Video update - Rand Paul on FOX Business w/ Neil Cavuto 1/4/12

I noticed Rand wasn't clapping at parts last night as well.
 
I don't get this... Why doesn't Paul simply hold GOP hostage? Elect me or I will run 3rd party and you will lose. GOP treats paul like shiet. Why not hit back? An eye for an eye? Blowback? Why is he trying to have a civilized chessgame with a bunch of pigs? Planning for Rand is silly, live in TODAY, not in 2016.
 
I don't get this... Why doesn't Paul simply hold GOP hostage? Elect me or I will run 3rd party and you will lose. GOP treats paul like shiet. Why not hit back? An eye for an eye? Blowback? Why is he trying to have a civilized chessgame with a bunch of pigs? Planning for Rand is silly, live in TODAY, not in 2016.

I don't think the GOP really wants to win. That's why Romney is the anointed one.
 
The problem is we don't even know what the US is going to look like by then. The way things are going does not look good, but you never know. Something scares me about Rand and his foreign policy stance. If he would run in 2016, would he try to appeal to neo-cons or would be more like his dad. True liberty is being anti-war.
 
Nothing substantial, really. It was a lot of third party talk, though Rand did a good job of trying to dispel the third party talk. The fact that Rand didn't clap during a comment Ron made about Iran was something Cavuto was very obsessed over, and Rand handled it about the best you could. Overall, the interview was pretty irrelevant, though not at the fault of Rand by any means.
 

Neil just kept pestering Rand on why he wasn't clapping when Ron talked about Iran, Rand said Neil is reading too much into the tea leaves. I already forget what else was disussed but Neil kept interrupting Rand.
 
I don't get this... Why doesn't Paul simply hold GOP hostage? Elect me or I will run 3rd party and you will lose. GOP treats paul like shiet. Why not hit back? An eye for an eye? Blowback? Why is he trying to have a civilized chessgame with a bunch of pigs? Planning for Rand is silly, live in TODAY, not in 2016.

The Republican Party would much rather have Obama in the White House than Ron. Not much difference between democrats and neocon republicans.
 
I don't get this... Why doesn't Paul simply hold GOP hostage? Elect me or I will run 3rd party and you will lose. GOP treats paul like shiet. Why not hit back? An eye for an eye? Blowback? Why is he trying to have a civilized chessgame with a bunch of pigs? Planning for Rand is silly, live in TODAY, not in 2016.

The GOP would view such a statement as treason. Ron Paul is bringing people into the fold of liberty, not pushing them away.
 
Give Rand a break. He's young...a freshman senator. He has political capital that he needed to collect. I'd rather have him play it safe, and not alienate the republicans.
 
Why no 2b?
images
 
Back
Top