sailingaway
Member
- Joined
- Mar 7, 2010
- Messages
- 72,103
The greater good of the electoral process far exceeds the value of any one mans job. If his job loss amounts to a change in the approach of the coming caucuses and primaries, then so be it.
Webster has said that the state party committee will discuss the caucus process at the March 10 meeting, but he doesn’t believe that including all state votes will change the outcome. He also has said that he will not release updated numbers until that March meeting.
“What I tell people is: I’m not going to fire or discipline my staff for clerical errors,” Webster said Wednesday, acknowledging that mistakes were made.
the point is that primaries are LESS transparent and MORE manipulatable so it would be a step BACKWARDS for process.
Webster said he has been around long enough to weather criticism and calls for his resignation.
“If people were saying ‘he can’t raise money, he can’t raise candidates or he doesn’t speak for the party,’ then I’d consider it,” he said. “That’s not the case here.”
The state Republican party chairmen in Iowa and Nevada both stepped down in the wake of similar controversies in their states earlier this year. Iowa initially awarded its caucus win to Romney only to discover about two weeks later that former Pennsylvania Sen. Rick Santorum actually had won. Nevada’s caucuses, won handily by Romney, were plagued by allegations of voter fraud.
+rep for truththe point is that primaries are LESS transparent and MORE manipulatable so it would be a step BACKWARDS for process.