Red Green
Member
- Joined
- May 7, 2011
- Messages
- 747
These two are not dependent on each other. Nothing makes the government-student relation special. They should be able to evaluate the creditworthiness of the student and make a proper decision whether a loan should be granted based on sound market principles. If they feel underwriting a loan requires an enslavement of the student then they probably should not be doing it.
They pretty much are: the loans are given with govt underwriting, which means the govt (you and I) are co-signers. So let's say this dumb bitch runs up student loans of $80,000 getting her master's degree in Women and Multicultural studies. Now, she decides to try and get a job and ends up waiting tables at IHOP. Since she has no real assets at this point, declaring bankruptcy is pretty easy (i.e. she has nothing to lose). When the debt against her is discharged, the lender then turns to the co-signers to collect (that would be you and I).
So, first you need to get the govt underwriting out of the way. Now, tell me how poor students are going to be able to secure tuition loans without the non-discharge in place?