[Video] Maddow show covers Ron Paul delegate domination in Maine and Nevada

[jct74]

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/3096434/#47331411

 

[neverseen]

Oh that's nice.

 

[ShaneEnochs]

Why do they always add in that disclaimer at the end? "No, Ron Paul is not going to secure the Republican nomination..."

 

[Bruno]

Why do they always add in that disclaimer at the end? "No, Ron Paul is not going to secure the Republican nomination..."

Networks will fire them otherwise.

 

[sailingaway]

did you put it on the front page for tomorrow's primaries?

-- waited for five minutes politely which is about as long as I can be polite. I'll put it up.

 

[J_White]

lol, such a joke !! thats a good point, why care about this small little delegate wins, since he already has the nomination in his pocket ?

is he correct about the 8 states ? i m not sure about WA yet.

 

[dancjm]

Man, Rachel Maddow looks tired.

 

[thesnake742]

Anyone else find it creepy that in Rachel's absence, they have a guy who looks and sounds exactly like her?

 

[jct74]

did you put it on the front page for tomorrow's primaries?

no, I thought maybe it wasn't worthy with the disclaimer at the end but the rest of it was pretty good. whatever you want to do is cool.

 

[sailingaway]

It is there now. Yeah, I thought about the disclaimer but....

 

[opinionatedfool]

Networks will fire them otherwise.

^This. When you go down the food chain, Bain Capital eventually owns a lot of the networks.

 

[sailingaway]

lol, such a joke !! thats a good point, why care about this small little delegate wins, since he already has the nomination in his pocket ?

is he correct about the 8 states ? i m not sure about WA yet.

None of us are sure about Washington yet.

 

[wetroof]

I think he just mimics the way she talks. also maybe she wrote this segment...

 

[speciallyblend]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=McNnhM3BynU<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=McNnhM3BynU">

 

[DanK22]

Why do they always add in that disclaimer at the end? "No, Ron Paul is not going to secure the Republican nomination..."

It's priming; any mention that Ron Paul is winning is so frightening to their viewers that they add these disclaimers to quell their fears. It's the equivalent of saying 'everything is fine, go back to sleep'.

 

[DamianTV]

Man, Rachel Maddow looks tired.

She's so tired, she is starting to look like a GUY!

 

[Tyler_Durden]

Why do they always add in that disclaimer at the end? "No, Ron Paul is not going to secure the Republican nomination..."

Networks will fire them otherwise.

I would sh*t my pants, choke on my drink and fall out of my chair if I ever heard:

"Ron Paul has a chance to secure the nomination."

 

[walt]

Anyone else find it creepy that in Rachel's absence, they have a guy who looks and sounds exactly like her?

Totally. Like I could imagine the training she gave him. I'll not post that because it would be NSFW.

 

[speciallyblend]

come on folks, they at least covered it, give them a break better then the other networks did. give some love and stop bashing. geez http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EhbxI5eVnM4<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EhbxI5eVnM4">

 

[Occam's Banana]

It is there now. Yeah, I thought about the disclaimer but....

... but since pretty much *anything* the MSM has to say about Ron Paul will include the disclaimer, we might as well get as much mileage as we can out of the positive narrative preceding the disclaimer ...

(good call, IMO)