Very Accurate Political Quiz

30x28.gif


n34.gif


c57.gif
 
I don't like the quiz that much:

"45. When one group is slaughtering another group somewhere in the world, we have a responsibility to intervene."

Who is "we"? The government or individuals? That changes my answer. I assumed it was the government, so I answered no.

My result:

36x39.gif
 
Last edited:
First, how do I get the pics to show?

I think the test wasn't specific enough on some stuff, and made a lot of assumptions about politics that make it slightly biased. These types of quizzes rarely do well to place someone politically, especially for people who reflect philosophically on the ethical issues. I know quite a few I could have both agreed and disagreed on the question depending on the meaning of the words or a coupling of two statements that don't have to both be true or false. Anyway, here are my results:
a><br>




I think the reason it scored me like this on there is because I said war was an acceptable option, though last resort, and I also only "disagreed" with a low priority that military spending should be cut.

a><br>


a><br>

My score on this one is confusing because the quiz continuously confuses the term "government" and "state" for the same thing, and I didn't and answered how I would regularly.
 
Last edited:
Well in regards to the typical style (RE: Nolan Chart), right usually means Free-Market, and Left means Central Planning.

I have never understood how can you have a anarchist central planned economy. If it is anarchist there is no central authority. But anyways, I also dont see myself as far right.
 
I have never understood how can you have a anarchist central planned economy. If it is anarchist there is no central authority. But anyways, I also dont see myself as far right.

I could see a centrally planned economy arising in an anarcho-communist society, but that's about it.
 
When you take into consideration that anarchy means to be without a ruler, it is possible to see that such a situation is impossible because even if there is no organized state apparatus as exists today, there still are rulers who could centrally plan, even in an anarcho-capitalist or agorist society.
 
34x36.gif
n12.gif
c14.gif


Why am I on the "right" on the grid when my results were socially liberal?

And there were too many "we"s in the quiz, and other meaningless questions like "should marriage be heralded", when I think that yes, it should be, but not by the state. Stable reproductive units are valuable in leaving successful progeny - but I don't really care how anyone outside my own family goes about doing this.
 
Last edited:
I could see a centrally planned economy arising in an anarcho-communist society, but that's about it.

When you take into consideration that anarchy means to be without a ruler, it is possible to see that such a situation is impossible because even if there is no organized state apparatus as exists today, there still are rulers who could centrally plan, even in an anarcho-capitalist or agorist society.

Centrally planned means completely topdown. One decides, the rest obey. Having a society wihtout central planning does not mean that there is no planning. In fact there is better planning. But anyways, I am highjacking the thread.
 
Compass:

You are a far-right social libertarian.
Right: 10, Libertarian: 9.27
 
My Foreign Policy Views
n28.gif


My Culture War Stance
c62.gif


Looks about right.

Funny thing is, it calls me a social moderate when liberals call me a reactionary conservative.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top