Iwantchange
Member
- Joined
- Jan 10, 2008
- Messages
- 258
We Need To Make This A Priority And Get It Out To Everyone! So At Least If Something Does Happen People Are Aware!
Voter #1 Genoa Township, Michigan Precinct 3. Voting problems?
- Thread starter Phantom
- Start date
Falseflagop
Member
- Joined
- Jul 13, 2007
- Messages
- 1,750
SPread the word on MYSPACE, EMAIL, NEWS OUTLETS (not that it will matter but be on the record), facebook, send out bulletins, Cafferty etc !!
Truth Warrior
Banned
- Joined
- Dec 3, 2007
- Messages
- 18,789
"Those that cast the votes decide nothing. Those that count the votes decide everything." -- Joseph Stalin.
Falseflagop
Member
- Joined
- Jul 13, 2007
- Messages
- 1,750
Bump keep spreading the word, because if this is rigged RP might decide to do a recount in MICHIGAN and that will be the sprak we needed!
Someone needs to get their hands on one of these machines and snag the contents of one of these memory cards. We all know what shitty programmers the guys at Diebold are - they won't have sufficient security on them to keep anything hidden from a competent security expert. If anything fishy is going on inside the scanning machines, it would provide concrete proof. Not technically legal, but then again civil disobedience never is...
Truth Warrior
Banned
- Joined
- Dec 3, 2007
- Messages
- 18,789
Ya think? 
Does anyone know someone in a meetup group or what ever that can get over and watch what is going on at this township? Someone need to be there watching what is going on.
Not sure who or how but with a low turnout it would seem someone should be there. Can HQ get someone there? Anyone have any contacts out there?
Not sure who or how but with a low turnout it would seem someone should be there. Can HQ get someone there? Anyone have any contacts out there?
Falseflagop
Member
- Joined
- Jul 13, 2007
- Messages
- 1,750
Bump Up !
Voted Fine For Ron Paul, Genoa PCT 3, 11:40 AM
I am also a voter in Michigan, Genoa Township Precinct 3. My wife and I voted for Ron Paul at approximately 11:40 AM with no problems. We did both verify that our votes were indeed counted.
As an aside, the turnout in Michigan is extremely low at this point. We had a few inches of snow this morning in Southeast Michigan but by the time I voted only 45 votes had been made at our precinct. A precinct of 1,700 registered voters. If my math is correct, that's less than a 3% turn out so far.
The media in Michigan is predicting less than a 20% total turn out. I wouldn't be surprised at that. I think that will bode well for us.
I am also a voter in Michigan, Genoa Township Precinct 3. My wife and I voted for Ron Paul at approximately 11:40 AM with no problems. We did both verify that our votes were indeed counted.
As an aside, the turnout in Michigan is extremely low at this point. We had a few inches of snow this morning in Southeast Michigan but by the time I voted only 45 votes had been made at our precinct. A precinct of 1,700 registered voters. If my math is correct, that's less than a 3% turn out so far.
The media in Michigan is predicting less than a 20% total turn out. I wouldn't be surprised at that. I think that will bode well for us.
Falseflagop
Member
- Joined
- Jul 13, 2007
- Messages
- 1,750
Nice! Low overall turnout but BIG RON PAUL turnout!
Falseflagop
Member
- Joined
- Jul 13, 2007
- Messages
- 1,750
bump
Now that's a true American taking the time to be responsible, THANKS!!!
And I call RECOUNT!! (already, and this is why we need to get the message of recounts out there)
This is why the recount in NH was so important, people are getting the message their vote may not be counted properly, so they are checking them and asking more questions.
The county people know they can't sluff off anymore and are on their toes.
Why can they give you a printout with a random number on it, you get home and can enter it in a PUBLIC web site to check your vote. All votes are displayed. ANYONE can do a total check.
Is it really that hard?
The county people know they can't sluff off anymore and are on their toes.
Why can they give you a printout with a random number on it, you get home and can enter it in a PUBLIC web site to check your vote. All votes are displayed. ANYONE can do a total check.
Is it really that hard?
Because we sheep have let them get away with this. All votes should have a number given randomly.
Example:
My vote receipt is
Jefferson County - 100-2671
You then go to a public website listing all numbers and who it was voted for (All nuber are still private, only you have your receipt)
List:
Jefferson County
100-1311 McCain
100-1412 Romney
100-2132 Paul
100-2671 Paul
101-0019 Paul
101-0029 Romney
VERY SIMPLE PROCESS, not rocket science. Then anyone could verify if there voted was properly counted and if not could report it to the township say within a certain period of time from when it was posted, 48 hrs.
Example:
My vote receipt is
Jefferson County - 100-2671
You then go to a public website listing all numbers and who it was voted for (All nuber are still private, only you have your receipt)
List:
Jefferson County
100-1311 McCain
100-1412 Romney
100-2132 Paul
100-2671 Paul
101-0019 Paul
101-0029 Romney
VERY SIMPLE PROCESS, not rocket science. Then anyone could verify if there voted was properly counted and if not could report it to the township say within a certain period of time from when it was posted, 48 hrs.
This would VERIFY that you voted but how does this prevent VOTES BEING ADDED to a candidate???
what they need to have is SMALL precincts with small amounts of people so that there could not be large #'s of added votes to any candidate.
Good point, but at least we know our votes are counted. We can have poll watchers to verify the number entering is the number posted for that county.
Similar threads
