Wait, Romney made fun of paul physically off camera...??!!!

[N13]

It was McCain making faces, shown on split screen.


Regis that is my final answer.

 

[braumstr]

I saw McCain doing that. He is really out there. I have a buddy who supports him and I cant figure out how he does not see what a lunatic the guy has become.

I think McCain wants to be president so bad it has driven him mad.

 

[sean43]

Anyone who went, can you please tell us!

 

[Thomas Paine]

I saw McCain doing that. He is really out there. I have a buddy who supports him and I cant figure out how he does not see what a lunatic the guy has become.

I think McCain wants to be president so bad it has driven him mad.

Keep it up, McCain. You are never going to win the general election even if the GOP is dumb enough to select you as its presidential nominee. You will go the way of Walter Mondale -- into the ash heap of political history. What a prick!

 

[mikeh2002]

What pissed me off about that whole incident is Hume's assertion that RP hadn't answered the question.
His question was..."If it happens again?"
RP's answer: "I would certainly urge caution."

His question was answered in one line, he just didn't like the fact that he was calling the other boobs for their paranoid policies. Well, I would have to add that he was just trying to make RP look bad, as we all know is the FOX agenda.
As I was surfing channels this morning I was a headline of Faux news: Blockade Iran? And I thought "great the drums of war are beating louder now."

 

[Swmorgan77]

Dr. Paul's response to the question was correct, even though the other candidates had basically agreed that the commanders did the right thing. RP brought up deception and the current administration (and neo-con) desire for war with Iran. He was speaking in terms of the policy (as he said) and the general atmosphere of looking for an excuse. The others on the stage had already indicated their dislike for Iran and have indicated a desire for 'war' with Iran.

Brit Hume's follow up was inappropriate because he wasn't listening to RP. He was trying to be a 'moralizing' force in the debate, inflating his importance and taking on a role that he and no network should have. His role (and the other network hosts) was badly done.

Romney's snide remark was inappropriate and in bad taste. Ron should have been given opportunity (and should have demanded it) to follow-up in order to deal with the lack of respectful behavior on the part of the other candidates, and specifically Romney in this case.

dp

Ron Paul chose to not address the NON-ISSUE of whether the commander did the right thing by not launching a wider war, and instead chose to address the Iran situation in general.

 

[Carole]

I disagree about the mocking comment. It goes on every debate with snickers, semi-rolling of eyeballs, and McCain with his cheshire cat smile. How could anyone miss it.

Even the audience is rude and laughs at certain candidates.

There has been a lot of rudeness.

As for the moderators/questioners, they tend to inject themselves and become part of the debate at times, such that at one point in this debate Dr. Paul was debating both the others and the moderator.

 

[Carole]

No, the "if it happens again.." was the question Hume asked Paul and he then repeated it for Romney when it was his turn. Nothing ominous there.

 

[Carole]

I found this video. It was quite interesting and explains much about why there is this "rush" to wish togo to was with Iran and why we went back to Iraq.

It is the video just beneath the meetup group map.

The Energy Non-Crisis
(We are ALL in serious trouble!)
http://www.ronpaulmarch.com/