Vote Machine "Errors" Found in Michigan

Funny how Russia was able to easily hack our election four years ago and yet those on the left believe that after only four years our elections are now infallible.
 
Now flip those 47 counties,, and the 33 Counties affected by the other machine "glitch".

and see if 80 Counties make a difference.
 
Funny how Russia was able to easily hack our election four years ago and yet those on the left believe that after only four years our elections are now infallible.


EM.
If this is confirmed, credit should also go to Trump, RNC, Romney's talented neice and anti-nepotism activist Ronna Romney for showing vision and strong leadership on this.


icon14.png
Trump, RNC Fear Dems May ‘Rig’ Election Voting, Unveil $10 Million Plan to Fight It
02-21-2020
 
If a company wanted to count something by weight, they would count out a number of pieces and then weigh those pieces. The would then feel that if they weigh that specific weight the count would be accurate. A company just doesn't do this once. Quality control would mandate that every so often somebody count the weighted pieces that are supposed to represent a particular quantity and see if the count is still accurate. Wouldn't quality control measures be in place to make sure that the machines were counting accurately?
 
If a company wanted to count something by weight, they would count out a number of pieces and then weigh those pieces. The would then feel that if they weigh that specific weight the count would be accurate. A company just doesn't do this once. Quality control would mandate that every so often somebody count the weighted pieces that are supposed to represent a particular quantity and see if the count is still accurate. Wouldn't quality control measures be in place to make sure that the machines were counting accurately?

In a perfect world, yes. We do not live in a perfect world. Where there is a will, there is a way, and when the people who program the machines, the people who have access to modify the machines, the people who use the machines, and the CIA who can control the machines remotely all want something to happen, it happens.

Republicans should audit all places that used machines by sending an amount of ballots thru the machine and hand counting those same ballots.

That was what I was thinking on election night. A group of Democrats, Republicans, media from the right, left and center, and the election people should all transparently, and on camera, count the votes on the scannable ballots by hand, and then run them through the machine (at minimum a good sized sample, not less than 1000). And after that, follow those votes all the way downstream to ensure that everything is accurate.

Instead, we had Democrat run counting operations that were done in secret, banning observers, even blocking the windows with cardboard. If that doesn't scream corruption, nothing does.
 
In a perfect world, yes. We do not live in a perfect world. Where there is a will, there is a way, and when the people who program the machines, the people who have access to modify the machines, the people who use the machines, and the CIA who can control the machines remotely all want something to happen, it happens.



That was what I was thinking on election night. A group of Democrats, Republicans, media from the right, left and center, and the election people should all transparently, and on camera, count the votes on the scannable ballots by hand, and then run them through the machine (at minimum a good sized sample, not less than 1000). And after that, follow those votes all the way downstream to ensure that everything is accurate.

Instead, we had Democrat run counting operations that were done in secret, banning observers, even blocking the windows with cardboard. If that doesn't scream corruption, nothing does.
If the judges are honorable they would allow audits of votes based on just this instance. This shows that glitches or intentional deceit are possible. There could be multiple ways to accomplish this audit. One thing to check that would be pretty easy would be the total ballot count. Count out 5000 ballots and weigh them. Then weigh all the ballots and determine if the count of total ballots is accurate. It could even be as easy as taking a micrometer and seeing how thick the paper is and calculating how many sheets of paper are in an inch. Then measuring all the ballots.
 
Didn't someone post earlier that one county in particular completely flipped from last election? Was like 60% republican, 40% democrat, but this year it was 40/60 instead, memory fails me
 
Wow, I am not surprised at all. Although I honestly do not see this gaining any sort of traction by the mainstream. The only way this could work for Trump is he will have to provide proof (like these machines) per every case he brings up to the public so it doesn’t look like bitching to the general brainwashed public.

Never Trumpers don't care. They could find out without a doubt that the election was rigged, but they'd be okay with it because it's not their candidate.
 
Back
Top