Video: Alex Jones Responds To $45M Sandy Hook Verdict And The Future Of Infowars

25 minutes in an all it is so far is a pep rally for AJ and ifowars not one clip of trial yet. "its about you the audience... they are coming for you...."
 
@Sonny Tufts and any other people that consider that they know law, is Robert Barnes now ripe for a defamation suit by the judge? If somebody watches the video posted here and voices criticism about the judges handling of the case, will Robert Barnes be sued out of business? Can any person voice their opinion and say I think that John Doe lied and did this or that and not be sued? Can a judge be sued for defamation? One point made in the video was that if they had text messages from the phone it would be all over the media and the only text they had was from Watson saying this is like Sandy Hook. MSM usually doesn't hold back.

Is Robert Barnes a respectable, knowledgable lawyer or a clown? If he is respectable, why would he spend an hour promoting AJ?
 
Last edited:
GlennwaldSnowdenAssanged said:
@Sonny Tufts and any other people that consider that they know law, is Robert Barnes now ripe for a defamation suit by the judge? If somebody watches the video posted here and voices criticism about the judges handling of the case, will Robert Barnes be sued out of business? Can any person voice their opinion and say I think that John Doe lied and did this or that and not be sued? Can a judge be sued for defamation? One point made in the video was that if they had text messages from the phone it would be all over the media and the only text they had was from Watson saying this is like Sandy Hook. MSM usually doesn't hold back.

Is Robert Barnes a respectable, knowledgable lawyer or a clown? If he is respectable, why would he spend an hour promoting AJ?
Click to expand...
I've seen some Robert Barnes videos before and I think he's legit (though I can't say for sure). As for why a legit guy would spend an hour promoting AJ, I didn't watch the video but I'm guessing he might see this as an important case for freedom of speech in this country. Personally, that's how I see it. The idea of being sued for having a differing opinion seems crazy to me. And a $50M penalty (assuming that's the total number) is far crazier. Though I admit I haven't followed this case closely at all.
 
BortSimpson said:
I've seen some Robert Barnes videos before and I think he's legit (though I can't say for sure). As for why a legit guy would spend an hour promoting AJ, I didn't watch the video but I'm guessing he might see this as an important case for freedom of speech in this country. Personally, that's how I see it. The idea of being sued for having a differing opinion seems crazy to me. And a $50M penalty (assuming that's the total number) is far crazier. Though I admit I haven't followed this case closely at all.
Click to expand...
If Robert Barnes goes on AJ and says the judge had an agenda and did a terrible job, isn't that defamation? If people that see that video confront the judge while she is in public and she feels harmed.....??
 
vita3 said:
American politics....it’s all for sale
Click to expand...

The elites own whatever they so wish. Nothing has changed since medieval times. Most of the country is just clueless unless they are effected by it since the elites control all forms of information. So obviously they will not let the truth be known about the favored class divide in this country.
 
trump-alex-jones-theyre-after-you.png
 
The comments on various articles related to this case are seriously scary. I think a lot of them are shill postings but are still downright unhinged and scary. People have lost their f'in minds.

Oh yeah, and SH was a FEMA drill, that's all.
 
GlennwaldSnowdenAssanged said:
[MENTION=41772]Sonny Tufts[/MENTION] skip to 58 minute mark.
Click to expand...


A few things the guy didn't mention:

1. Jones was found to be in contempt of court even before the trial started, failing to produce witnesses and materials relevant to the procedures. Consequently, Jones and Infowars were fined a total of $126,000 in October and December 2019. The judge imposing these fines was not the same judge who presided at the hearing on damages.

2. Rule 215.2(b) of the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure provides:

If a party or an officer, director, or managing agent of a party or a person designated under Rules 199.2(b)(1) or 200.1(b) to testify on behalf of a party fails to comply with proper discovery requests or to obey an order to provide or permit discovery, including an order made under Rules 204 or 215.1, the court in which the action is pending may, after notice and hearing, make such orders in regard to the failure as are just, and among others the following:...

(5) an order striking out pleadings or parts thereof, or staying further proceedings until the order is obeyed, or dismissing with or without prejudice the action or proceedings or any part thereof, or rendering a judgment by default against the disobedient party
Click to expand...

3. The default judgments in the Texas case came only after Jones repeatedly failed to hand over documents and evidence as ordered by the court, which the judge characterized as "flagrant bad faith and callous disregard for the responsibilities of discovery under the rules."

Jones has only himself and his bloated ego to blame. Fuck him and the horse he rode in on.
 
Last edited:
Sonny Tufts said:
A few things the guy didn't mention:

1. Jones was found to be in contempt of court even before the trial started, failing to produce witnesses and materials relevant to the procedures. Consequently, Jones and Infowars were fined a total of $126,000 in October and December 2019. The judge imposing these fines was not the same judge who presided at the hearing on damages.

2. Rule 215.2(b) of the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure provides:



3. The default judgments in the Texas case came only after Jones repeatedly failed to hand over documents and evidence as ordered by the court, which the judge characterized as "flagrant bad faith and callous disregard for the responsibilities of discovery under the rules."

Jones has only himself and his bloated ego to blame. $#@! him and the horse he rode in on.
Click to expand...
I wouldn't know what he did or didn't do. From the video I shared, that guy stated that he provided ton's of stuff. How would you or I know if he provided everything he could and the judge would never be satisfied?
 
[MENTION=41772]Sonny Tufts[/MENTION] do you think Assange will get a fair trial? Do you think Assange is guilty of something that deserves prosecution?
 
Sonny Tufts said:
A few things the guy didn't mention:

1. Jones was found to be in contempt of court even before the trial started, failing to produce witnesses and materials relevant to the procedures. Consequently, Jones and Infowars were fined a total of $126,000 in October and December 2019. The judge imposing these fines was not the same judge who presided at the hearing on damages.

2. Rule 215.2(b) of the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure provides:



3. The default judgments in the Texas case came only after Jones repeatedly failed to hand over documents and evidence as ordered by the court, which the judge characterized as "flagrant bad faith and callous disregard for the responsibilities of discovery under the rules."

Jones has only himself and his bloated ego to blame. Fuck him and the horse he rode in on.
Click to expand...

Yeah, screw that whole 7th Amendment right to jury trial thing. He pissed off a judge so therefore his constitutional rights are to be ignored and a summary judgment entered without a jury trial. Sounds legit....
 
GlennwaldSnowdenAssanged said:
[MENTION=41772]Sonny Tufts[/MENTION] do you think Assange will get a fair trial? Do you think Assange is guilty of something that deserves prosecution?
Click to expand...

I have no opinion. I haven't followed the Assange saga, although I suspect there's a statute that criminalizes unauthorized disclosure of classified information.
 
devil21 said:
Yeah, screw that whole 7th Amendment right to jury trial thing. He pissed off a judge so therefore his constitutional rights are to be ignored and a summary judgment entered without a jury trial. Sounds legit....
Click to expand...

The 7th Amendment applies only to civil cases in federal courts, as it hasn't been incorporated into the 14th Amendment. See Minneapolis & St. Louis R. Co. v. Bombolis, 241 U.S. 211 (1916). Jones's case was in a state court.

Also note that the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, which are promulgated by the Supreme Court, contain a provision similar to the Texas rule that permit a court to enter a default judgment against a party who disobeys a court order. See FRCP 37.
 
GlennwaldSnowdenAssanged said:
I wouldn't know what he did or didn't do. From the video I shared, that guy stated that he provided ton's of stuff. How would you or I know if he provided everything he could and the judge would never be satisfied?
Click to expand...

Jones will likely appeal the judgment and claim that the judge abused her discretion in imposing the default judgment sanction. The appellate court will look at all of the facts and make the call.

I can tell you that judges don't like to get involved in discovery disputes; they would rather have the parties work thing about between themselves. However, when that doesn't work, one party will ask the court for an order compelling the other side to do something -- produce documents, sit for depositions, answer interrogatories, etc. The judge may then enter an order requiring the recalcitrant party to comply. It's only when the party refuses to do so that the issue of sanctions arises.

The nuclear option is to enter a default judgment, something judges rarely do. My take is that Jones must've really abused the discovery process and violated court orders to such an extent that the judge had no alternative but to drop the default-judgment bomb. Keep in mind that this also happened in the Connecticut case in which Jones is involved. It's much more probable that you have one asshole litigant (Jones) rather than two trigger-happy judges.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

W
Sandy Hook Families are Now After Alex Jones Social Media Accounts
2 3 4
Replies
70
Views
5K
GlennwaldSnowdenAssanged
G
unknown
State minion orders Alex Jones to sell Infowars.
2 3 4
Replies
66
Views
21K
Matt Collins
Matt Collins
Occam's Banana
Alex Jones to sue CIA & FBI
2 3
Replies
48
Views
4K
jmdrake
jmdrake
Occam's Banana
SCOTUS is formally asked to overturn gay marriage ruling
Replies
16
Views
149
Occam's Banana
Occam's Banana
W
Ye West and Nick Fuentes on Alex Jones -- LIVE
Replies
3
Views
633
Anti Globalist
Anti Globalist
Back
Top