Vivek Ramaswamy’s 2024 POTUS campaign

So... The upgrade to Trump is one that made his fortune in a considerably less ethical way than Trump? Sometimes, upgrades are not upgrades for the consumer but rather for the entity foisting it upon the populace. Toward that end, Vivek is one of those EULA updates that screw users.


Really? I think you're starting to believe the MSM lies about him. This should help...
https://www.vivek2024.com/truth-over-myth/
 
TRUMP-RAMASWAMY 2024? The GOP Frontrunner Thinks Vivek is 'Great'


Could we see a Trump-Ramaswamy ticket? The Don is certainly thinking about it…

During a recent interview with conservative talk show host Glenn Beck, the 2024 GOP frontrunner had high praise for the 38-year-old entrepreneur, saying he thinks he’s “great.”

“I think he’s great,” Trump told Beck. “Look, anybody that’s said I’m the best president in a generation … and he said it a couple of times … I have to like a guy like that.”

According to the Epoch Times, when the Don was asked about “Vice President Ramaswamy,” he responded affirmatively, saying, “He’s a very, very, very intelligent person. He’s got good energy, and he could be some form of something. I tell you, I think he’d be very good. I think he’s very good. I think he’s really distinguished himself.”

Trump also warned that Ramaswamy may have to rein in some of his rhetoric.

“He’s starting to get out there a little bit. He’s getting a little bit controversial. I got to tell him to be a little bit careful. Some things you have to hold in just a little bit, right?” President Trump said. “But he’s got a lot of good energy.”
...
https://ericbolling.com/trump-ramasw...great-read-it/
Hell yes.

Trump/Ramaswamy 2024 with RFK, Jr doing some kind of something... like Sec of State or some such like. That would be one hell of a team.

And then Ramaswamy for Prez 2028 and 2032
 
Hell yes.

Trump/Ramaswamy 2024 with RFK, Jr doing some kind of something... like Sec of State or some such like. That would be one hell of a team.

And then Ramaswamy for Prez 2028 and 2032

I can feeeeel the phreedum! /s

:tears:
 

I read and listen to everything that I respond in reference to. It is part of learning, and also required to put together accurate On the Record sheets. If/when I am wrong, I attempt to make the correction in a timely manner. If I happen to miss something, I find it generous when somebody points it out to me.

How did you like the video? Was there any specific thing that you found interesting, disagree with, or want to debate?
 
Vivek is Weak on the Fed

On his campaign website, Vivek says that we should "Limit the U.S. Fed’s scope: stabilize the dollar & nothing more," but he doesn't explain how that needs to happen. There's nothing about starting with an audit of the Fed, promoting competing currencies in the economy, and developing a plan to, eventually, end the Fed's control over our money supply.

Because of that (and a few other issues), Vivek doesn't earn my support. I acknowledge that he gets some things right (such as his reluctance to fund Ukraine), but he's not going to "unleash the American economy" if he doesn't have a monetary policy that ensures the Fed stops with the manipulation of the value of the Dollar. He should know that the American economy isn't just a fiscal issue.
 
  • Like
Reactions: PAF
Vivek: I'd Appoint Rand or Ron Paul as Chair of Federal Reserve

On his campaign website, Vivek says that we should "Limit the U.S. Fed’s scope: stabilize the dollar & nothing more," but he doesn't explain how that needs to happen. There's nothing about starting with an audit of the Fed, promoting competing currencies in the economy, and developing a plan to, eventually, end the Fed's control over our money supply.

Because of that (and a few other issues), Vivek doesn't earn my support. I acknowledge that he gets some things right (such as his reluctance to fund Ukraine), but he's not going to "unleash the American economy" if he doesn't have a monetary policy that ensures the Fed stops with the manipulation of the value of the Dollar. He should know that the American economy isn't just a fiscal issue.

Really:tears::tears::tears:...

Watch the video in the article: https://www.meidastouch.com/news/vivek-id-appoint-rand-or-ron-paul-as-chair-of-federal-reserve
 
That was a remarkably incoherent explanation on his website. You are on a website with people used to politicians attempting to use sleight of hand in their rhetoric to excuse past mistakes. Honestly, I am surprised you were taken in by it.

Very coherent to me...

Vivek is Part of Big Pharma and Made $$ on a Failed Alzheimer’s Drug:

WRONG on both. Calling Vivek part of big pharma is about as insane as calling Rumble part of Big Tech. It’s also funny because most big pharma executives really don’t like Vivek, because he called pharma’s corrupt bluff of soft coordination on which drugs they’d develop versus not to actually rescue medicines that big pharma had abandoned – and he built a multibillion dollar company of his own in the process. That’s how he ended up developing a staggering *five* new FDA-approved products, including lifesaving and life-changing therapies. That’s one of the best track records for a new biotech company in modern history, and it’s why most pharma executives aren’t particularly fond of him.

(Side note: Vivek invested early in Rumble when it was still a private company, to challenge Big Tech’s orthodoxies – in the same way Vivek’s first company Roivant challenged Big Pharma’s orthodoxies).

One of the drugs that Vivek developed was a drug for Alzheimer’s disease, through one of Roivant’s subsidiaries called Axovant. Like 99.7% of all drugs tested for Alzheimer’s disease, it failed. Unlike most of Roivant’s subsidiaries which went on to become immensely successful – and Roivant (the parent company) which is a nearly $10BN public company today – Axovant ended up failing after the Alzheimer’s drug was terminated. But the idea that Vivek made any money on that failure is a total lie. To the contrary: Vivek could have sold shares in Axovant before its failure. But he didn’t. And neither did Roivant. That was an unusual decision, and some would even call it honorable.

(The in-the-weeds critics will say: “But he sold some shares in Roivant, didn’t he?” Answer: yes, he and other shareholders were forced to sell a tiny portion of their shares in 2015 to facilitate an outside investor entering Roivant in 2015. And the shares that Roivant Vivek sold back then are worth a LOT more today than they were back then).

Bottom line: one of the therapies Vivek helped develop is a life-saving therapy in kids – as a father of two young sons, that is the accomplishment in his life that he is most proud of. He has also overseen the development of other medicines, including for psoriasis, prostate cancer, endometriosis, and uterine fibroids.
 
Very coherent to me...

Vivek is Part of Big Pharma and Made $$ on a Failed Alzheimer’s Drug:

WRONG on both. Calling Vivek part of big pharma is about as insane as calling Rumble part of Big Tech. It’s also funny because most big pharma executives really don’t like Vivek, because he called pharma’s corrupt bluff of soft coordination on which drugs they’d develop versus not to actually rescue medicines that big pharma had abandoned – and he built a multibillion dollar company of his own in the process. That’s how he ended up developing a staggering *five* new FDA-approved products, including lifesaving and life-changing therapies. That’s one of the best track records for a new biotech company in modern history, and it’s why most pharma executives aren’t particularly fond of him.

(Side note: Vivek invested early in Rumble when it was still a private company, to challenge Big Tech’s orthodoxies – in the same way Vivek’s first company Roivant challenged Big Pharma’s orthodoxies).

One of the drugs that Vivek developed was a drug for Alzheimer’s disease, through one of Roivant’s subsidiaries called Axovant. Like 99.7% of all drugs tested for Alzheimer’s disease, it failed. Unlike most of Roivant’s subsidiaries which went on to become immensely successful – and Roivant (the parent company) which is a nearly $10BN public company today – Axovant ended up failing after the Alzheimer’s drug was terminated. But the idea that Vivek made any money on that failure is a total lie. To the contrary: Vivek could have sold shares in Axovant before its failure. But he didn’t. And neither did Roivant. That was an unusual decision, and some would even call it honorable.

(The in-the-weeds critics will say: “But he sold some shares in Roivant, didn’t he?” Answer: yes, he and other shareholders were forced to sell a tiny portion of their shares in 2015 to facilitate an outside investor entering Roivant in 2015. And the shares that Roivant Vivek sold back then are worth a LOT more today than they were back then).

Bottom line: one of the therapies Vivek helped develop is a life-saving therapy in kids – as a father of two young sons, that is the accomplishment in his life that he is most proud of. He has also overseen the development of other medicines, including for psoriasis, prostate cancer, endometriosis, and uterine fibroids.

Good post, and good information, according to what is available. That still does not negate his flip-flops, and neocon positions on other issues.
 
Last edited:
Very coherent to me...

Very sad. Any astute reader is going to notice that the defense you copy/pasted from his website (and which I already read and referenced in my previous post) does extraordinarily little to defend the ethically dubious decision to acquire an already failed drug from GlaxoSmithKline and have his mother assist in reinterpreting the results to attract investors toward an already failed drug that he simply renamed.

Is he highly intelligent? Yes. Does he engage in behavior that is ethically dubious? Yes.

The analogy where he attempts to conflate his behavior with Rumble is the sort of sleight of hand that only fools those that want to be fooled. You have already went all in on him, so you are willing to be fooled. At least have some intellectual decency and admit you support him despite his ethically dubious nature.
 
Last edited:
+Rep

Good post, and good information, according to what is available. That still does not negate his flip-flops, and neocon positions on other issues.

He already linked that information previously. It is directly from the candidate's website.
 
Very sad. Any astute reader is going to notice that the defense you copy/pasted from his website (and which I already read and referenced in my previous post) does extraordinarily little to defend the ethically dubious decision to acquire an already failed drug from GlaxoSmithKline and have his mother assist in reinterpreting the results to attract investors toward an already failed drug that he simply renamed.

Is he highly intelligent? Yes. Does he engage in behavior that is ethically dubious? Yes.

The analogy where he attempts to conflate his behavior with Rumble is the sort of sleight of hand that only fools those that want to be fooled. You have already went all in on him, so you are willing to be fooled. At least have some intellectual decency and admit you support him despite his ethically dubious nature.
I'll add - never go all in on people.

Go all in on principles, and see people as generally flawed vehicles to implement those principles.

The amount of hero worship that goes on in the supposedly libertarian forums is really kind of sickening.

The reason Ron Paul was good was because he was consistently and honestly in alignment with principles. Some rare people like Amash come along too, who are somehow able to get into government. There's especially no reason to go all in on people whose primary principle is self-promotion.
 
Vivek Ramaswamy said he doesn’t think there should be mental competency tests for lawmakers despite the recent slew of health issues with members of Congress.

The 2024 hopeful told DailyMail.com Monday that he thinks it’s up to the voters to decide who governs them.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/ar...petency-tests-McConnells-second-freezing.html


As if voters are picking these senile morons and it isn't fraud.
Even if the majority is voting for them they have no right to impose senile idiots on the minority, we have a right sane leadership.
 
As if voters are picking these senile morons and it isn't fraud.
Even if the majority is voting for them they have no right to impose senile idiots on the minority, we have a right sane leadership.

And..?

So, instead of clearing out the corruption and fraud, you want to give some internal congressional committee, or some external agency they appoint and fund, the power to declare any member senile and forbid them from running?

Convenient for you, given that you hate Thomas Massie. No doubt he'd be the first to go.

If mistrust of government can be a mental illness, it can be a symptom of senility too.

Every time I turn around, it's, "They're abusing their power. Let's fix that by giving them more power to abuse."
 
Last edited:
And..?

So, instead of clearing out the corruption and fraud, you want to give some internal congressional committee, or some external agency they appoint and fund, the power to declare any member senile and forbid them from running?

Convenient for you, given that you hate Thomas Massie. No doubt he'd be the first to go.

If mistrust of government can be a mental illness, it can be a symptom of senility too.

Every time I turn around, it's, "They're abusing their power. Let's fix that by giving them more power to abuse."
If they are that far gone they will do it anyway.
Like they are trying to disqualify Trump right now.

You would complain about giving them impeachment power for high crimes and misdemeanors, or the 25thA if they did not already have those.
 
Back
Top