[Video] Rand Paul on Hannity 9/3

That's as about of a condescending, vindictive statement as Trump could have made about Ron Paul. "Oh, he great, but the poor old fool just can't win, so by implication all you people at CPAC that keep supporting him are idiots". The fact you can't figure this out is actually a bit frightening. But hey, I'm just a punk kid, right?

what does that have to do with what Stone said on Hannity? Does everything have to turn into a fight these days?
 
Trumpsters are a lot like herpes, always popping up at inconvenient times and hard to suppress.

Constitution and Trump are antonyms when used in substitution. Cronyism and Trump are synonyms when used in substitution.

Trump is like the Robot Chicken Lil Hitler. Eminent domain states he must have all the properties. Merica needs more limousine parking decks and toupee shops.

America is over'comb' by lazy thinkers and lovers of empty rhetoric divulged in reality tv form. Liberty is the doormat of Trump and so will America if elected.

My question to the Trumpsters after removing their idol's knob out of their mouth. When he sinks further into obscurity, will y'all wake up or hop on the next flavor of the month to keep the hipster look going?
 
what does that have to do with what Stone said on Hannity? Does everything have to turn into a fight these days?

That wasn't what was being discussed in that particular interchange. William was trying to say that Trump was complementary to Ron Paul back at the 2011 CPAC, which was a total lie. I know you feel that we need to coddle the Trump supporters who have been spamming the hell out of this forum, I don't.
 
That wasn't what was being discussed in that particular interchange. William was trying to say that Trump was complementary to Ron Paul back at the 2011 CPAC, which was a total lie. I know you feel that we need to coddle the Trump supporters who have been spamming the hell out of this forum, I don't.

I don't care about Trumpsters either. Bunch of limp noodle spinless nimrods. I am using Trump's language so they can understand because Trump appeals to low information voters.
 
That wasn't what was being discussed in that particular interchange. William was trying to say that Trump was complementary to Ron Paul back at the 2011 CPAC, which was a total lie. I know you feel that we need to coddle the Trump supporters who have been spamming the hell out of this forum, I don't.

What I think is that this damn place needs to stop acting like it's FIGHT CLUB!!! It's not attractive at all.
 
I don't care about Trumpsters either. Bunch of limp noodle spinless nimrods. I am using Trump's language so they can understand because Trump appeals to low information voters.

Well, I guess you learned that it was alright to talk to people this way, because you saw the self-ordained lynch mob doing it. Here's a clue though. They have been around here for awhile, so they have more latitude, I would imagine. You, not so much.
 
What I think is that this damn place needs to stop acting like it's FIGHT CLUB!!! It's not attractive at all.

I'm fine with that, convince the Trumpsters to cool their jets and refrain from pushing falsehoods and I'll go back to selling soap. :p
 
Rand needs to stop worrying about convincing us that Trump is not Conservative or a disaster and worry about talking about the Constitution, Monetary Policy, the Economy, winning a General Election, growing the party, limiting government, convincing voters he can "manage" government effectively, and negotiate with foreign countries. Rand is doing himself a 100% disservice by not pushing himself.
 
Rand needs to stop worrying about convincing us that Trump is not Conservative or a disaster and worry about talking about the Constitution, Monetary Policy, the Economy, winning a General Election, growing the party, limiting government, convincing voters he can "manage" government effectively, and negotiate with foreign countries. Rand is doing himself a 100% disservice by not pushing himself.

I'd agree or see your point . . . but it IS the question being asked by the media over and over,
and Rand handles these questions well imo.

Rand will support the nominee as he would have in the 2010 Kentucky Senate race - a good anecdotal account that makes you believe what Senator Dr. Paul is saying . . . he will support the GOP nominee . . . Hillary Clinton emails have cemented the notion she has bad judgment.

Rand: Trump eminent domain history is "antithetical" to freedom, so it may not be enthusiastic support.
 
Thanks William, but I'm just not going to be able to get past what I watched him do on his national tv program while Ron was running for President. I used to like him, so I didn't come by this lightly.


Tucker is a mainstream conservative journalist and I suspect when Governor Jesse started rambling on about 9/11 conspiracies Tucker decided his future viability was at stake. The 9/11 truthers hurt Ron in 2007-08 and again in 2011-12.
 
Roger Stone an old Trump informal adviser just said Trump didn't want the establishment to pull the same crap they did on Doctor Ron Paul.

You don't even know who Roger Stone is. He's an old Republican operative going back to Richard Nixon

Behind The Scenes Of The Donald Trump - Roger Stone Show
http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showth...e-Scenes-Of-The-Donald-Trump-Roger-Stone-Show
The three main takeaways you need to keep in mind in the Roger Stone-Donald Trump story are:

  1. Roger Stone’s dirty tricks specialty is manipulating voter fractures, and weaponizing anti-establishment politics to serve the electoral needs of mainstream Republican candidates;
  2. Roger Stone and Donald Trump have been working together since the mid-1980s, mostly on sleazy campaigns to help Trump’s casino business, but also in politics;
  3. Roger Stone and Donald Trump worked together in at least two major “black bag” operations manipulating anti-establishment politics to help the mainstream Republican presidential candidate
 
Back
Top