VOTER FRAUD confirmed by voter in Sutton...

Blump For Vote Fraud.



Something wrong with that sentence. Iowa has a Caucus!

I was in Iowa and was an observer of the caucus process. I can personally say that voting fraud in Iowa would have been a piece of cake. If one were so inclined, one could vote multiple times...

That's over with though, we should focus on NH for now.

Who do we contact?
 
Whoever has concrete proof (names, and willingness to go on the record) of this (sstjean?) should email the below folks and the media immediately.

There may be evidence of voting fraud in NH. Sutton county shows 0 votes for Paul, yet
http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthread.php?t=82909&page=2
this.

Write these people requesting a recount by hand for recertification.

[email protected], [email protected], [email protected]

EVERY VOTE COUNTS!!

My email:
I am formally requesting a hand recount for the NH primary. Sutton county cannot have 0 votes for Ron Paul, as many from that county have voted for the man. Every vote counts, and I am, again, requesting a hand recount before the vote is certified.

http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthread.php?t=82909&page=1
 
If it happened in one it could have happened in others. Be sure to ask for all counties. Don't need them saying "Oops, you're right! RP got 8 votes in Sutton! We'll adjust the results right away" and leave it at that.
 
Here is the thing. We have been the "conspiracy crowd" from day 1, they will only calls us sour and everything else.

I would contact the Obama campaign first, start an uproar in that camp so everything is under the microscope and the recount is demanded by them, not us.

Obama was a HUGE upset and that is what makes me question the results.
 
Here is the thing. We have been the "conspiracy crowd" from day 1, they will only calls us sour and everything else.

I would contact the Obama campaign first, start an uproar in that camp so everything is under the microscope and the recount is demanded by them, not us.

Obama was a HUGE upset and that is what makes me question the results.

Got any addresses?
 
Well, we have proof in Suffolk..but what will that get us? THREE votes? They can discount all that. WE CAN not allow this! Go to www.wethepeoplefoundation.org and tell Bob. Donate more money to them. The NCEL is happening and the Suffolk thing may add some fuel to the fire...this lawsuit may be our only chance to end it.
 
My mom, aunt, and dad all voted for RP today in my hometown, My mom and aunt both work passing out ballots, and checking them off. I just looked at the politico map and it says their town has ZERO votes for Ron. Now i know that there isn't corruption on voting in that little town, so where they reported it must be. What do I do, anyone know???

Originally Posted by sstjean View Post
This was posted to ronpaul-801 tonight: "This town numbers are wrong wrong wrong on this map. I am from Sutton originally and my parents and one aunt all voted for Ron Paul today and Sutton says 0. So this is wrong. This is a town that had 20 people counting the ballots and I have no reason to believe that they cheated. Small town and I was born and raised there. The real numbers will come in by morning. The electronic machines in the big towns are the ones we have to worry about."

If true, they can't just be somebody's parents. They need to be names... people... pictures... interviewed.
 
bumping this post

I'm always a skeptic. I'm the last to talk about conspiracies and what not, but it does say that Paul got 0 votes... and I am aware of one person from Sutton who voted for Paul.

Are you sure they voted for Paul? If so, we need to get to the bottom of this, because someone else also said they knew 3 people there who voted for Paul. Please contact HQ!
 
To reach the Campaign Headquarters by phone, please call: (866) 675-2008 (obama)

On the phone now...on hold, that is...I feel dirty for calling....

Just called. They took my name, contact number, and are forwarding it to the legal team...now it's a waiting game...

Now onto the Paul HQ

703-248-9115 <--HQ #

CALL IT!
 
Last edited:
Are we sure that they didn't make a mistake. I agree that 0 out of a few hundred is a statistical imporobablity, well more like an impossibility.
 
Back
Top