William Tell
Member
- Joined
- Jan 3, 2014
- Messages
- 12,146
Vote in Drudge poll!
- Thread starter William Tell
- Start date
William Tell
Member
- Joined
- Jan 3, 2014
- Messages
- 12,146
Walker is in the honeymoon stage. Which will hopefully end soon, now people get to learn about why he's a bad candidate.
William Tell
Member
- Joined
- Jan 3, 2014
- Messages
- 12,146
Bump.
Walker is in the honeymoon stage. Which will hopefully end soon, now people get to learn about why he's a bad candidate.
Learn things like? I mean, we are talking about the Republican Party, the one that nominated John McCain and Mitt Romney....
Matt McGuire
Member
- Joined
- Aug 24, 2012
- Messages
- 138
Yeah, I think it's probably because most Republicans know nothing bad about Walker. He looks like a slick politician (in a good way). Once the race gets going, his unfavorability probably won't stay so low.
YesI'mALiberal
Member
- Joined
- Mar 15, 2013
- Messages
- 325
Is this site the only place in America that's unaware that Scott Walker owned last week?
Scott Walker's big week
Lots of love there, including this nugget: Walker is attracting the attention of some major conservative thought leaders, including radio host Rush Limbaugh, who said the Wisconsin governor provided “the blueprint” for Republicans if they want to win in 2016.
(aside) a mistype on the line above brought a question to mind - has anyone added "pwned" to their spellchecker dictionary?
Scott Walker's big week
Lots of love there, including this nugget: Walker is attracting the attention of some major conservative thought leaders, including radio host Rush Limbaugh, who said the Wisconsin governor provided “the blueprint” for Republicans if they want to win in 2016.
(aside) a mistype on the line above brought a question to mind - has anyone added "pwned" to their spellchecker dictionary?
Last edited:
Voted.
Current results:
Bush 4.72% (10,688 votes)
Carson 7.22% (16,356 votes)
Christie 1.53% (3,459 votes)
Cruz 13.79% (31,244 votes)
Fiorina 0.47% (1,068 votes)
Huckabee 1.49% (3,386 votes)
Palin 3.53% (8,006 votes)
Paul 12.55% (28,446 votes)
Perry 1.63% (3,698 votes)
Rubio 3.89% (8,806 votes)
Santorum 0.76% (1,713 votes)
Trump 1.44% (3,274 votes)
Walker 47% (106,505 votes)
Total Votes: 226,649
Current results:
Bush 4.72% (10,688 votes)
Carson 7.22% (16,356 votes)
Christie 1.53% (3,459 votes)
Cruz 13.79% (31,244 votes)
Fiorina 0.47% (1,068 votes)
Huckabee 1.49% (3,386 votes)
Palin 3.53% (8,006 votes)
Paul 12.55% (28,446 votes)
Perry 1.63% (3,698 votes)
Rubio 3.89% (8,806 votes)
Santorum 0.76% (1,713 votes)
Trump 1.44% (3,274 votes)
Walker 47% (106,505 votes)
Total Votes: 226,649
erowe1
Member
- Joined
- Sep 7, 2007
- Messages
- 32,183
Isn't it obvious that he is?
I mean, there's a big picture of Walker at the top with a headline about how great he's doing in polls. Drudge has been pumping him since Romney dropped out.
Putting a poll right on a page full of pro-Walker propaganda is not exactly a scientific polling method.
RonPaulFanInGA
Member
- Joined
- Nov 13, 2007
- Messages
- 12,749
Meh, flavor of the month.
I really hope someone takes off on the Democratic side against Clinton, so maybe a bored media won't spend all their time pumping-and-dumping Republican candidates, as they did in 2011.
I really hope someone takes off on the Democratic side against Clinton, so maybe a bored media won't spend all their time pumping-and-dumping Republican candidates, as they did in 2011.
Natural Citizen
Banned
- Joined
- Jan 16, 2012
- Messages
- 16,463
I just saw like 20 minutes ago there were eighty some odd thousand voted for Walker. Now he's up to near a hundred and seven thousand? Please...
Liberty74
Member
- Joined
- Sep 28, 2011
- Messages
- 2,949
I remember last time around in 2011 the candidates rose fast to the top and fell fast...Perry, Bachmann, Cain, Gingrich (although made a comeback in SC), etc.
Expect the same...
I would say it's best to be somewhere in the middle of the pack around now.
Expect the same...
I would say it's best to be somewhere in the middle of the pack around now.
So, when Ron Paul was winning the polls, it was legit and shouldn't be discredited? When Rand is losing, it's fixed?
The biggest difference I can see is the number of candidate in this poll currently happening, and the one above. The field needs to be a bit thinner to see how it would go.
The biggest difference I can see is the number of candidate in this poll currently happening, and the one above. The field needs to be a bit thinner to see how it would go.
So, when Ron Paul was winning the polls, it was legit and shouldn't be discredited? When Rand is losing, it's fixed?
The biggest difference I can see is the number of candidate in this poll currently happening, and the one above. The field needs to be a bit thinner to see how it would go.
I would chalk the Ron Paul one up to bots too. On most internet sites, no, but on a site like Drudge, yes.
Similar threads
