It may be possible it was from his campaign, but I VERY much doubt he knew about it or authorized it. If that came out, his campaign would be finished, and so would his reputation. I doubt he'd stake all of that just to make some *supporters* of Ron Paul look bad.
This wasn't a favorable piece. She made the campaign seem like it was pitching a conspiracy theory. Called the independent consulting firm hired a " analysis" or "audit".
Bad reporting from the ROGUE SCHOLAR.
She has been really fair with Paul. She likes Paul.
Not so. She only "likes" him when he does something that makes other republicans look bad. But if Ron does something that makes democrats look bad in comparison, she will bash him. She pretended to like Rand too, but look how she smeared him once it started to look like he might win his election.She has been really fair with Paul. She likes Paul.
This wasn't a favorable piece. She made the campaign seem like it was pitching a conspiracy theory. Called the independent consulting firm hired a " analysis" or "audit".
Bad reporting from the ROGUE SCHOLAR.
It may be possible it was from his campaign, but I VERY much doubt he knew about it or authorized it. If that came out, his campaign would be finished, and so would his reputation.
Several days before the "Manchurian Candidate" video was released:
3 Options:
1. It was a Ron Paul supporter who does not understand blowback... Maybe a newbie
2. Mitt
3. Huntsman
What is known, is that Huntsman attempted to benefit from it.
Definitely not proof. But I'll just say that I find his statement, and the timing of the whole thing, to be highly suspicious. Hope the campaign will be careful not to make accusations without serious evidence though.
Several days before the "Manchurian Candidate" video was released:
Definitely not proof. But I'll just say that I find his statement, and the timing of the whole thing, to be highly suspicious. Hope the campaign will be careful not to make accusations without serious evidence though.