No. We were the only ones to file the right number of delegates (6). Each voter is allowed to vote for 6 delegates. Theoretically, if all the Ron Paul supporters voted for all six Ron Paul delegates, we probably would have won all six delegates. However, some Ron Paul supporters probably voted for a mix of Ron Paul and Uncommitted delegates.
It is something to think about for 2016. Assuming they use the same method, make sure the supporters get the word out to the voters to vote only for the 6. There is no excuse to get just 1 delegate but have the most total votes
Based on both Ron Paul only getting 1 delegate and 2 uncommitted delegates winning, it sort of seems like a lot of people were voting for the delegates, and not any candidate. Obviously technically they were, but I mean, it seems like the voters didn't even care who that delegate was supporting. Maybe these delegates are active in their communities so people voted for THEM. I just can't figure out why anyone would vote for an uncommitted delegate otherwise. Unless maybe the two people declared themselves to be uncommitted officially, but people knew who they planned on voting. Maybe they wouldn't commit just to not be bound in case something came up?)
EDIT: Ahhh...Keith..didn't see your post before I wrote the last couple sentence. I guess that makes sense. Though did they have ANY? It seems weird that a Gingrich or SAntourm supporter would vote an uncommitted delegate but that any of the committed Santorum or Gingrich ones wouldn't get in even the top 12 for alternates. Unless maybe two two uncommitted that made it basically got ALL the Santorum/Gingrich votes. (I doubt there were all that many Santorum or Gingrich voters there to begin with. Especially Gingrich. I think he is in for a rude awakening with some of these upcoming South states that he expects to be cakewalks. I think even the ones he wins will be split enough that he will get at most 60% of the delegates.)
The real question is..what was Romney thinking not making sure to get more than 3 delegates in the running? Is he being too cocky in thinking he didn't need to try harder? Not to be a downer, but if Romney had 3 more delegates, he likely would have won the "popular" vote aswell. Though strangely, it may have cost him a delegate if it split votes. What that really means is...geez Virgin Islands...you conduct your caucuses REALLY strangely!
Is the uncommitted one that pledged to Romney now bound like the other three are? I know if you declared for a candidate before the vote, you are bound but what about pledging after the vote?
