is called FREEDOM.
No it is not this is the government intervening in the market restricting the right of contract. That is called government intervention.
If I am forced to join a union and have dues taken out of my paycheck without my consent, how is that any different than the British making the colonists buy only one brand of tea and at their price? How is it any different than the British taxing the Scots against their will?