Christians, ever since their creation, have done nothing but wreak havoc on societies all across the globe.
Give me a break. Christians have been persecuting non Christians since the dawning of man. It has a history of violence.
You've obviously been reading the Christopher Hitchens school of historical "scholarship"-- intensely biased, bigoted anti-religious and anti-Christian propaganda. In real life, self-identified Christians in positions of power have been no more prone to persecuting non-Christians than members of most any major demographic have been toward persecuting non-members of that demographic. Societies with State-institutionalized emperor worship viciously persecuted those who wouldn't bend knee to the emperor, societies with "Christian" majorities and Church-States have often seen persecution of non-Christians, societies with Muslim majorities and Church-States have often seen persecution of non-Muslims, societies with white majorities have often seen persecution of non-whites, and societies with militantly-atheistic Communist States saw persecution of religious believers of all stripes-- and in point of fact, explicitly and militantly atheistic regimes like Communist China and Soviet Russia were more widely intolerant and prolifically murderous toward their populaces than any "Christian" State has ever been. Of course, you will respond by saying that the persecution seen in Communist regimes does not result from anything inherently murderous about atheism, but rather from the communism, and you're more or less right to think that, but it is equally true that the persecution seen in some "Christian" societies does not result from something inherent in the character of Christianity as distinct from most other worldviews so much as it does from the corruption intermingling with the State brings to most any belief system.
Now there is a case to be made that those who persued this type of policy are not "true Christians" like I mentioned, but the "true Christians" have also done nothing to stop it like I mentioned in my post as well.
You think this because you are a Hitchensite and are ignorant of the enormous swaths of history that militant atheist authors choose to blithely ignore or handwave. Christianity through around the first three-hundred years of its existence was intensely and almost uniformly anti-war and anti-State, to the point at which Christians were martyred en masse for refusing to bow down to the emperor or serve in his military, Christian dissenters and anti-war activists have been active in most every historical epoch since, and the entire concept of non-violent resistance utilized to great humanitarian ends--
as an alternative to violent conflict and in order to remedy persecution of minorities-- by the likes of M.K. Gandhi in India and the Civil Rights Movement in the U.S. stems explicitly from Christ's Sermon on the Mount (see Leo Tolstoy's
The Kingdom of God is Within You, which was central in inspiring Gandhi). The late Pope John Paul II was outspokenly anti-war and referred to the Iraq invasion as "a defeat for humanity." Ron Paul himself is a Christian who (explicitly citing the teachings of Christ) critiques and fights against persecution of non-Christians on Christian moral grounds, as are many thousands of his supporters.
And it would take far, far longer than the space of this internet forum post will allow to cover the immense humanitarian
good Christianity-- for all the blemishes on its institutional record (which have, incidentally, appeared most any time it has intermingled with the State)-- has wrought over the last two millennia. Suffice it to say that we would almost certainly not have anywhere near so humane a culture as we do now had Christianity never been born, and that,
on balance, Christianity has had an immensely positive impact upon civilization.
http://www.lewrockwell.com/2005/11/laurence-m-vance/the-early-christian-attitude-towards-war/
http://original.antiwar.com/justin/2005/04/04/in-defense-of-john-paul-ii-peacemaker/