Vote for Ron Paul's debate performance

debate performance?

  • 1

    Votes: 3 3.0%
  • 2

    Votes: 1 1.0%
  • 3

    Votes: 4 4.0%
  • 4

    Votes: 3 3.0%
  • 5

    Votes: 7 7.0%
  • 6

    Votes: 8 8.0%
  • 7

    Votes: 18 18.0%
  • 8

    Votes: 24 24.0%
  • 9

    Votes: 16 16.0%
  • 10

    Votes: 16 16.0%

  • Total voters
    100

DjLoTi

Member
Joined
May 24, 2007
Messages
4,337
Let's do a vote... 1 for worst, 10 for best. I'll do a tally/average before I get off work!
 
I voted 6. I wasn't happy with the McCain question, and nothing really excited me in his performance. His last question was alright, but it wasn't appealing to anybody except republican bigwigs.

I voted a 6, but really... it's more like a 4-6, so I guess I'm actually a 5. But I voted 6. O well
 
Overall debate = 2

Ron's performance, I said 7 because he should have fought for the time more
 
I think he got a 7. But they asked him softball questions and barely asked him any in the first place.
 
30 second sound bites just aren't his thing, he's far to intelligent to be a walking slogan machine.
 
Dr. Paul was getting creamed out there, I put him at about 3 until the very end, then BAM a 10 answer... perhaps best of the night. So I guess he finished off about a 6. This was his worse debate.. he was just off tonight... and he wasn't even looking into the camera...
 
I'll give him an 8. He did great, but I wish he would've kicked his podium over and went "fuck this, i'm out" and throw punched everybody as he left.
 
Thing is, Ron Paul did fine...as always. Sure, we'd like to see him be a little more on offense, but his answers are always pretty good with the exception of talking above the heads of the average American at times.

The problem with this debate was the unfair amount of talk time...I think it's time to let MSNBC know what we think.
 
RP made the best of 3 minutes he got, he did excellent.

MSNBC did horrible in time allocation even if questions quality was better for the most part.
 
Back
Top