Sentient Void
Member
- Joined
- Feb 9, 2008
- Messages
- 2,472
[MEDIA=youtube]ewQl-qAtNwQ[/MEDIA]
Last edited:
What the hell happens to these people? They get it once, and then it seems to zoom out of their heads... It is too bad he didn't have the balls to change it.
I'm sure he views thestatemonopoly on violence as a tool to mold society. You'll notice here how he defends the monopoly (because if we had a competitive markets in defense and justice, we'd necessarily have chaos, of course)
What the hell happens to these people? They get it once, and then it seems to zoom out of their heads... It is too bad he didn't have the balls to change it.
I wasn't quite that jaded... but now I know the error of my ways after thinking about it. It's still a shame though. I didn't really do a whole lot of research on Obama... just kind of hated him because I was a generic Republican supporter way back in '07.Did you really think he ever planned on changing it?
The man sold out, it is obvious he is just a front man for the bankers.
The monopoly on the legitimate use of physical force is a political concept formalized by the sociologist Max Weber, in his 1918 speech Politik als Beruf (Politics as a Vocation).
Weber argued that the state cannot be characterized by its ends, since there are very few goals which no state would ever seek to achieve, and no particular task which is both exclusive to the state, and also unique to the state.
He concluded therefore that the state must be characterized by the means which it, and only it, has at its disposal: "a state is a human community that (successfully) claims the monopoly of the legitimate use of physical force within a given territory".
"Monopoly on the legitimate use of force" is a commonly used definition for what makes a state.
http://www.wordiq.com/definition/Monopoly_on_the_legitimate_use_of_force
He doesn't even try to hide it, lol.
![]()