[Video] Rand Paul on Hannity 8/26

[klamath]

eminent domain is one of the best ways to take trump out...there is no floundering around for trump to get out of it. fact is, he has used it to try and take people's personal property.

vast majority of americans will not stand for that.

To build a limousine parking lot, no less, that shows so much carring for the middle class.

 

[luctor-et-emergo]

eminent domain is one of the best ways to take trump out...there is no floundering around for trump to get out of it. fact is, he has used it to try and take people's personal property.

vast majority of americans will not stand for that.

Add that to the fact that Rand is the best man to challenge ***** on that. He is the only one with any credibility on fighting cronyism.

 

[Jan2017]

Great 4 and a half minutes of Rand on Hannity show -

I love the comment when Rand is anecdotal about when he goes into inner cities . . . "They (All people) are not ready to become GOP yet, but . . ."

and the suggestion of a Trump v. Rand debate on Hannity show . . . oh my !

 

[Todd]

That was good.

Yep. A good 5 minutes.

1 Hour for Trump several weeks back.

 

[Valli6]

Trump supporters... Ugh.

For weeks, I've been posting comments about Trump's eminent domain abuse on different websites, mostly breitbart. I keep posting the link to that 2:44 video -
TRUMPED: The Donald, The Widow & Eminent Domain ... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SmM4ZBoppNQ

Believe it or not, Trump's numpskulls keep saying they don't care!
They respond with things like:

"So what? It's legal."
"It's for the greater good!"
"That woman is selfish."
"We need eminent domain for roads!"
​

Then again, most of the Trump supporters seem so politically uniformed that I'm quite certain they are only posting because they're being paid by someone to do so. They never express any knowledge of government, constitutional vs unconstitutional practices, nothing about economics - appear to be oblivious to Keynes, and Austrian economics - never post any facts or links!

They only post about what Trump says he will do and how wonderful it's going to be, and how finally someones looking out for the "little guy". It's astonishing! They talk exactly like the very dumbest of the Obama supporters back in 2007.

( I may have to create a new thread just to post all the crazy, childish things Trump supporters say... but it would get so long!)

 

[LatinsforPaul]

Then again, most of the Trump supporters seem so politically uniformed that I'm quite certain they are only posting because they're being paid by someone to do so. They never express any knowledge of government, constitutional vs unconstitutional practices, nothing about economics - appear to be oblivious to Keynes, and Austrian economics - never post any facts or links!

They only post about what Trump says he will do and how wonderful it's going to be, and how finally someones looking out for the "little guy". It's astonishing! They talk exactly like the very dumbest of the Obama supporters back in 2007.

( I may have to create a new thread just to post all the crazy, childish things Trump supporters say... but it would get so long!)

Face it, Trump supporters are the Republican version of Obama supporters.

 

[klamath]

Face it, Trump supporters are the Republican version of Obama supporters.

Exactly. Should he get elected another round of hows the "hopey changey" working out for you?

 

[squirl22]

Face it, Trump supporters are the Republican version of Obama supporters.

And their candidates are very similar: narcissitic, thin-skinned, celebrity.

If you want to read what Trump supporters say, go to The Right Scoop..it is really pathetically sad. These are former Cruz supporters, now fully engulfed with Trump mania. They know nothing about anything and fortunately most of them probably never vote anyway.

 

[Dianne]

Good interview.

 

[nikcers]

Rand totally missed the point by following the medias narrative, but maybe it was strategy, and I hope it works. BLM isn't about policy change its about bringing attention to injustice that gets ignored by the main stream media. These are people who feel victimized, they are above the media influence and know that there is only one way to get the medias attention, they feel like when someone is killed by law enforcement they are being made as an example and just want to be told that they are loved. These are people that will carry his torch if he carries their torch.

 

[Chieppa1]

Rand totally missed the point by following the medias narrative, but maybe it was strategy, and I hope it works. BLM isn't about policy change its about bringing attention to injustice that gets ignored by the main stream media. These are people who feel victimized, they are above the media influence and know that there is only one way to get the medias attention, they feel like when someone is killed by law enforcement they are being made as an example and just want to be told that they are loved. These are people that will carry his torch if he carries their torch.

He is carrying their torch. Be he's white and from Kentucky. Go on Twitter, read their responses to him today. They are so low IQ responses it's amazing.

 

[Jackie Moon]

For weeks, I've been posting comments about Trump's eminent domain abuse on different websites, mostly breitbart. I keep posting the link to that 2:44 video -
TRUMPED: The Donald, The Widow & Eminent Domain ... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SmM4ZBoppNQ

Believe it or not, Trump's numpskulls keep saying they don't care!
They respond with things like:

"So what? It's legal."
"It's for the greater good!"
"That woman is selfish."
"We need eminent domain for roads!"
​

Then again, most of the Trump supporters seem so politically uniformed that I'm quite certain they are only posting because they're being paid by someone to do so. They never express any knowledge of government, constitutional vs unconstitutional practices, nothing about economics - appear to be oblivious to Keynes, and Austrian economics - never post any facts or links!

They only post about what Trump says he will do and how wonderful it's going to be, and how finally someones looking out for the "little guy". It's astonishing! They talk exactly like the very dumbest of the Obama supporters back in 2007.

( I may have to create a new thread just to post all the crazy, childish things Trump supporters say... but it would get so long!)

Yes, I've seen more of that Trump supporter talk than I would have ever wanted to over the last week. Some of them will put the blinders on and say "that just shows how smart of a business man he is".

So yeah, there are a certain percentage of his supporters that are not interested in the actual issues and probably won't give him up no matter what he says or what he's done. Will those people actually vote though, especially in caucus states like Iowa?

But the majority of his poll support are not those people. A lot of them are not paying attention yet, don't know the details about him but like his style and get caught up in all the attention given to him. And he's done a good job at making himself a victim. If you don't like the media, and the media is attacking Trump, then people's natural reaction is to pick a side and defend Trump.

They aren't hardcore supporters, they're used to picking a candidate and then moving on to another one. They're the one's that were for Bachmann, and then Cain, and then Gingrich etc. They are open to multiple options, and they get behind the one that is currently leading. Those are the people to show things like this to. They can and will eventually drop him.

 

[FSP-Rebel]

Yeah, he looked quite strong and on point in this interview. Tonight's Special Report w/ Bret Baier had a nice segment on his trip out west which was quite surprising. However, they brought up how Carly won't make the next debate before hand while showing Rand in 10th place which was kind of deliberate imo. Still seemed like a puff piece for Rand which is what he's owed all things considering.

 

[65fastback2+2]

Rand totally missed the point by following the medias narrative, but maybe it was strategy, and I hope it works. BLM isn't about policy change its about bringing attention to injustice that gets ignored by the main stream media. These are people who feel victimized, they are above the media influence and know that there is only one way to get the medias attention, they feel like when someone is killed by law enforcement they are being made as an example and just want to be told that they are loved. These are people that will carry his torch if he carries their torch.

rand missed the point? No he didnt...all he admitted was the problem affects more than black people and that if they want to be true about their cause, it should be #alllivesmatter

 

[nikcers]

rand missed the point? No he didnt...all he admitted was the problem affects more than black people and that if they want to be true about their cause, it should be #alllivesmatter

No, because that's the medias narrative of what their movement represents. If anything it could be #injusticeexists, but that doesn't create headlines so that would invalidate their movement. They are people who feel like the media never reports injustice. They are people who feel like the media parades the deaths of their neighbors and family members to serve as examples of people who break our laws. They are people who feel that when they get pulled over for doing 5 over when they aren't doing 5 over that they might get shot. They are people who will do whatever it takes to get the medias attention though, their sentiment is real even their media narrative is something different because otherwise they would have no voice, and we wouldn't be talking about it.

 

[twomp]

Rand totally missed the point by following the medias narrative, but maybe it was strategy, and I hope it works. BLM isn't about policy change its about bringing attention to injustice that gets ignored by the main stream media. These are people who feel victimized, they are above the media influence and know that there is only one way to get the medias attention, they feel like when someone is killed by law enforcement they are being made as an example and just want to be told that they are loved. These are people that will carry his torch if he carries their torch.

No they won't. Rand Paul is white. And this group is called "Black Lives Matter". Do you think they are interested in carrying the white man's torch? I think not. They should change their name if they really cared.

 

[r3volution 3.0]

As long as BLM thinks the root cause of the problem is racism and/or insufficient free shit, there is no common ground between us.

Rand's right to criticize them (though calmly & without getting into an extended exchange), and focus his energies on more rational elements within the black community.

 

[T.hill]

rand missed the point? No he didnt...all he admitted was the problem affects more than black people and that if they want to be true about their cause, it should be #alllivesmatter

Rand isn't wrong when he says a better rallying point would be #AllLivesMatter or #InnocentLivesMatter because it wouldn't be as racially polarizing and would be perceived in a better light by more people, which could win more people over to their cause. However, many of those in the #BlackLivesMatter movement see the #AllLivesMatter thing as a slight to their cause, because they believe it dilutes their message by making it too generalized to mean anything substantive. To understand why you have to realize these people believe their problems to not be economic in nature, instead they believe their suffering to be the result of racism. It isn't government law and regulation that is keeping them from advancing their lives forward, it is because white people hate black people. Also, many in the #BlackLivesMatter movement are reactionary marxists or anarcho-communists who only represent a small fraction of the black community as a whole, in actuality there are probably more white people than black people within their ranks.

As a student of Austrian economics Rand understands that many of the problems that are inflicted onto many black people is really a problem that is shared by all poor people of all races. The reason why black people are so poor and more importantly why they continue to be poor is because of the regulations imposed onto them that others may be able to afford. The historical reason why so many black people became poor relative to other races was a combination of white flight which saw a loss of capital for those areas, overly burdensome regulations - like the minimum wage - which kept those areas inhabited by black majorities from restoring their capital structure, zoning laws which although has the same negative effects as most regulations actually explicitly bans businesses from starting-up in residential areas, and drug laws which forms black markets that poor people flock to that have no other alternative that leads to increases in violence and consequently arrests. These arrests makes people felons which limits the ability of many to participate in the market economy at all. All of this is generally ignored by conservatives who simply believe that the welfare state destroys the incentive structure of black communities to work, which is partially true, but it is important to understand that isn't as simple as black people choosing not to work. It is a matter of an entire race of people being completely excluded - by law - from the economic system.

All of this and more gives rise to our current day inner cities.

 

[nikcers]

I am not saying that he doesn't understand, what I am saying is Kalief Browder thought his life didn't matter and ended it. Rand Paul has been one of the few politicians to say that people like Kalief Browder have been wronged by society. Rand doesn't have to tell society that they are wrong, what I am saying is he should focus on telling the Kalief Browder's out there that he carries their torch, and that their lives do matter. That's what everyone wants to hear from a politician.

 

[PCKY]

I am not saying that he doesn't understand, what I am saying is Kalief Browder thought his life didn't matter and ended it. Rand Paul has been one of the few politicians to say that people like Kalief Browder have been wronged by society. Rand doesn't have to tell society that they are wrong, what I am saying is he should focus on telling the Kalief Browder's out there that he carries their torch, and that their lives do matter. That's what everyone wants to hear from a politician.

He framed up his discussion just this way. Innocentlivesmatter...