[Video] Rand Paul on Fox News Special Report 10/7/15

he did good. I wouldn't say he nailed it is knocked it out of the park until he stops saying "I think" before every answer.

re watch it and if you skip his saying i think before everything it comes off much more secure and persuasive.

remember that voters doing like thinking, they just do what they're told.
tell them the competitions foreign policy is reckless, not just that it is in your humble opinion.

I think he is getting there. One day we will see a fierce Rand.
 
he did good. I wouldn't say he nailed it or knocked it out of the park until he stops saying "I think" before every answer.

re watch it and if you skip his saying i think before everything it comes off much more secure and persuasive.

remember that voters don't like thinking, they just do what they're told.
tell them the competitions foreign policy is reckless, not just that it is in your humble opinion.

I can't not listen for him to say I think now.. I didn't even notice it At first, then it was something that was annoying, but now it's like hearing a song that plays on the radio all the time that you hate but you end up mouthing the words to the song anyways uncontrollably.
 
I think he is getting there. One day we will see a fierce Rand.

Hulk Smash? I think anger can work wonders, he just needs to show anger in the right context. People say he doesn't emotionally connect with his audience well enough, maybe its because his audience is angrier than him. I think he might have his chance soon, Putin wants to play Russian Roulette with Syria, and the crazies running for Potus want to out crazy each other.
 
Ron Fornier (the guy on Rand's right) is a senior editor for National Review. He's evil...has never liked Rand Paul. Neither does the lady to Fornier's right. Laura Ingraham is (not really fond of his immigration plan) a fan for the most part.

No he's not at National Review. He does write for National Journal.
 
Rand was on his A-game on this one. Looked and sounded presidential, with well-articulated answers. Also, a significantly better response this time to the sagging-poll-numbers question. Not whiny, added some humor, but then reiterated that he is going to keep presenting his message and staying true to what he believes
 
Good show from Rand. Articulate and clear that he's different but not weak.

I like how he answered the last question by bringing in Lois Lerner, that still rings a bell with a lot of Fox viewers I think. Lots of these things generally work with keywords. Mention the right ones and people like you. He did fine in that department.
 
he did good. I wouldn't say he nailed it or knocked it out of the park until he stops saying "I think" before every answer.

re watch it and if you skip his saying i think before everything it comes off much more secure and persuasive.

remember that voters don't like thinking, they just do what they're told.
tell them the competitions foreign policy is reckless, not just that it is in your humble opinion.

Well, it's better than "The interesting thing is is..."

:cool:
 
Last edited:
The hostility was on full display for everybody to see and no doubt it may influence low information voters who are looking for cues instead of substance. Rand could not possibly do better though, he was great. I am not sure why he did agree to this interview format - 4 panelists against a candidate. Did anybody in this race ever do that ? Is he feeling so strong that he thinks he is invincible ? If so, this is super cool. :)

James Bond style--walk right into Goldfinger's trap because it's the only way to get through the door at all. You have to be good to do that and get away with it.

We all know that's what moves like this amount to. This was a 007-quality hostile infiltration of Murdoch's RINO-Land. He walked into the lair of a whole squad of enemy soldiers and lived to tell the tale. How do we make the general public see what we see?
 
i wish he'd do something with his hair....


:rolleyes:

I think the shorter the better. I love Rand and support him with all my heart but I do worry about the hair because so many people vote against people when they don't some physical aspect. They can't even hear what he says because they are so swallow and can't get beyond not liking his hair.

The interview was great and I like that he acknowledged that people don't like his hair. I think he handled himself very well.
 
Hulk Smash? I think anger can work wonders, he just needs to show anger in the right context. People say he doesn't emotionally connect with his audience well enough, maybe its because his audience is angrier than him. I think he might have his chance soon, Putin wants to play Russian Roulette with Syria, and the crazies running for Potus want to out crazy each other.

Not angry Rand... Confident Rand. This Rand:

 

Were-gonna-need-a-bigger-box-1.jpg
 
I think the shorter the better. I love Rand and support him with all my heart but I do worry about the hair because so many people vote against people when they don't some physical aspect. They can't even hear what he says because they are so swallow and can't get beyond not liking his hair.

The interview was great and I like that he acknowledged that people don't like his hair. I think he handled himself very well.

yep. At least he has normal eyebrows..:p
 
Last edited:
I think the shorter the better. I love Rand and support him with all my heart but I do worry about the hair because so many people vote against people when they don't some physical aspect. They can't even hear what he says because they are so swallow and can't get beyond not liking his hair.

The interview was great and I like that he acknowledged that people don't like his hair. I think he handled himself very well.

Maybe the best thing he could do is shave his head. Imagine the free publicity he could get from that.
 
Back
Top