VOTER FRAUD confirmed by voter in Sutton...

[alaric]

read this!

ok sportsfans, i did a little research on the cnn site:
http://www.cnn.com/ELECTION/2008/primaries/results/county/#val=NHREP24
that is page 24 (last page) of a county by county breakdown of the NH results. Lookie what i found: we have 96% districts reporting, but that 4% is made up of 12 counties with ZERO PERCENTAGE REPORTING! this was as of 9:13 am. go verify it. benton, dalton, dunmar, franconia, greenfield, groton, lisbon, meridith, middleton, new ipswich, temple and windsor have not reported any votes! now 4% is more than the 1% diff from Paul vs julie annie. This may not be over! also, which county was the cigar poll in (that Paul won)?

 

[maeqFREEDOMfree]

Maybe her parents lied to her about who they voted for. ;-)

abd then she lied to us about who she voted for? possible but not probable

 

[alaric]

and lets remember to listen to this song by carl klang it really does raise your spirit!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3FiYGMnpe0w

 

[All Seeing Eye]

http://www.watchthevote2008.com/

Just in case you are unaware of this....they have affidavits too.

 

[joenaab]

this is an excellent ten minute video demonstrating how easy the deibold machines are to corrupt. the machine used in this video, including the software, is the same one used in New Hampshire yesterday to count 81% of the votes.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PiiaBqwqkXs

 

[jkm1864]

Look at the boston Globe the top " Map " is what the MSM is reporting guys.. The list on the bottom is AP released numbers. Look closely looks like giuliani, Huckabee, & hunter keep their votes. On the other hand Mccain takes Ron Paul votes, Romney takes tancredo, & thomson takes other...

Now whats important remember the posts earlier about Dixieville + Notch vote now look at the results here. Also look at the sutton votes and compare the two ... I think its imperative for the campaign HQ to get to those two towns and look for people that voted RP......


The excel file is from the map !!

http://www.boston.com/news/politics/...sults_by_town/

http://img260.imageshack.us/my.php?image=resultseq4.png

 

[kimosabi]

Everyone Needs To Video Themselve's Voting​

If We Had 3 Video's Of Ron Paul People Voting For Ron Paul In Sutton And They Didn't Get Counted, We Have Verifyable Vote Fraud!!!​

 

[frasu]

Bump...

 

[marcus3x]

Sutton with 100% reporting reported 0 votes for paul but poster in Sutton posted:


http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthread.php?p=885166#post885166

If we can contact NH meetups to look into this!

HAVE THE NAMES OF THE PEOPLE CLAIMING TO VOTE FOR RON PAUL COME OUT?

 

[JayDee]

I want to point out another suspicious aspect of this post that appears here frequently from the same type of poster.

First off, it is the employment of shame-based emotional abuse, which is one of the most common techniques used by pschopaths (remember, the world is under attack by Global Psychopathy, read "Political Ponerology", "Without Conscience: The Disturbing World of the Psychopaths Among Us", and "Snakes in Suits: When Psychopaths Go to Work" to bring yourself up to speed).

You see the shame attack in "You all look silly with this voter fraud whining. You look like KoolAid drinkers." Setting aside that I have no idea what the KoolAid drinker insult is supposed to mean. This is clearly a shame attack. You see it again in the attack phrase "rumor mongering". Note that they don't always have to be coached to employ this technique. It happens to be one of the natural "gifts" of the psychopath.

Next up, the concluding remark of "Keep it buttoned unless you can find lots of SOLID proof". Regardless of where you stand on 9/11, this is one of the main attack points used against 9/11 activism. It is entirely irrational in it's foundation on two grounds. First, as with 9/11 and the OP in this thread, there is solid and credible proof to warrant investigation. Second, it is irrational to demand proof while calling for the cessation of investigation and working hard to obstruct authentic investigation.

In the OP, we have first hand testimony of about as solid proof as you can get, - a precinct reporting zero votes for Ron Paul and several voters providing initial testimony that they voted for him.

Again, watch out for these people. This guy is obvious, but the others can be more clever and some of them are trusted here. Look for the tell-tale signs:

1. Calls to cease investigation into election fraud.
2. "Shame on you [fill in insults] for bringing it up in the first place".
3. Mainstream Media, Mainstream Polls, Mainstream Everything can be trusted implicitly.
4. Blame each other. Divide yourselves and then attack each other.
5. The results are acceptable, let's move on and put this behind us.

Stay awake. This is much bigger than the Ron Paul campaign. Pschopaths assemble and seize control whenever the people go to sleep, and it is the Psychopath who has mastered the art of putting the people to sleep. They produce very little of value because they are parasitic in nature. The principal contribution to humanity over the millennium has been the perfection of the art of deception. In this they excel and cannot be underestimated.

+1

Trust your instincts. Do you believe it is possible for Rudy to beat Paul in a state he did not even campaign in?

There actually might be mutable cases of vote fraud pulling in different directions. The machine counts gave +9% to Mitt Romney, is that not at least strange? That may show that the local system was rigged for Mitt Romney by John Silvestro, but the state reporting could also be wrong as evidence by the hand count areas.

Apparently how that works is the votes are entered into a touch tone telephone by the county commissioner. So A. do we trust the person working the phone, and B. how do we know that system records the numbers that the person entered into it.

 

[webber53]

From ABC,

Please read!
h ttp://blogs.abcnews.com/thenumbers/2008/01/new-hampshires.html

 

[VRP08]

If I lived in an Area that didn't count my vote, No one could keep me quiet. Where are these people? Press conf.? Local media? Why no efforts? Unlesss.....I dunno...

 

[tsetsefly]

If I lived in an Area that didn't count my vote, No one could keep me quiet. Where are these people? Press conf.? Local media? Why no efforts? Unlesss.....I dunno...

who knows, i wrote that person a personal message to contact hq but got no response...

 

[Jeremiah]

This is important

This is a great example of a suspicious member with few posts who arrives to tell us to ignore any indication of election fraud and encourages us to begin to attack HQ so that we, together, self-destruct.

I can't believe how many posters here say:

1. There was no election fraud
2. Mainstream polls are the word of God.
3. Let's all go attack HQ.

Take particular note of the use of the favorite Globalist strategy of divide and conquer. In this corner, the grassroots, in the other corner, HQ, let the fight begin.

Some of these people have been here for months pumping up their post counts to lend an air of credibility to them at this very moment when they united to douse the fires of suspicion and to direct that energy toward in-fighting. Notice the same call to attack HQ that was issued after Iowa. There are clearly dozens of them, possibly hundreds here on this forum. Don't underestimate how many resources are being employed to thwart this movement.

Be aware of this. Keep eyes and mind open. Ask questions. Don't trust these people. Their presence goes well-beyond misguided well-intended supporters. They are here to subvert this campaign, the democratic process and the greater movement to liberate America.

I agree. This is very important. It was in reply to Tuff Fish

 

[rollingpig]

We Was Robbed!!!!

 

[G-Wohl]

To all nay-sayers: I have a very close family member who is serving in public office, and the amount of work we had to go through to get fair and accurate voting is absurd. It took four recounts, with clear accusations of cheating and unfair situations both during the original voting process AND the re-counts. The reason? Our town is heavily Republican, but the family member is a Democrat. The family member DID indeed have more votes than the Republican, but because of the power those Republicans have, they tried and almost succeeded at ruining the purity of the election.

And think: This was on the LOCAL LEVEL! Imagine all the things that could have been done against Ron Paul!

We learned the lesson last year - you ALWAYS need to observe the voting process carefully and ALWAYS call a re-count by hand if there's any possible foul play! This is your RIGHT and DUTY as a citizen. Don't be fooled - people ALWAYS try to rig elections, on all levels.

Contact New Hampshire immediately. Ask for recounts of all districts with NH resident signatures - as many signatures as we can get! We NEED to have verifiable proof, because sites like libertybroadcastnetwork.org are showing that Ron Paul came in 4th, not 5th!

 

[Sebas]

I spent all night looking for PROOF. And I was insulted multiple times because of that... but I really do not care.

Anyway, seems like multiple localities have O (ZERO) votes... some people calculated the probabilities, and the results show a pretty slime chance of that happening !

Find those posts, read them, think and please act !

I also wrote this last night (I didn't sleep for 2 days... so please be indulgent)



'Brainstorm':

Originally Posted by Sebas
YES !

And, can I suggest to also consider the 'donation vs actual vote' ratio... 1 donator for every 10 actual voter ???

That can also give us a idea of the amplitude of any eventual FRAUD.

Again: But for NOW, please do not actually SAY that their is fraud... collect the PROOF first, then 'go nuclear' with the info...



The unofficial canadian 'international team' keeping a eye on 'democracy'

and this:

Originally Posted by JayDee:

I think the reason the zero votes showed up, (if they are not genuine) is the way the vote rigging on those machines is done is by applying negative votes to the systems rom card before the election. If there are more negative votes then actual votes then the result would be zero as it can not have a negative number in the total, if it did the scam would be discovered too easily.

I believe the votes are then sent by touch tone from a poll operator to a central location, so the honesty of the person using the phone comes into question as well.

There is also a split between the hand counted areas and the machine counted areas. The hand counted areas are reporting upwards of 12% but the machine areas are reporting more like 7%. That makes sense if the Dibold machines were stacked with say.. a -5% estimated total for Paul. If that is right, and I have no way of knowing at this time besides suspicion.. then Paul would have taken 3rd.



My answer:


Ok, if this is true, it's great info... but to make it useful, we have to have SOLID PROOF... don't want to hear any rumors in the national 'old media' tomorrow

Please, no 'Alex Jones conspiracies' (but he IS a great patriot !) for NOW... but if -tomorrow or later- their is proof for -even- one locality... then SPREAD THE NEWS in local newpapers/radios/tv in NH... and then the national media will 'copy' the news. (maybe with a little help from 'email-7ov3' coming from the grassroots ). . and the rest will be HISTORY !

This CAN be HUGE....

Don't forget: peaceful R3vo7ution... we got to keep the faith !
And we KNOW something is 'weird'...


Question:
Should we start with those localities with ZERO votes and compare with the info we can find with this: http://fundrace.huffingtonpost.com/neighbors.php?type=loc&addr=&zip=03282&search=Search ?


The unofficial canadian 'international team' keeping a eye on 'democracy'

p.s.
I have to go to bed for a few yours... but will be back early in the morning

Posted by JayDee:

The campaign is holding all the info for that. The FEC filings only show Q3 fund raising of donations over $200. However the Ron Paul campaign has the credit card receipts of every single donation. They can compare that data with all of them (and they could do it mechanically if they have a decent programmer on staff.) So they can compare all of the areas.

Right now every person in NH that voted for Paul should go and donate $1 dollar to the campaign, so they can lock in and verify their vote.

Source:
http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthread.php?t=82599&page=26&highlight=Sebas.



I really have to get some sleep (was suppose to hours ago...).

We (you) can find the proof... and win this ! Please try hard, and remember Florida, Ohio, etc... (these are not 'conspiracy theories' anymore... but, it's seems impossible to go back in time. But we can find proof NOW, and act NOW. Might make the difference this time)

The way we all react to this, may change this election. Others before us tried, but failed. Follow Ron Paul, and his 'meticulous ways' in fact finding (please, do not take to much time...), and then spread the facts everywhere !

 

[Paul2008]

Vote Fraud and Open Borders one in the same.

Um. Does anyone know that it was mandated they have the electronic voting machine debacle solved by 2006? Hmmm, just like the border fence that was mandated! Hmmm, what happened to it?

I invested in a company called ACCUPOLL, who had created virtual, tamper proof voting machines. They were a small company trying to take advantage of the mandate to replace all the machines. ACCUPOLL saved it's results in approx 7 places I believe and had a paper ballot! There machines used common computer parts so they were cheap! Alas, the criteria for a voting machine to be accepted kept being change until ACCUPOLL finally went out of business trying to keep up.

Now, we have the same (diebold) machines and the same vote fraud. Folks, this is not a new issue. This election has been BOUGHT AND PAID FOR.

Two predictions.

NO Ron Paul and definitely no Obama. Apparently Obama is not part of the status quo either. The election was given to Hillary.

Same two families in office for how long???? You think that's by accident?

Paul got less % of the vote in New Hampshire than he did in IOWA! Is that possible? Not really and here's why.

IOWA is a huge farming state (corn subsidies, etc) and Paul got 10% of the vote!! Yes, 10% in a state that was definitely a tough one with all the farmers.

Anyways, John (Amnesty) Mccain won New Hampshire!!!!!!!! Yeah right! I'm sure the live free or die state has forgotten Mccain is the champion for amnesty.

Unfortuanately folks, the elections already been decided.

 

[rrb]

AFTER this story was spread around the internet came this response:

"UPDATE JAN 9 9am PST: TOWN OF SUTTON CONFIRMS RON PAUL TOTALS WERE 31, NOT ZERO."

"I just got off the phone with Jennifer Call, Town Clerk for Sutton. She confirmed that the Ron Paul totals in Sutton were actually 31, and said that they were "left off the tally sheet" and it was human error.

This is not an acceptable answer, especially because one of the most common forms of fraud in a hand count system is to alter or omit results on the reporting sheet..."




http://www.blackboxvoting.org/

 

[rrb]

Memo to Diebold vote counters: In the future, do not let your zeal to perform well and impress your supervisor get the upper hand over common sense. Do not enter zero or even a low number such as 4 as this might be the size of a family who voted for ____ , and consequently they could positively id a localized voting irregularity. Thank you and keep up the good work.


Big Brother