Vivek Ramaswamy’s 2024 POTUS campaign

Vivek townhall on CNN - 12/13



https://rumble.com/v419rpd-vivek-ramaswamy-town-hall-on-cnn.html
 
CLIP from SYSTEM UPDATE #199:

"Inside Job!" Vivek’s Revealing Clash w/ CNN on Jan 6
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YZxad3ye6gw
{Glenn Greenwald | 15 December 2023}




That's not what he said before it was cool.

Vivek Criticism on Trump re J6: “What Trump did last week was wrong. Downright abhorrent. Plain and simple. I’ve said it before and did so in my piece.”
https://web.archive.org/web/2021011...om/VivekGRamaswamy/status/1348946429952237569

Vivek Criticism on Trump re J6: “Both are terrifying. Unfortunately Trump’s egregious behavior last week blinds us from seeing that Big Tech’s cure is worse. Makes for a winning game for China in the long run.”
https://web.archive.org/web/2021011...om/VivekGRamaswamy/status/1348995063590735875

Vivek says All Americans are responsible for J6
https://twitter.com/user/status/1347343921605578752
 
That's not what he said before it was cool.

Vivek Criticism on Trump re J6: “What Trump did last week was wrong. Downright abhorrent. Plain and simple. I’ve said it before and did so in my piece.”
https://web.archive.org/web/2021011...om/VivekGRamaswamy/status/1348946429952237569

Vivek Criticism on Trump re J6: “Both are terrifying. Unfortunately Trump’s egregious behavior last week blinds us from seeing that Big Tech’s cure is worse. Makes for a winning game for China in the long run.”
https://web.archive.org/web/2021011...om/VivekGRamaswamy/status/1348995063590735875

Vivek says All Americans are responsible for J6
https://twitter.com/user/status/1347343921605578752
Didn't Vivek admit that he thought differently 3 years ago?
Maybe withheld video evidence changed his mind?
Didn't he say it takes a real man to admit when they are wrong?
What is your issue with him in this regard?
 
Didn't Vivek admit that he thought differently 3 years ago?
Maybe withheld video evidence changed his mind?
Didn't he say it takes a real man to admit when they are wrong?
What is your issue with him in this regard?

Every con artist claims to have changed his mind when he discovers that what he said is not popular.
The video evidence was unnecessary for seeing the truth and did not change what he condemned, he condemned the fraud protests and the demand for a redress of grievances and he placed the blame on people (including Trump) who were 100% innocent and within their rights.

At best he is a fool with his finger in the wind and it is clear he is much worse than that.
 
Every con artist claims to have changed his mind when he discovers that what he said is not popular.
The video evidence was unnecessary for seeing the truth and did not change what he condemned, he condemned the fraud protests and the demand for a redress of grievances and he placed the blame on people (including Trump) who were 100% innocent and within their rights.

At best he is a fool with his finger in the wind and it is clear he is much worse than that.
Have you ever considered becoming a politician?
It seems you have what it takes.
Who knows maybe one day it will be Swordsmyth President of the United States.
 
Vivek on the Ron Paul Liberty Report - 12/18



https://rumble.com/v41ya8k-rocking-...uest-vivek-ramaswamy.html?mref=jcwo5&mc=2sdbb
 
Last edited:
Dr. Ron Paul:
"he has a high respect for liberty."
"I find you very fascinating."
"I am pleased that you came on our program."
I think RP insinuated that Vivek is honest.


Daniel:
Nobody would watch primaries if you were not in them.
Loves when he attacked Niki Haley.
 
He is still advertising though. Just not using money on TV ads which are less and less relevant as time goes on.
Right, he's scaling down to ads that are less effective but more efficient in their cost/new donations ratio.
As returns continue to diminish he will cut back more and more and then end his campaign and take all the cash.
 
Vivek townhall on CNN - 12/13



https://rumble.com/v419rpd-vivek-ramaswamy-town-hall-on-cnn.html

Gonna mark some key replies:


9:10 ~~>

Really like his point about anchor babies and illegals.


18:40 ~~>

She asks about his previous stance on increasing the inheritance tax to 59%.

"Those books were not written as a candidate", lol, WTF does that mean?


28:45 ~~>

Whats the 200 hours of footage that he keeps referring to? Didnt they suppress 13,000 hours of footage?


40:30 ~~>

He is correct regarding agencies and bureacrats running everything but hes missing the core issue.

Most (if not all) of the agencies are unlawful and unconstitutional.

The Supreme Fraud usurped their delegated authority when they gave themselves the power of judicial review, stop giving these biased political appointees any legitimacy.


42:46 ~~>

Audience member asking a stupid question looks good, would bounce that ass.

She asks about diversity BS, Vivek has what I thought was a good reply. I think the "diversity in opinions" was more of a political reply but ok, kind of unavoidable.

 
Last edited:
Back
Top