Video: Jack Hunter calling out Dana Bash on Freedom Watch 1/12

[Tyler_Durden]

[MEDIA=youtube]rAaKfavPd_w[/MEDIA]

 

[Tyler_Durden]

Bump. Video added!

 

[green73]

bump

 

[Nate-ForLiberty]

Man, we have some really sharp people in this movement.

 

[affa]

nice video. bump.

 

[FriedChicken]

If I had cable I would def. watch freedom watch regularly.

 

[Tom in NYC]

Jack, Tom Woods and Rand are as witty and sharp as any surrogates we could hope for. I hope to see more of them in the coming weeks.

 

[Patrick Henry]

Judge: "Your friend Jim Demint can change things around in SC."

IOW, work him for an endorsement.

How beholden to the military industrial complex is Demint?

 

[CJLauderdale4]

Bump

 

[GeorgiaAvenger]

Jack helping to write DeMint's book? nice

 

[doronster195]

Man, we have some really sharp people in this movement.

Absolutely, I would say we've already made a ton of progress that we can be proud of! A big part is due to the grassroots, but those in the public eye that have been supporting Paul have been a huge asset!

 

[devil21]

Man, we have some really sharp people in this movement.

Indeed he is! Myself and some other forum members went out for drinks with Jack after the May 5 debate. He's smart as a tack and a nice guy to boot. A definite asset to this movement. Im thrilled to see him getting a wider and wider audience.

 

[1000-points-of-fright]

I'm going to defend Dana. Here's what I think she was trying to say... "I'm sure you talk to Republicans, just like I do, who are worried..."

She didn't mean she was worried along with Republicans. She meant she was talking to them just like John King was talking to them. Having been on the air, I know what it's like to try and keep your thoughts and mouth coordinated especially when you're not reading from a script.

I'm not saying she and the media aren't biased. Hell, maybe she is worried. But I'm willing to cut her some slack on this one. I think this is one of those gotcha controversies that make people (us in this case) look petty.

 

[Tyler_Durden]

I'm going to defend Dana. Here's what I think she was trying to say... "I'm sure you talk to Republicans, just like I do, who are worried..."

She didn't mean she was worried along with Republicans.

I'm not saying she and the media aren't biased. Hell, maybe she is worried. But I'm willing to cut her some slack on this one. I think this is one of those gotcha controversies that make people (us in this case) look petty.

I would give her benefit of the doubt on that statement. However, when she tried to do a gotcha moment the other day and Jesse Benton interrupted and stopped the interview - she was wrong. She even wrote a crappy article that same morning.

 

[BigByrd47119]

I'm going to defend Dana. Here's what I think she was trying to say... "I'm sure you talk to Republicans, just like I do, who are worried..."

She didn't mean she was worried along with Republicans. She meant she was talking to them just like John King was talking to them. Having been on the air, I know what it's like to try and keep your thoughts and mouth coordinated especially when you're not reading from a script.

I'm not saying she and the media aren't biased. Hell, maybe she is worried. But I'm willing to cut her some slack on this one. I think this is one of those gotcha controversies that make people (us in this case) look petty.

I disagree. Its not like she stuttered, she didn't try to rephrase what she said, hell, she didn't even give any "embarrassed" physical communication signals. She said exactly what she was intending to say considering she did not have a script to go off of and is probably kicking herself for saying it now.

Guilty? Yes. Unforgivable? Absolutely not. It would help a lot if she clarified at the very least.

 

[helmuth_hubener]

It's not like that one clip is the only incriminating evidence. She hates Paul. She loves the status quo. She is a horrible person. End of story. She should be fired.

Since she is the one who has been assigned to cover Ron Paul, and since she's been obnoxious and burned her bridges to the very man she's supposed to be covering, even infinitely stupid and evil CNN might realize that it might make sense to replace her with someone the candidate might actually be comfortable with and willing to talk to. But CNN is probably too stupid and blinded by bias to recognize simple journalistic reality.

 

[bebliss]

Anyone else smells an endorsement from Sen. Jim DeMint before SC primary?

 

[Brian4Liberty]

Most of the people in the media have a personal bias against Ron. Many of them have been letting it cloud their reporting. Heck, Erin Burnett made a half-joke today on CNN basically saying a SuperPAC needed to go after him.

 

[Brian4Liberty]

Anyone else smells an endorsement from Sen. Jim DeMint before SC primary?

No, can't see it happening.

 

[michaelwise]

Excellent analysis of the lame stream media by Jack Hunter.